En relación a [PEN-L:2322] Re: Re: Dissolving history (was Re: ,
el 26 Sep 00, a las 8:30, Michael Perelman dijo:
> I don't think that Nestor was accusing you of either crime.
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > I am not an academic or an economist. You will have to decide for
> > yourself whet
En relación a [PEN-L:2320] Re: Dissolving history (was Re: Re: ,
el 26 Sep 00, a las 10:50, [EMAIL PROTECTED] dijo
> I am not an academic or an economist. You will have to decide for
> yourself whether I am a faithful servant of the IMF. --jks
[I had previously pointed out that jks's way of thi
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 09/25/00 06:09PM >>>
> Given the
>pressures on it, the Milosevic government has been one of the mildest in
recent history. It is no more repressive than the FSLN in Nicaragua...
Why this compulsion to lie to blacken the reputation of the Sandinistas?
(((
CB:
I am not an academic or an economist. You will have to decide for yourself whether I
am a faithful servant of the IMF. --jks
In a message dated Tue, 26 Sep 2000 7:45:24 AM Eastern Daylight Time, "Nestor Miguel
Gorojovsky" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
<< En relación a [PEN-L:2302] Re: Re: The U
En relación a [PEN-L:2302] Re: Re: The US buys democracy for Yu,
el 25 Sep 00, a las 23:03, [EMAIL PROTECTED] dijo:
> I disn't say that the historical facts are unimportant--although
> sometimes I think it's advisable to forget them for pragmatic purposes
> when trying to frame a solution to a c
This is quite interesting. However, I thought that the autonomous status of
Kosovo was revoked because Kosovo refused to accept the structural
adjustment provisions attached to an IMF loan. By revoking autonomy Kosovo
was forced to accept the conditions. Those conditions also prohibited some
of th
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date sent: Mon, 25 Sep 2000 23:03:24 EDT
Subject:[PEN-L:2302] Re: Re: The US buys democracy for Yugoslavia.
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Send reply to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> In a message dated 9/25/00 5
In a message dated 9/25/00 5:57:37 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
<< Surely historical facts are not unimportant, when one discusses the
"judgment of history," no? In any case, what FAIR is trying to do,
of course, is not to fuel disputes over "who did what to whom firs
From: "Nestor Miguel Gorojovsky" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date sent: Mon, 25 Sep 2000 22:27:30 -0300
Subject:[PEN-L:2294] A correction (was Re: Re: Re: The US buys
democracy for Yugos
En relación a [PEN-L:2288] Re: Re: Re: The US buys democracy fo,
el 25 Sep 00, a las 21:22, Nestor Miguel Gorojovsky dijo:
>
> What would they say if, for example, Pinochet lavishly funded a pro-
> Russian party for the American elections? Or would they, in the end,
> prefer to vote for "their
I simply cannot, repeat, cannot understand those people who consider
themselves progressive and accept that their country, a great power,
gets involved in politics within other countries, and supposes to
have a right to decide who is the respectable president and who is
not.
What would they s
At 03:09 PM 9/25/00 -0700, you wrote:
>> Given the
>>pressures on it, the Milosevic government has been one of the mildest in
>recent history. It is no more repressive than the FSLN in Nicaragua...
>
>Why this compulsion to lie to blacken the reputation of the Sandinistas?
This is flame bait.
>Kosovars are not innocent helpful victims.
Most *are*.
>Serbs are not monsters of quasi-Nazi brutality.
Some *are*--and a lot of those who are work for the government...
Brad DeLong
--
Professor J. Bradford DeLong
Department of Economics, #3880
University of California at Berkeley
Berkeley,
> Given the
>pressures on it, the Milosevic government has been one of the mildest in
recent history. It is no more repressive than the FSLN in Nicaragua...
Why this compulsion to lie to blacken the reputation of the Sandinistas?
I am seriously uninterested in who did what to whom first in Kosovo or elsewhere. That
always leads to the argument that it is OK for the first victim to do the same thing
back, a notion that I, geneally unsuccessfully, continually try to disabuse my kids of.
Kosovars are not innocent helpful
On 25 Sep 00, at 11:21, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I am not surprised, but I am disappointed, to find Louis falling in with the defense
>of the Milosovic regime, even to comparing it with the Sandinistas, whose mistakes
>were at least part of a policy of promoting a government policy intendedto
Ken, you forget that here in the "land of the free," the word "democracy"
(or "having a hard transition to democracy") is synonymous with loyalty to
the US.
Second, I think it's interesting that the State Department is making
analogies with the "people power" overthrow of Marcos. Didn't the US
Justin:
"Whatever was socialist in the Yugoslav economy is gone, except for some
ideological window dressing that no one even pretends to believe any more.
Moreover, the M regime that participated in the partition by force of
Yugoslavia, supported the Bosnian serbs in the Bosnian war, and engaged
I am not surprised, but I am disappointed, to find Louis falling in with the defense
of the Milosovic regime, even to comparing it with the Sandinistas, whose mistakes
were at least part of a policy of promoting a government policy intendedto promote the
welfare of ordinary Nicaraguans, rather
The hypocrisy of US foreign policy requires no comment, although no dount
it demands outrage. But no one outside his thuggish clique could mourn the
defeat of Milosovic. --jks
===
This accusation of "thuggish" reflects imperialist propaganda. Given the
pressures on it, the Milosevic government
20 matches
Mail list logo
