> And don't omit the $8 million that the U.S. spent--in part, thru the CIA, for the
> trucker's strike and other mischief. Remember Kissinger's comment that if the
> Chilean people were so "irresponsible" as to choose a socialist government in a
> free election, appropriate measures would have to
And don't omit the $8 million that the U.S. spent--in part, thru the CIA, for the
trucker's strike and other mischief. Remember Kissinger's comment that if the
Chilean people were so "irresponsible" as to choose a socialist government in a
free election, appropriate measures would have to be taken
> if the working class is well organized and class conscious (as in
> Chile in 1970), not only may the legislature but the executive may be
> subordinated to non-bourgeois forces.
> The problem, of course, is that in the Chilean case, the repressive
> component of the state (the armed forces) s
>>Max writes: >If you think the state is the executive committee of the
>>bourgeoisie, than you are a public choice theorist too.<
Brad sighs:
>Marx did not write in the _Manifesto_ that the state is the executive
>committee of the bourgeoisie.
>
>He wrote that the executive of the modern sta
>>> Brad De Long <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 02/10/00 01:43PM >>>
>Max writes: >If you think the state is the executive committee of
>the bourgeoisie, than you are a public choice theorist too.<
*Sigh*
Marx did not write in the _Manifesto_ that the state is the executive
committee of the bourgeoisie
Yeah, all the AMs are lefty pub choicers. See also Pzrzworski on social democracy. I
am having been developing a version of the argument that Marx's state theory is a pub
choice view for a paper I am working on about Marx and the rule of law, although
admittedly my motive is partly to annoy the
>Max writes: >If you think the state is the executive committee of
>the bourgeoisie, than you are a public choice theorist too.<
*Sigh*
Marx did not write in the _Manifesto_ that the state is the executive
committee of the bourgeoisie.
He wrote that the executive of the modern state is a comm
> >*Sigh*
>>
>>Marx did not write in the _Manifesto_ that the state is the executive
>>committee of the bourgeoisie.
>>
>>He wrote that the executive of the modern state is a committee for
>>managing the affairs of the bourgeoisie--suggesting that the
>>democratically-elected legislature of the m
>Doesn't the Virginia school merge into the literature on rent seeking --
>although
>the typical nasty rent seekers are labor unions and lawyers and the like?
yes.
Jim Devine [EMAIL PROTECTED] & http://liberalarts.lmu.edu/~jdevine
Actually, John Roemer's argument about the political-economic effects of
concentrated wealth is the sort of Marxoid public choice theory Max is talking
about. (See: A Future for Socialism.)
Peter
Jim Devine wrote:
> Max writes: >If you think the state is the executive committee of the
> bourge
cess.
mbs
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Jim Devine
Sent: Thursday, February 10, 2000 4:18 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [PEN-L:16212] Re: RE: executive committee
At 03:54 PM 2/10/00 -0500, you wrote:
>The Virginia school is not the begi
At 03:54 PM 2/10/00 -0500, you wrote:
>The Virginia school is not the beginning and end
>of public choice theory. For instance, there is
>a median voter theory that explains how, under
>completely fantastical conditions, the median
>voter is decisive in electoral matters
in the Krugman colum
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Max Sawicky
> I used a median voter model for my dissertation.
> The R-squares were beyond belief. I was more
> worried about them being too good than the
> contrary.
Do tell Max. What was your dis
The Virginia school is not the beginning and end
of public choice theory. For instance, there is
a median voter theory that explains how, under
completely fantastical conditions, the median
voter is decisive in electoral matters. There
is lit on how bureaus and politicians manipulate
electoral c
Doesn't the Virginia school merge into the literature on rent seeking -- although
the typical nasty rent seekers are labor unions and lawyers and the like?
Jim Devine wrote:
>
> The Virginia school assumes that each voter's impact in the election is the
> same as each of the other voters (and em
15 matches
Mail list logo
