RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Rational expectations

2000-08-03 Thread Adam . Stokes
95% completeonly 95% to go;) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: None To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [PEN-L:253] Re: RE: Re: RE: Rational expectations It is about 95% complete. The working title is Intellectual Property Amidst Poverty

Re: RE: Re: RE: Rational expectations

2000-08-03 Thread michael
It is about 95% complete. The working title is Intellectual Property Amidst Poverty. > > What's the title Michael? > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: None > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [PEN-L:250] Re: RE: Rational expectations > >

Re: Re: Re: Re: Rational expectations

2000-08-03 Thread Michael Perelman
Japan grew very fast in the postwar period because its previous economists were mostly excluded because of their fascist past, leading to a void that Marxist trained economists filled. Eventually, Japan started hiring mostly orthodox economists and their economy slowed down. During the Depressio

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: rational expectations

2000-08-03 Thread JKSCHW
> Nonetheless, it's best to make criticisms with _content_. When it's worth doing. It's information to know that someone's viewsare not worth paying attention to. >Also, I understand that in the past, there have been philosophers who were rejected by the vast majority but later turned out t

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: rational expectations

2000-08-03 Thread Jim Devine
At 05:09 PM 8/3/00 -0400, you wrote: >No, philosophy has even less consensus than economics. So it tells you >something when practically nobody takes B seriously, eh? And not just >because of his political orientation. People who share his general >political orientation--all those Marxists or t

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: rational expectations

2000-08-03 Thread JKSCHW
No, philosophy has even less consensus than economics. So it tells you something when practically nobody takes B seriously, eh? And not just because of his political orientation. People who share his general political orientation--all those Marxists or then-Marxists I mentioned--have no respect

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: rational expectations

2000-08-03 Thread Jim Devine
Justin wrote: >Look, Jim, I often defer to your economics expertise--not always, but >often. If you tell me that someone is a crank with no respectable >following in econ, I will be inclined to go along with you, since you are >a real expert. Expertise is, after all, a legitimate basis of appea

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: rational expectations

2000-08-03 Thread JKSCHW
Look, Jim, I often defer to your economics expertise--not always, but often. If you tell me that someone is a crank with no respectable following in econ, I will be inclined to go along with you, since you are a real expert. Expertise is, after all, a legitimate basis of appeal to authority. Th

Re: Re: Re: Re: rational expectations

2000-08-03 Thread Jim Devine
At 10:43 AM 08/03/2000 -0400, you wrote: >I dob't want to get into this beyong what I say here, but, as I have >explained variously, Bhaskar is a fool who is not taken seriously by real >philosophers of science outside his cult, which mystifies me. I should >explain that I was trained as a phil

Re: Re: Re: Re: rational expectations

2000-08-02 Thread JKSCHW
Yeah, Carroll, I have read, and indeed studied, a lot of Stalin as well as Lenin. Not only was I a Sovietologist, I was in and out of some outfits where Stalin was "in." I can still give you chapter and verse on various outre Stalinist views, such as his linguistic theories. Anyway, you wil

Re: what is 'orange'?Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: rational expectations

2000-08-01 Thread Nestor Miguel Gorojovsky
En relaciĆ³n a [PEN-L:37] what is 'orange'?Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: R, el 31 Jul 00, a las 12:33, Stephen E Philion dijo: > > el 31 Jul 00, a las 9:48, Stephen E Philion dijo: > > > > > Nestor's sounding pretty orange these days... > > > > > > Steve > > > > Since the quip is on myself, what is this

Re: Re: Re: Re: rational expectations

2000-07-31 Thread Doug Henwood
Nestor Miguel Gorojovsky wrote: >En relaciĆ³n a [PEN-L:2] Re: Re: rational expectations, >el 30 Jul 00, a las 6:18, Doug Henwood dijo: > >> Yoshie Furuhashi wrote: >> >> >What does this say about the "male list" of economists? >> >> Dunno, but I've never noticed that a lack of confidence was on

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: rational expectations

2000-07-31 Thread Stephen E Philion
Nestor's sounding pretty orange these days... Steve On Mon, 31 Jul 2000, Doug Henwood wrote: > Nestor Miguel Gorojovsky wrote: > > >I guess this is what would be taken as a funny remark in Manhattan. > >For me it is just a demonstration that lack of confidence is expected > >in women, and that

Re: Re: Re: Re: rational expectations

2000-07-31 Thread Doug Henwood
Nestor Miguel Gorojovsky wrote: >I guess this is what would be taken as a funny remark in Manhattan. >For me it is just a demonstration that lack of confidence is expected >in women, and that only exceptional "specimens" (sorry, Yoshie, just >trying to be clear) escape it. As we say in Spanish, i