Fred says:
>Yoshie Furuhashi wrote:
>
>> *Who else* do you think have the *potential* to become a collective
>> historical agent to transform the structures of production,
>> distribution, & consumption in an ecologically sustainable direction,
>> if not the working class? Surely not the bou
Yoshie Furuhashi wrote:
> *Who else* do you think have the *potential* to become a collective
> historical agent to transform the structures of production,
> distribution, & consumption in an ecologically sustainable direction,
> if not the working class? Surely not the bourgeoisie. Nor do
>
>Yoshie Furuhashi wrote:
>
>> Class struggle won't solve the problem of global warming in the near
>> future (supposing the near future to be the next couple of decades),
>> & nothing else will for that matter. However, without class
>> struggle, the working class won't be *even* in a positio
Yoshie Furuhashi wrote:
> Class struggle won't solve the problem of global warming in the near
> future (supposing the near future to be the next couple of decades),
> & nothing else will for that matter. However, without class
> struggle, the working class won't be *even* in a position to
> s
Fred says:
>And, putting what was a discussion of world living standards and carrying
>capacity into terms of class struggle simplifies the question so
>much that I no
>longer understand it. Mark was talking about the material impossibility of the
>rest of the world consuming in the manner of th
Am I missing something coded in the language here? Would anyone on this list
expect redistribution to happen without struggle? Those sorts are all on Santa
Claus-L.
And, putting what was a discussion of world living standards and carrying
capacity into terms of class struggle simplifies the ques
