[PEN-L:9559] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: ergonomics, etc.
> At 12:45 PM 3/26/01 -0500, you wrote:
> >They could overdo it. But, most people do not
> >even know what they are doing. It is a successful
> >stealth campaign so far.
>
> yeah, but I'm trying to intu
At 12:45 PM 3/26/01 -0500, you wrote:
>They could overdo it. But, most people do not
>even know what they are doing. It is a successful
>stealth campaign so far.
yeah, but I'm trying to intuit future trends.
> As for North Korea, they are probably right that
>the DPRK will not outright i
Jim,
What scares me is that they may be able to get
away with all of this. People do not pay close attention
to all these policy changes. If Bush can have his
recession in the next year or two and then get a
"morning in America" upturn by the next election,
he can pretty damn well do anyth
On Sun, 25 Mar 2001, Doug Henwood wrote:
> Mark Laffey wrote:
>
> >What evidence is there that Nader voters were in fact potential Gore voters?
> >That is, is there any data to show that had Nader not been an option, the
> >people who voted for him would have voted for Gore? Surely that is the
Mark Laffey wrote:
>What evidence is there that Nader voters were in fact potential Gore voters?
>That is, is there any data to show that had Nader not been an option, the
>people who voted for him would have voted for Gore? Surely that is the
>correct question to ask. Nader voters may simply h
>But the idea that the left cannot be taken for granted is profoundly
>frightening to Dems.
And profoundly heart-gladdening for Republicans.
>The idea that we might be able to exercise real power is absolutely
>terrifying. If we are to put together a winning party, it means
>taking votes from
Hey, Mark, don't bother. The Demicans can't face up to the fact that they
lost because they ran like Repugs, as well as running a generally sorry,
suckass candidate who blew what should have been a sure thing, and they are
deeply resentful because they think they own the votes of the left. The
