Re: prove with Devel::Cover example?

2005-07-10 Thread Mark Stosberg
On Sat, Jun 04, 2005 at 02:10:37AM -0700, Michael G Schwern wrote: > On Fri, Jun 03, 2005 at 02:04:50PM -0500, Pete Krawczyk wrote: > > }How can I use 'prove' and Devel::Cover together? I tried: > > > > HARNESS_PERL_SWITCHES=-MDevel::Cover prove file.t > > Kinda surprised there's not a --cover s

Re: Graphing Perl Package Usage for Fun and Profit

2005-07-10 Thread Tels
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Moin Randy, On Sunday 10 July 2005 15:08, Randy W. Sims wrote: > Tels wrote: > > graph-perl-usage is a little script that uses various > > modules/programs to generate usage graphs of Perl package. That is, > > it tracks which package uses or requires which and

Re: Self-testing kwalitee

2005-07-10 Thread chromatic
On Sat, 2005-07-09 at 12:53 +0100, Nik Clayton wrote: > Having been a little more prolific on the module front recently I'm > interesting in making sure that my own modules pass the kwalitee tests. > Preferably before I put them on CPAN. > > But poking through qa.perl.org I can't find anywher

Re: AnnoCPAN and a wiki POD idea

2005-07-10 Thread Smylers
Adam Kennedy writes: > Adrian Howard wrote: > > > > http://www.annocpan.org/~ADAMK/ > Nope... > > PPI (1 notes; latest 2005-07-04 ) Yup. > Click on PPI... > > List of 9 versions of PPI, no information on the notes. Given that one of the advertised features of AnnoCpan is how it automatic

Backwards (?) kwalitee definition on qa.perl.org

2005-07-10 Thread Nik Clayton
http://qa.perl.org/phalanx/kwalitee.html says: What is kwalitee? Kwalitee is inexact quality. We don't know exactly what it is, but we know it when we see it. Isn't that backwards? I thought 'kwalitee' was supposed to be a metric that was exact, and that (hopefully) had some corr

Re: AnnoCPAN and a wiki POD idea

2005-07-10 Thread Adam Kennedy
Adrian Howard wrote: On 8 Jul 2005, at 20:08, Adam Kennedy wrote: [snip] There's no way to get a listing of the annotations for a given author id, or even for a given dist. So I'm reduced to manually looking through a thousand odd web pages to find potential changes or improvements to the

Re: AnnoCPAN and a wiki POD idea

2005-07-10 Thread Adam Kennedy
Adrian Howard wrote: On 8 Jul 2005, at 20:08, Adam Kennedy wrote: [snip] There's no way to get a listing of the annotations for a given author id, or even for a given dist. So I'm reduced to manually looking through a thousand odd web pages to find potential changes or improvements to the

Self-testing kwalitee

2005-07-10 Thread Nik Clayton
Having been a little more prolific on the module front recently I'm interesting in making sure that my own modules pass the kwalitee tests. Preferably before I put them on CPAN. But poking through qa.perl.org I can't find anywhere that these tests are actually rigorously defined. The closes

Re: AnnoCPAN and a wiki POD idea

2005-07-10 Thread Adam Kennedy
PS. An AnnoCPAN tip: Notice that if you are an author, you can subscribe to all comments on your modules: http://www.annocpan.org/~MARKSTOS/recent.rss I don't _want_ to subscribe to my feed. RSS would be just another distration in my life. What I'd just like, every 3 months or so when I've go

Re: Graphing Perl Package Usage for Fun and Profit

2005-07-10 Thread Randy W. Sims
Tels wrote: graph-perl-usage is a little script that uses various modules/programs to generate usage graphs of Perl package. That is, it tracks which package uses or requires which and puts that into a graph. Recursively, if you wish so. Neato, cool. How difficult would it be to add an option t

Graphing Perl Package Usage for Fun and Profit

2005-07-10 Thread Tels
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Moin, Leon Brocard (hi! :) did some graphing of various Perl things back in 2001 or so. I thought I'd also do something alike[0]. It can be very hard to follow what ends up actually in memory when you "use Some::Package;" - especially because that depends on n