So what I am I thinking of that is is Wyoming, if anything?
I presume
>>this means
>>that if Saddam Hussein blows up NORAD in retaliation, or on a routine
>>bombing mission, that he can expect that we will let it pass as
>>self-defense; I mean, why else would he be bombing targets in Wyomong.
>
001 11:59 AM
Subject: [PEN-L:8266] Re: Re: Re: Re: RE: Re: Bush war
>Justin wrote:
>>Right, a routine bombing, just what one normally does.
>
>so when the Unabomber sent mail-bombs, these could also be interpreted as
>"routine"? (BTW, I'm being ironic, too.)
>
&
Justin wrote:
>Right, a routine bombing, just what one normally does.
so when the Unabomber sent mail-bombs, these could also be interpreted as
"routine"? (BTW, I'm being ironic, too.)
>No reason, maybe "self defense"--we had to bomb them because we are over
>there in their country defending o
ccording to a well-placed U.S. official who requested anonymity,
Powell is clearly apprehensive about providing extensive U.S. support to the
INC.
"Powell knows that this is a feckless group of people whose dreams far
exceed their capabilities," the official said. "And he&#x
Well, Cheney can also be seen to have regained access to a position where he can
exact revenge rooted in his position in Daddy B's administration. And then
there's Powell... Maybe Dubba-you can appt Schwartz-cop Ambassador to Iraq...
-Original Message-
From: Jim Devine [mailto:[EMAIL PROT
Right, a routine bombing, just what one normally does. No reason, maybe
"self defense"--we had to bomb them because we are over there in their
country defending ourselves of course. I presume this means that if Saddam
Hussein blows up NORAD in retaliation, or on a routine bombing mission,
tha
Last night on Nightline, Scowcroft (sic?) was asked by Koppel if Bush
wasn't just continuing Clinton's policies against Iraq? Scowcroft
responded that this was just a 'routine mission' and not a continuation of
Clinton policy, that a new policy is still something that would be for the
future to m
