New Delhi, Jan 11, 2000
While more than 200 activists were staging a demonstration outside,
three protestors sneaked into a heavily guarded venue session of the
Confederation of Indian Industry (CII) Partnership Meet 2000, here
today. WTO Director General Mike Moore had just finished speaking whe
Ulhas:
>The question Doug asked was about the WTO and its impact on Indian farmers.
>So I answered accordingly. Poor farmers hardly have any surpluses to be
>affected by the WTO. Doug's question was not about the state of poor and
>marginal farmers.
Subject: Massive mobilisation in India against
Title: RE: [PEN-L:27741] RE: Re: Re: Imperialism in decline?
Ulhas:>9. Foreign policy issues are not important domestic politics. Why should they be important? We are free and independent nation. Marxists, particularly of anti-imperialist variety, don't appreciate that calling independent nat
Doug Henwood wrote:
> Ulhas Joglekar wrote:
>
> >Is Lenin's theory of imperialism relevant today?
>
> The minute Japan and the EU begin an arms buildup and fight with the
> U.S. for influence in the so-called South, and U.S., EU, and Japanese
> capitalists withdraw their investments in each othe
Ulhas Joglekar wrote:
>Is Lenin's theory of imperialism relevant today?
The minute Japan and the EU begin an arms buildup and fight with the
U.S. for influence in the so-called South, and U.S., EU, and Japanese
capitalists withdraw their investments in each other - maybe.
Doug
Devine, James:
Ulhas:>>And what is Imperialism in the first place?
> "Imperialism," as Marxists use that term, refers to a social system of
>international domination, of most countries by others. (Unlike in >other
perspectives, it is not simply a policy, a decision by government
>officials.) Ori
Title: RE: [PEN-L:27654] Re: Re: Re: Re: Imperialism in decline?
Ulhas:> And what is Imperialism in the first place?<
"Imperialism," as Marxists use that term, refers to a social system of international domination, of most countries by others. (Unlike in other perspectives,
From: Nancybrumback:
>thanks, carrol, for your response. however, the question was what is a
>dialectical approach in the first place?
And what is Imperialism in the first place?
Ulhas
