Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: David Neumark (really)

2000-09-01 Thread Doug Henwood
Max Sawicky wrote: If DN made inferences about black/white marginal productivity from a specification like this, I'm not sure I want him on my side. Yeah, but who cares about that? He's saying what the people who write grant checks want to hear. Doug

Re: David Neumark (really)

2000-08-31 Thread Peter Dorman
I should add a word about the real David Neumark, since I knew him slightly at Michigan State. He is the #1 labor economist in the econ department there, which means he is crucial to personnel decisions, research applications, etc. in that field (at that school). He is fairly typical of "star"

Re: Re: David Neumark (really)

2000-08-31 Thread Doug Henwood
Peter Dorman wrote: When I left he was just completing work on discrimination and productivity. His "contribution" was to use "white male labor", "black female labor", etc. as separate inputs into aggregate production function analysis, determine the productivity ratios between the groups, and

Re: Re: David Neumark (really)

2000-08-31 Thread Michael Perelman
Peter Dorman wrote: I should add a word about the real David Neumark, since I knew him slightly at Michigan State. He is the #1 labor economist in the econ department there, which means he is crucial to personnel decisions, research applications, etc. in that field (at that school). He

Re: Re: Re: David Neumark (really)

2000-08-31 Thread Peter Dorman
Q = f([white male labor input], [black male labor input], [white female labor input], [black female labor input], [other labor input, I assume], capital input) Assume Q = [input 1] ^B1 x [input 2] ^B2 x ... x [input n] ^Bn is the form for n inputs, and use translog methods to estimate the B's.

Re: Re: Re: David Neumark (really)

2000-08-31 Thread Jim Devine
At 03:38 PM 8/31/00 -0700, you wrote: Honestly, if David Neumark has changed his views on the minimum wage, it really would be no big deal. He is ready to embrace any result produced by the right theory, the right data set, and the right methods, given what "right" means in this context.

Re: Re: Re: Re: David Neumark (really)

2000-08-31 Thread Max Sawicky
If DN made inferences about black/white marginal productivity from a specification like this, I'm not sure I want him on my side. mbs Q = f([white male labor input], [black male labor input], [white female labor input], [black female labor input], [other labor input, I assume], capital input)

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: David Neumark (really)

2000-08-31 Thread Peter Dorman
Don't worry, I don't think he is... Max Sawicky wrote: If DN made inferences about black/white marginal productivity from a specification like this, I'm not sure I want him on my side. mbs Q = f([white male labor input], [black male labor input], [white female labor input], [black