On 9/29/06, Alexandr Ciornii <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello!
For a long time I'm using Test::Reporter. Now I participate in Vanilla
Perl project (http://win32.perl.org). I've started CPAN smoke.
I've come to several ideas regarding cpantesters. I want your opinion on
them.
1. YAML files on h
Chris Dolan wrote:
> On Sep 27, 2006, at 5:53 PM, Christopher H. Laco wrote:
>
>> Ha ha. I just realized that I totally screwed myself out of using this
>> policy. I'm using a subclass of Test::More, not Test:More itself.
>>
>> See "Don't 'rm -fr /' when testing" for the topic of that.
>>
>> Would
* Chris Dolan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-10-02 19:35]:
> This ones already possible in a limited sense. I subscribe to
> http://testers.cpan.org/author/CLOTHO.rss
> to see all pass/fail announcements for my modules.
Thanks for the tip – and yay for more vanity feeds. :-)
Regards,
--
Aristotle
On Sep 27, 2006, at 5:53 PM, Christopher H. Laco wrote:
Ha ha. I just realized that I totally screwed myself out of using this
policy. I'm using a subclass of Test::More, not Test:More itself.
See "Don't 'rm -fr /' when testing" for the topic of that.
Would it be possible, or even desirable to
On Sep 29, 2006, at 5:16 PM, Alexandr Ciornii wrote:
6. Add posibility to module developers (or anybody) to subscribe to
FAIL reports.
Alex,
This ones already possible in a limited sense. I subscribe to
http://testers.cpan.org/author/CLOTHO.rss
to see all pass/fail announcements for my mo
Jonathan Rockway wrote:
Another idea is to have a BitCard (or something) -protected area where
you (or your software) can upload test reports on your behalf. I have
I thought about authentication but it will be too complex for
submitters. With HTTP there whould be no need for that (as I plan
On 10/2/06, Jonathan Rockway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
CPAN Test reports follow a fairly rigid format that computers can easily
detect. I think it's worth auto-whitelisting messages that look like
"FAIL Foo::Bar 3.14_15" or "PASS Hello::World 2.71". The CPAN::Reporter
(?) and CPANPLUS mails l
> CPAN Testers reports must be sent to the cpan-testers mailing list. As
> with
> most mailing lists, email from non-subscribed addresses is held for manual
> review.
CPAN Test reports follow a fairly rigid format that computers can easily
detect. I think it's worth auto-whitelisting messages t
A. Pagaltzis wrote:
* David Golden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-10-02 12:55]:
This creates an interesting quandary: subscribe to the list and
be deluged with thousands of emails or don't subscribe to the
list and accept that your test reports won't show up
immediately.
Good mailing list software
* David Golden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-10-02 12:55]:
> This creates an interesting quandary: subscribe to the list and
> be deluged with thousands of emails or don't subscribe to the
> list and accept that your test reports won't show up
> immediately.
Good mailing list software gives you the op
On 10/1/06, Shlomi Fish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Saturday 30 September 2006 01:16, Alexandr Ciornii wrote:
> 9. AFAIK reports from people not on cpan-testers/AT/perl.org list are
> manually checked. I don't want to subcribe to this list, if I want, I
> read it via NNTP. With http transport
11 matches
Mail list logo