On Sat, Jun 04, 2005 at 02:10:37AM -0700, Michael G Schwern wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 03, 2005 at 02:04:50PM -0500, Pete Krawczyk wrote:
> > }How can I use 'prove' and Devel::Cover together? I tried:
> >
> > HARNESS_PERL_SWITCHES=-MDevel::Cover prove file.t
>
> Kinda surprised there's not a --cover s
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Moin Randy,
On Sunday 10 July 2005 15:08, Randy W. Sims wrote:
> Tels wrote:
> > graph-perl-usage is a little script that uses various
> > modules/programs to generate usage graphs of Perl package. That is,
> > it tracks which package uses or requires which and
On Sat, 2005-07-09 at 12:53 +0100, Nik Clayton wrote:
> Having been a little more prolific on the module front recently I'm
> interesting in making sure that my own modules pass the kwalitee tests.
> Preferably before I put them on CPAN.
>
> But poking through qa.perl.org I can't find anywher
Adam Kennedy writes:
> Adrian Howard wrote:
> >
> > http://www.annocpan.org/~ADAMK/
> Nope...
>
> PPI (1 notes; latest 2005-07-04 )
Yup.
> Click on PPI...
>
> List of 9 versions of PPI, no information on the notes.
Given that one of the advertised features of AnnoCpan is how it
automatic
http://qa.perl.org/phalanx/kwalitee.html says:
What is kwalitee?
Kwalitee is inexact quality. We don't know exactly what it is,
but we know it when we see it.
Isn't that backwards? I thought 'kwalitee' was supposed to be a metric
that was exact, and that (hopefully) had some corr
Adrian Howard wrote:
On 8 Jul 2005, at 20:08, Adam Kennedy wrote:
[snip]
There's no way to get a listing of the annotations for a given author
id, or even for a given dist. So I'm reduced to manually looking
through a thousand odd web pages to find potential changes or
improvements to the
Adrian Howard wrote:
On 8 Jul 2005, at 20:08, Adam Kennedy wrote:
[snip]
There's no way to get a listing of the annotations for a given author
id, or even for a given dist. So I'm reduced to manually looking
through a thousand odd web pages to find potential changes or
improvements to the
Having been a little more prolific on the module front recently I'm
interesting in making sure that my own modules pass the kwalitee tests.
Preferably before I put them on CPAN.
But poking through qa.perl.org I can't find anywhere that these tests
are actually rigorously defined.
The closes
PS. An AnnoCPAN tip: Notice that if you are an author, you can subscribe
to all comments on your modules:
http://www.annocpan.org/~MARKSTOS/recent.rss
I don't _want_ to subscribe to my feed. RSS would be just another
distration in my life.
What I'd just like, every 3 months or so when I've go
Tels wrote:
graph-perl-usage is a little script that uses various modules/programs to
generate usage graphs of Perl package. That is, it tracks which package
uses or requires which and puts that into a graph. Recursively, if you
wish so.
Neato, cool. How difficult would it be to add an option t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Moin,
Leon Brocard (hi! :) did some graphing of various Perl things back in 2001
or so. I thought I'd also do something alike[0].
It can be very hard to follow what ends up actually in memory when you
"use Some::Package;" - especially because that depends on n
11 matches
Mail list logo