On Sun, Aug 19, 2007 at 05:27:53PM -0700, Eric Wilhelm wrote:
# from [EMAIL PROTECTED]
# on Sunday 19 August 2007 04:56 pm:
Should I also send this patch to RT for D::C ?
Yes, please attach it to the open bug.
http://rt.cpan.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=16379
Thanks very much for
* Christopher H. Laco [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-08-20 14:50]:
Do we even register namespaces any more?
I registered Sub::ArgShortcut just a few months ago. When I
release a 1.0 of XML::Atom::SimpleFeed I’ll register that too.
If I'm wrong, then I'd like to register a few then, like Handel.
Go
Cyberiade.it Anonymous Remailer wrote:
there's a lot of questionable modules being uploaded to CPAN
which create top-level namespaces, very often not even being
self-explanatory. it would be nice to add points for
modules which have registered namespaces. this should encourage
more
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Cyberiade . it Anonymous Remailer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
there's a lot of questionable modules being uploaded to CPAN
which create top-level namespaces, very often not even being
self-explanatory. it would be nice to add points for
modules which have
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Michael G Schwern
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
WRT the intent of forcing the user to get approval for their module: while
it's nice to ask for opinions for your module, it sucks to hold up sharing
your new module with the world while waiting for humans to respond.
