At 17/05/02 00:28 -0400, you wrote:
>Where the fuck did this come from? And why is it dated Nov 24 2002?
>
>Doug
The letter from Mark Jones quoted by Max was originally sent on Fri, 23 Nov
2001 16:04:31 +
Although Max sent a number of posts on this thread on 26 Nov I can find no
record o
I wrote to Max an hour ago trying to find out the origin of this. Mark
has not been here for some time.
On Fri, May 17, 2002 at 12:28:18AM -0400, Doug Henwood wrote:
> Max Sawicky wrote:
>
> >MJ: "The truth"about Doug 'I'm no pacifist' Henwood is that he, too, is in
> >favour of US policy, tha
MJ: "The truth"about Doug 'I'm no pacifist' Henwood is that he, too, is in
favour of US policy, that is, Henwood favours the policy of bombing Afghan
towns and cities, he favours the random and/or mass slaughter of Afghanis,
he favours the destruction of whatever remains of the social infrastr
Doug went into more detail in LBO, but Stephen, you should not pile onto
the flames by attacking Mark.
On Fri, Nov 23, 2001 at 07:12:22AM -1000, Stephen E Philion wrote:
>
> --Wierd, on other lists I've not seen any evidence of this. He's
> challenged the likes of Leo Casey on LBO and Soc. Regis
Mark in the apoplectic mode contends:
"The truth"about Doug 'I'm no pacifist' Henwood is that he, too, is in
favour of US policy, that is, Henwood favours the policy of bombing Afghan
towns and cities, he favours the random and/or mass slaughter of Afghanis,
he favours the destruction of whatever
>
>When assessing 'the truth' of Henwood's politics, let us begin with this
>obvious fact -- the man is simply a craven apologist for exterminism, for
>US imperialism in its newest and most lethal guise.
>
>
Oh, he's worse than that. He's a running dog of the imperialist bourgeoisie,
a flak for
whoa, Mark. Rather than characterize Doug as a craven apologist, let him
elaborate if he wants to do so.
--
Michael Perelman
Economics Department
California State University
Chico, CA 95929
Tel. 530-898-5321
E-Mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
