Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: David Neumark (really)

2000-09-01 Thread Doug Henwood
Max Sawicky wrote: >If DN made inferences about black/white marginal productivity from a >specification like this, I'm not sure I want him on my side. Yeah, but who cares about that? He's saying what the people who write grant checks want to hear. Doug

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: David Neumark (really)

2000-08-31 Thread Peter Dorman
Don't worry, I don't think he is... Max Sawicky wrote: > If DN made inferences about black/white marginal productivity from a > specification like this, I'm not sure I want him on my side. > > mbs > > > Q = f([white male labor input], [black male labor input], [white female > labor > > input], [

Re: Re: Re: Re: David Neumark (really)

2000-08-31 Thread Max Sawicky
If DN made inferences about black/white marginal productivity from a specification like this, I'm not sure I want him on my side. mbs > Q = f([white male labor input], [black male labor input], [white female labor > input], [black female labor input], [other labor input, I assume], capital input

Re: Re: Re: David Neumark (really)

2000-08-31 Thread Jim Devine
At 03:38 PM 8/31/00 -0700, you wrote: > > Honestly, if David Neumark has changed his views on the minimum wage, it > > really would be no big deal. He is ready to embrace any result produced by > > the right theory, the right data set, and the right methods, given what > > "right" means in this c

Re: Re: Re: David Neumark (really)

2000-08-31 Thread Peter Dorman
Q = f([white male labor input], [black male labor input], [white female labor input], [black female labor input], [other labor input, I assume], capital input) Assume Q = [input 1] ^B1 x [input 2] ^B2 x ... x [input n] ^Bn is the form for n inputs, and use translog methods to estimate the B's. E

Re: Re: David Neumark (really)

2000-08-31 Thread Michael Perelman
Peter Dorman wrote: > I should add a word about the real David Neumark, since I knew him slightly > at Michigan State. He is the #1 labor economist in the econ department > there, which means he is crucial to personnel decisions, research > applications, etc. in that field (at that school). H

Re: Re: David Neumark (really)

2000-08-31 Thread Doug Henwood
Peter Dorman wrote: >When I left he was just completing work on discrimination and productivity. >His "contribution" was to use "white male labor", "black female labor", etc. >as separate inputs into aggregate production function analysis, determine >the productivity ratios between the groups, an

Re: David Neumark (really)

2000-08-31 Thread Peter Dorman
I should add a word about the real David Neumark, since I knew him slightly at Michigan State. He is the #1 labor economist in the econ department there, which means he is crucial to personnel decisions, research applications, etc. in that field (at that school). He is fairly typical of "star" r