Re: Keeping Tabb

2000-04-01 Thread Doyle Saylor
Title: Re: Keeping Tabb Greetings economists,    It is distressing to hear calls for ending this thread when I haven't had a chance to elaborate on what Max replied.  Where Mine Aysen Doyran observes in agreement with me, Mine, I am not a party to debate, but this kind of *suggestion*

Re: Re: Re: Re: [Fwd: Re: Keeping Tabb]

2000-03-31 Thread Ted Winslow
Carrol Cox wrote: > Sufferers from schizophrenia are people, not automobiles off an assembly > line that can be taken to the shop. Even were one to get his/her schizophrenia > under complete control past episodes would be part of the history which > he/she is. and later endorsed the following cl

Re: Re: Re: [Fwd: Re: Keeping Tabb]

2000-03-31 Thread Carrol Cox
Brad De Long wrote: > [SNIP] > > > >Schizophrenic people would generally like not to be schizophrenic (you ask The phrase "schizophrenic people" is itself objectionable. Just as tubercular people or influenza people would be silly and/or (under some cultural contexts) offensive. And since a nu

RE: Re: Re: [Fwd: Re: Keeping Tabb]

2000-03-31 Thread Max Sawicky
The >vast majority of people understand 'schizophrenia' as 'split personality', Say, rather, that the colloquial English definition of the word "schizophrenia"--as split personality or cognitive dissonance or a failure to recognize that beliefs X and Y cannot both be true--has nothing to do

Re: Re: [Fwd: Re: Keeping Tabb]

2000-03-31 Thread Brad De Long
>G'day Carrol, > >>Yes. I believe some other poster tried to confuse issues by >>claiming that when originally coined the word was intended >>to mean "split mind," but the claim is pointless. There is no >>significant sense in which schizophrenia is characterized >>by a "split mind," and the use o

Re: [Fwd: Re: Keeping Tabb]

2000-03-30 Thread Rob Schaap
G'day Carrol, >Yes. I believe some other poster tried to confuse issues by >claiming that when originally coined the word was intended >to mean "split mind," but the claim is pointless. There is no >significant sense in which schizophrenia is characterized >by a "split mind," and the use of the t

[Fwd: Re: Keeping Tabb]

2000-03-30 Thread Carrol Cox
Doyle Saylor wrote: > > MBS > More schizophrenia here, I think. > > Doyle > The phrase is anti-disabled. Yes. I believe some other poster tried to confuse issues by claiming that when originally coined the word was intended to mean "split mind," but the claim is pointless. There is no significan

RE: Re: Keeping Tabb

2000-03-30 Thread Max B. Sawicky
MBS More schizophrenia here, I think. Doyle The phrase is anti-disabled. . . . But I don't think you have the foggiest notion what schizophrenia is. So when you want to characterize non-schizophrenic persons this way, you want as usual to make the points, >> Nice to hear from you again

Re: Keeping Tabb

2000-03-30 Thread Stephen E Philion
Max wrote: Tabb and others are troubled by the anti-communist overtones of the China/WTO campaign and find it unpleasant to look at the real state of labor and human rights in China. We seem stuck in the old trap of apologizing for transgressions of really-existing communism in the belief or hop

Re: Re: Keeping Tabb

2000-03-30 Thread Rob Schaap
Title: Re: [PEN-L:17522] Re: Keeping Tabb G'day Doyle, You tax Max thus: >>More schizophrenia here, I think. >The phrase is anti-disabled. ÝYou know (I assume you are ignorant of the movement, the phrase "you know" is just a >writing tic) this country had a disabi

Re: Keeping Tabb

2000-03-29 Thread Doyle Saylor
Title: Re: Keeping Tabb Greetings Economists, MBS writes in his usual fashion, Sure if we take the latter point literally, China has not been the destination of many runaway U.S. shops.  But China is at once a real component of a globalization process, and politically symbolic of the

Keeping Tabb

2000-03-29 Thread Max B. Sawicky
I went to the MR site looking for Tabb's article, preparing to dismember it. In fact I agree with 90 percent of it. In passing I want to note that Tabb's reporting of polling results does not jive well with SP's paraphrasing. The public does think globalization is a problem for living standards