Is Lou sure the Spoons Marxism list archives are not accessible
anymore? At least via google and then clicking the cache link
I've read some of those old screamathons. Recently read some
pro-nuke shiite from Comrade Martens, for example there on those
lists. Michael Pugliese
>From: "J. Barkley Ro
At 02:35 PM 3/26/01 -0500, Barkley Rosser wrote:
> For those interested in more detailed background,
>Steve held a seminar on his book over on pkt several
>months ago. It was quite lively with extensive commentary
>and discusssions. Much of the book is very punchy and
>it is well written,
At 03:20 PM 3/27/01 -0800, you wrote:
>Why a gold standard? Why not, say, an oil standard? Or some other commodity
>that's valued by "late" capital? Wasn't gold made the standard as a holdover
>from some ancient metaphysics/superstition--it looks nice and has great
>electrical properties but what
> I'd say the only problem with Marx's vision on credit money and debt is
> that it's limited by his assumption that gold is the only form of
> international money (where the value of gold is determined by how much
> labor is needed to produce it). During the last 30 years, we've made a
> traditi
Steve Keen:
>> understanding this crisis involves an
>>appreciation of the role of credit money and debt, and this requires a
>>non-commodity theory of money which is antithetic to the commodity approach
>>to money derived from a labour theory of value.
Chris Buford:
>What on earth is the proble
At 11:15 27/03/01 -0800, you wrote:
Steve Keen:
> understanding this crisis involves an
>appreciation of the role of credit money and debt, and this requires a
>non-commodity theory of money which is antithetic to the commodity approach
>to money derived from a labour theory of value.
What on
> Are we in for Civil War redux?
>Barkley Rosser
Yes, but this time it will be to eradicate wage slavery root and branch.
Louis Proyect
Marxism mailing list: http://www.marxmail.org/
Lou,
Well, I did not find the Scottish nat stuff on that
pretty bizarre website. But it is historically true that
the KKK appropriated certain of its more well known
symbols, such as burning crosses, from the old
traditional Scottish nationalists.
BTW, I have noticed a recent odd shi
At 03:54 PM 3/27/01 -0500, you wrote:
>although it is widely and deeply entrenched
>out there that he did, Marx never labeled what he had
>as a "labor theory of value." He always referred to the
>"theory of value."
or the "law of value." More importantly, it's important to distinguish
between R
y Rosser
- Original Message -
From: "Louis Proyect" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, March 27, 2001 8:37 AM
Subject: [PEN-L:9596] Re: Re: Interesting new book?
> I just found something on Jerry Levy's list that may shed some light on
>
Louis,
Well, michael probably does not want us to
get into some kind of OPE-L discussion (and
I suspect you don't really want to either, Louie),
but what you have quoted in no way implies
what you have deciphered from it, although I
think you are probably correct about what Steve's
views of
Recognize that name, Jim Langcuster, from a list of paleo-conservatives,
I lurk on. Peopled with contributors to Chronicles and Telos
like Paul Gottfried. Editor of Telos, Paul Piccone, when he took
his paleo-con turn ran articles and interviews about the Lega
Nord in Italy. If, I read Italian, I
I just found something on Jerry Levy's list that may shed some light on
Keen's thinking:
Jerry Levy:
And, by the way, the revolution will come! And, I hope that the members of
this list will live long enough to see that day. Indeed, I hope to stand
shoulder-to-shoulder with many of them some day
At 14:35 26/03/01 -0500, Barkley wrote:
> For those interested in more detailed background,
>Steve held a seminar on his book over on pkt several
>months ago. It was quite lively with extensive commentary
>and discusssions. Much of the book is very punchy and
>it is well written, but in pl
CTED]>
Sent: Monday, March 26, 2001 11:51 AM
Subject: [PEN-L:9544] Re: Re: Interesting new book?
> Ian,
> No, the Commerce and Complexity volume is a
> different book. Steve was a coeditor of that book.
> The full reference is
> William A. Barnett, Carl Chiarella,
Ian,
No, the Commerce and Complexity volume is a
different book. Steve was a coeditor of that book.
The full reference is
William A. Barnett, Carl Chiarella, Steve Keen, Robert
Marks (not Marx), Hermann Schnabel (not Julian), eds.,
_Commerce, Complexity, and Evolution: Topics in Econo
Another interesting new book, going against the grain, for Zed
Press, no(?), is by a French journalist who works for the Evening
Telegraph or the Sunday Times. On the Rwandan genocide and U.N.
inaction. Michael Pugliese
>From: Ian Murray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Date: 3/26/01 7
17 matches
Mail list logo