RE: on urban violence (fwd)

1994-02-16 Thread Nathan Newman
On Tue, 15 Feb 1994, Doug Henwood wrote: Jipson Art asked for more info on my assertion that NYC has a lower crime rate than suburbs gone wild like Dallas and Atlanta, and that there is no relation between pop density and crime. Here are the details. Doug, The problem with your table is

RE: on urban violence (fwd)

1994-02-16 Thread Jim Devine
One reason why the crime rate is so low in Los Angeles is that what the L.A.P.D. does is generally considered to be legal. (not to mention the Sheriff's Department.) in pen-l solidarity, Jim Devine BITNET: jndf@lmuacadINTERNET: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Econ. Dept., Loyola Marymount Univ., Los

Re: on urban violence (fwd)

1994-02-15 Thread Doug Henwood
The US is one of the least densely populated countries in the world, yet it's one of the most violent. NYC is our most densely populated city but its violent crime rate is lower than the overgrown suburbs called Dallas and Atlanta. Can't be density, can it? Doug Doug Henwood [[EMAIL PROTECTED]]

RE: on urban violence (fwd)

1994-02-15 Thread Doug Henwood
Jipson Art asked for more info on my assertion that NYC has a lower crime rate than suburbs gone wild like Dallas and Atlanta, and that there is no relation between pop density and crime. Here are the details. For more, see the forthcoming LBO #62 as well as my social atlas, The State of the

Re: on urban violence (fwd)

1994-02-11 Thread Jim Devine
There might be a better spin on the "hyperactive monkeys" analogy about urban youth (though I hate any animal analogies about people especially about minorities). Awhile back they did experiments on normally calm rats (and also monkeys, I believe). Crowding them together led to a dramatic