Re: Fwd: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Re: fixing is_deeply]

2005-07-05 Thread Andrew Pimlott
On Wed, Jul 06, 2005 at 12:10:43AM +0100, Fergal Daly wrote: > On 7/5/05, Andrew Pimlott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > my $x = []; > > sub one_way = { $x } > > sub another_way = { [] } > > sub test = { $_[0] == $x } > > > > I don't think this breaks your rules, but see below. > > You're right, I

Re: Fwd: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Re: fixing is_deeply]

2005-07-05 Thread Andrew Pimlott
On Tue, Jul 05, 2005 at 10:15:16AM +0200, demerphq wrote: > (apologies about the slow follow up) not slow in my book :-) > On 7/4/05, Andrew Pimlott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 04, 2005 at 12:36:29AM +0200, demerphq wrote: > > > On 7/3/05, Andrew Pimlott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Re: 5.004_xx in the wild?

2005-07-05 Thread Paul Johnson
On Wed, Jul 06, 2005 at 01:36:10AM +0200, Abigail wrote: > On Mon, Jul 04, 2005 at 05:21:01PM +0200, Paul Johnson wrote: > > > > Unfortunately, upgrading isn't always an option. Anyone can type > > > > $ ./Configure -des && make && make test install > > > > but putting the results of such a c

Re: How to get started with Test::TAP::HTMLMatrix

2005-07-05 Thread Chris Hutchinson
> I'd like to use Test::TAP::HTMLMatrix to better visualize the state of > large test runs. > > However, I can't tell from the docs how to run the test suite such that > it gets involved in the process. Could someone provide an example? > > Thanks! > > Mark > For what it's worth, I wrote

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Test::Symlink

2005-07-05 Thread Michael G Schwern
Ni[kt] picking comments: There's no example code in the SYNOPSIS. Your example code which uses Test::Symlink should show how to set up the plan. Namely: use Test::Symlink tests => 2; I think not verifying that the destination exists is a mistake as probably the biggest issue with symlinks is th

Re: Fwd: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Re: fixing is_deeply]

2005-07-05 Thread Fergal Daly
On 7/5/05, Andrew Pimlott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, Jul 05, 2005 at 01:24:38AM +0100, Fergal Daly wrote: > > There's an easy way to see what's "accptable" and what's not and what > > exactly this level equality means. Consider the following code > > template: > > > > ### > > # lots o

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Test::Symlink

2005-07-05 Thread Nik Clayton
Ivorw wrote: I have a concern on this relating to portability. How will the module behave on platforms that don't have symlinks? In theory symlink_ok() will automatically skip any tests that it's asked to do if symlinks aren't supported. Since I don't have systems that I can test it on wher

RE: [ANNOUNCE] Test::Symlink

2005-07-05 Thread ivorw
> -Original Message- > From: Nik Clayton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 05 July 2005 14:13 > To: perl-qa@perl.org > Subject: [ANNOUNCE] Test::Symlink > > > * Replies will be sent through Spamex to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > * For additional info click -> http://www.spamex.com/i/?v=6889066 >

[ANNOUNCE] Test::Symlink

2005-07-05 Thread Nik Clayton
The uploaded file Test-Symlink-0.01.tar.gz has entered CPAN as file: $CPAN/authors/id/N/NI/NIKC/Test-Symlink-0.01.tar.gz size: 4123 bytes md5: 9a3797b3d94c3ad73b061bd7b1aa2134 Test::Symlink is the first in a series of modules that I'm writing. They differ from many of the modules

RE: what slow could be in Compress::Zlib? (was RE: 5.004_xx in the wild?)

2005-07-05 Thread Paul Marquess
From: Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > On Mon, Jul 04, 2005 at 02:19:16PM +0100, Paul Marquess wrote: > > Whilst I'm here, when I do get around to posting a beta on CPAN, I'd > prefer > > it doesn't get used in anger until it has bedded-in. If I give the > module a > > version n

Re: 5.004_xx in the wild?

2005-07-05 Thread Adam Kennedy
As someone whose production code is currently required to run under 5.5.3, I'm very grateful to module authors whose code still runs under that version at least. A number of modules which don't run under 5.5.3 do with simple changes, primarily changing "our" to "use vars" and getting rid of x.y.z

Re: 5.004_xx in the wild?

2005-07-05 Thread Michael G Schwern
On Tue, Jul 05, 2005 at 10:59:53AM +0200, David Landgren wrote: > I like to use constant when I can, but the further you go back in time > the more brain-damaged it becomes. I think in 5.005 it only knows about > scalars. No hashrefs or arrayrefs allowed. I find this is a bit of a > bugger to wo

Re: 5.004_xx in the wild?

2005-07-05 Thread David Landgren
Michael G Schwern wrote: [...] That said, here's the main differences: * No qr//. Even if you target 5.5.4 qr// still has lots of bugs. [...] Once you go through the initial pain of backporting its not too big a deal to keep things working as long as you're not doing XS. qr// is the only

Re: Fwd: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Re: fixing is_deeply]

2005-07-05 Thread demerphq
(apologies about the slow follow up) On 7/4/05, Andrew Pimlott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, Jul 04, 2005 at 12:36:29AM +0200, demerphq wrote: > > On 7/3/05, Andrew Pimlott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >Would using > > > > > > my $s = sub { $a->[0] = 1; $_[0]; } > > > > > > above also

Re: 5.004_xx in the wild?

2005-07-05 Thread Michael G Schwern
On Tue, Jul 05, 2005 at 12:37:28PM +1000, Adam Kennedy wrote: > If anyone cares about this enough to do something about it, I've > previously outlined a scheme for supporting statistics in CPAN in a way > that covers all the bases (including #perl picking it apart for about a > day). The proble

[ANNOUNCE] Test::Tester 0.102

2005-07-05 Thread Fergal Daly
Fix a problem with the "easy way" of doing things. Warn if Test::Tester isn't the first Test::Builder module loaded as this can cause problems when doing things the easy way.

Re: 5.004_xx in the wild?

2005-07-05 Thread Adam Kennedy
I've just been through the should-I-shouldn't-I-support-5.4 with my (painfully slow) rewrite of Compress::Zlib. In the end I included limited support for 5.004 because I could, plus I have no feel for how much pain I would cause folk if I didn't. If anyone cares about this enough to do somethin

Re: Fwd: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Re: fixing is_deeply]

2005-07-05 Thread Fergal Daly
On 7/4/05, Andrew Pimlott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, Jul 04, 2005 at 12:36:29AM +0200, demerphq wrote: > > On 7/3/05, Andrew Pimlott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >Would using > > > > > > my $s = sub { $a->[0] = 1; $_[0]; } > > > > > > above also be "looking at refaddrs"? > > > > No.