At 16:21 01/06/2007, sartesian wrote:
Just a point, and I don't think it's minor or just
semantic. There is no Marxian political economy.
There is no Marxist political economy. Marxism begins
with a contribution to the end of political economy.
says who?
michael
Michael A. Lebowitz
P
"michael a. lebowitz" wrote:
>
> At 16:21 01/06/2007, sartesian wrote:
>
> >Just a point, and I don't think it's minor or just
> >semantic. There is no Marxian political economy.
> >There is no Marxist political economy. Marxism begins
> >with a contribution to the end of political economy.
>
> s
At 20:45 01/06/2007, carrol wrote:
"michael a. lebowitz" wrote:
>
> At 16:21 01/06/2007, sartesian wrote:
>
> >Just a point, and I don't think it's minor or just
> >semantic. There is no Marxian political economy.
> >There is no Marxist political economy. Marxism begins
> >with a contribution
Carroll wrote:
> >Just a point, and I don't think it's minor or just
>semantic. There is no Marxian political economy.
>There is no Marxist political economy. Marxism begins
> >with a contribution to the end of political economy.
says who?
Well, I suppose one could answer, Karl Marx
- Original Message -
From: "michael a. lebowitz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Friday, June 01, 2007 7:44 PM
Subject: [PEN-L] dicta
> At 16:21 01/06/2007, sartesian wrote:
>
> >Just a point, and I don't think it's minor or just
> >semantic. There i
For a dialectician, for Marx, extraction of the real content requires
the overthrow of the alienated form. Political economy is precisely the
alienated form.
- Original Message -
From: "Shane Mage" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Friday, June 01, 2007 11:08 PM
Subject: R
At 23:28 01/06/2007, sartesian wrote:
Says Marx. In everything he writes he attacks political economy [of capital],
exposing its class function. He is quite clear on what political
economy [of capital]
is-- an ideological function, a necessary obscuring of the actual social
relation of producti
el a. lebowitz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Friday, June 01, 2007 11:56 PM
Subject: Re: [PEN-L] dicta
At 08:04 02/06/2007, sartesian wrote:
Michael,
First, I sense I may have personally offended you, and/or others. That
is not at all my intention.
But regarding Marx's statement addressing the First International
Marx's makes lots of statements that may or may not be consistent with
the f
OK, will check into those works... and try to avoid expressing
disagreements as dicta.
- Original Message -
From: "michael a. lebowitz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Saturday, June 02, 2007 9:51 AM
Subject: Re: [PEN-L] dicta
> At 08:04 02/06/2007, sartesian
check into those works... and try to avoid expressing
disagreements as dicta.
- Original Message -
From: "michael a. lebowitz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Saturday, June 02, 2007 9:51 AM
Subject: Re: [PEN-L] dicta
> At 08:04 02/06/2007, sartesian wrote:
>
> &g
11 matches
Mail list logo