Title: how many
How many members of the Bush Administration are needed to
replace a light bulb?
The answer is seven:
1. One to deny that a light
bulb needs to be replaced.
2. One to attack and
question the patriotism of anyone who has questions about the light
bulb.
3. One to blame
Of course, Churchill isn't cited as the
war criminal and racist that he was because
(1) his last stint as PM involved a war against
a generally-accepted bad guy; and (2) he won.
Blair Bush may not win, while it's possible
that they could become generally accepted as bad
guys.
-- Jimmy D.
Devine, James wrote:
Of course, Churchill isn't cited as the
war criminal and racist that he was because
(1) his last stint as PM involved a war against
a generally-accepted bad guy; and (2) he won.
Blair Bush may not win, while it's possible
that they could become generally accepted as
Jimmy D. wrote:
Of course, Churchill isn't cited as the
war criminal and racist that he was because
(1) his last stint as PM involved a war against
a generally-accepted bad guy; and (2) he won.
Blair Bush may not win, while it's possible
that they could become generally accepted as bad
guys.
Jimmy D wrote:
Of course, Churchill isn't cited as the
war criminal and racist that he was because
(1) his last stint as PM involved a war against
a generally-accepted bad guy; and (2) he won.
Blair Bush may not win, while it's possible
that they could become generally accepted as bad
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article6171.htm
History Forgave Churchill, Why Not Blair and Bush?
by Mickey Z.
19 July 2003 dissidentvoice.org -- On July 17, 2003, U.K. Prime Minister
Tony Blair addressed a joint meeting of the U.S. House and Senate. The
subject of WMD, of course, was
Recalled beef was served at Nevada County eateries
By Jon Ortiz -- Bee Staff Writer
Published 2:15 a.m. PST Saturday, January 17, 2004
Get weekday updates of Sacramento Bee headlines and breaking news. Sign up
here.
Three weeks after federal officials issued a recall of beef linked to a mad
cow
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 09/22/02 13:52 PM
2) Carrol: I have been aware of a proposed conflict presidential power
between the 'cowboys' (Texan based oil) the 'yankees' (northern based
financial based capital). Is this outlandish inconsistent with facts?
Hari
former sdser/new leftist turned
Title: RE: [PEN-L:30598] Re: Re: Re: Bush Militarism- How many Divisionsare there in
agreeing with Michael H.,
The pluralist theory of competing factions makes sense -- once it's realized that the process of competition is weighted to benefit those with the most wealth or similar economic
Thanks Michael Hoover.
The analysis I first read (re sectional interests the Yankees vs the
Cowboys) did indeed invoke Ogelsby. It was in a work by W.B.Bland in
an issue of Communist League from the 70's; discussed matters of the
USA politics - from the Kennedy assassination - through to
I have probably missed this due to recent absence, but what do list
members think re the apparent divisions in the ruling class regarding
assulting Iraq?
i) Are these real divisions - or merely 'willpower'? Or do they
represent mroe objective capitalist class divisions?
ii) If the latter - What
I don't see much division, except how to market the war. Disgusting
sight.
On Sun, Sep 22, 2002 at 09:36:34AM -0400, Hari Kumar wrote:
I have probably missed this due to recent absence, but what do list
members think re the apparent divisions in the ruling class regarding
assulting Iraq?
i)
They are more or less sharp _differences of opinion_. They are not in
any politically significant sense _divisions_. There is no set
terminology here, probably because there is no very strong tradition of
theory and practice around ruling-class unity/division. And I think
there is a reason for
Michael P said There are none.
Carrol Said:
"They are not in any politically significant sense _divisions_. ...And
I think
there is a reason for that: divisions in the ruling class occur
only under heavy pressure from the working-class. Divisions on the international
level, such as
The restraints on Bush have been a suggestion that he get approval of
congress and the UN before beginning the war. Going to the UN is
expensive, because he has to bribe others to go along with it.
I am not sure if some of the debate was not orchestrated in the first
place. Once Bush agreed to
ation at risk for re-election, some segments of capital are concerned that their payoff may not materialize in two or three years.Robert D. Manning
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Hari Kumar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pen-l <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: [PEN-L:30446] Bus
question, unlike NPG or Dave Foreman. What's the number guys? How
many people can the earth support?
Doug
And with what social institutions?
Brad DeLong, wondering if any of his descendants will break down
doors on night raids for the Fertility Police...
question, unlike NPG or Dave Foreman. What's the number guys? How
many people can the earth support?
Doug
question, unlike NPG or Dave Foreman. What's the number guys? How
many people can the earth support?
Doug
Being a lit-critter, not a bean-counter, I have no idea, but now that
you mention it, I'm curious. Suppose everyone on earth is to live
(at least) at the level of Brad's living standard
Doug Henwood wrote:
Our resident Club of Rome is extremely discreet on the population
question, unlike NPG or Dave Foreman. What's the number guys? How
many people can the earth support?
We have been discussing not population, but energy, which the resident
Simonists are extremely discreet
the working class deserve nothing less than that. How many Brads
can the earth support? Or how many Brads can capitalism support?
On a world scale, there's not much difference between you Brad.
Someone with an income of $25,000 is richer than 98% of the world's
population; even the bottom
...
Our resident Club of Rome is extremely discreet on the population
question, unlike NPG or Dave Foreman. What's the number guys? How
many people can the earth support?
Doug
Being a lit-critter, not a bean-counter, I have no idea, but now that
you mention it, I'm curious. Suppose
the working class deserve nothing less than that. How many Brads
can the earth support? Or how many Brads can capitalism support?
On a world scale, there's not much difference between you Brad.
Someone with an income of $25,000 is richer than 98% of the world's
population; even the bottom decile
Eugene Coyle wrote:
Doug, you ignore the demonstration effect. What a Chez Panisse patron
does becomes the goal of the rest of us. The environment
can only be saved by stopping the rich from consuming more. And more.
And more. And more. And more.
This is blame-shifting. It's like blaming
Doug Henwood wrote:
Eugene Coyle wrote:
Doug, you ignore the demonstration effect. What a Chez Panisse patron
does becomes the goal of the rest of us. The environment
can only be saved by stopping the rich from consuming more. And more.
And more. And more. And more.
This is
Carrol, look! please! I have been following the discussions with
amazement here! "Eco-fascism" is a mistakenly directed ad hominem-- an
unfortunate mischarecterization, to justify the eco-fascism of capitalism
and the demands of the mainstream environmental movement. Association of
socialist
It is not blame shifting. I am saying that Capitalism has us emulating the
rich -- anybody richer than ourselves, regardless
of whatever level we are at as individuals. And the people in the 89th
percentile are driven to live like those in the 90th.
I'm not saying that the rich consume all
the working class deserve nothing less than that. How many Brads
can the earth support? Or how many Brads can capitalism support?
On a world scale, there's not much difference between you Brad.
Someone with an income of $25,000 is richer than 98% of the world's
population; even the bottom
Brad De Long wrote:
Brad DeLong, wondering if any of his descendants will break down
doors on night raids for the Fertility Police...
This everyone knows -- when living standards rise, birthrates fall unless
artificially pumped up in some way. So there will be no need for
fertility
29 matches
Mail list logo
