On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 11:58:55AM +0200, Philippe Bruhat (BooK) wrote:
> I would like to collect your impressions about what worked and what
> didn't, what was missing, what you want for next year
For those of us participating remotely, some small amount of video
conferencing, perhaps to allow ea
On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 11:58 AM, Philippe Bruhat (BooK) <
philippe.bru...@free.fr> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> As the main organizer of the next Perl QA Hackathon in Lyon (the venue
> is here: http://goo.gl/maps/mXo15), I would like to collect some feedback
> on the hackathon that we just came back from, in
On 4/15/13 7:06 PM, Jens Rehsack wrote:
> On 15.04.13 18:56, Michael G. Schwern wrote:
>> TL;DR version...
>> IMO we only need to clarify what "conflicts" means and what actions CPAN
>> tools should take.
>>
>> We talked in the Consensus Dome about the need for and meaning of the
>> "conflicts" rel
I use a hackathon to...
* Sync up with what else is going on
* Make long standing hard/bikeshed/warnock'd decisions
* Remind myself that there are people behind the emails
* Be a resource for Test::*, TAP, MakeMaker, build...
* Hack away at code, particularly long standing issues which
haven't b
Philippe Bruhat (BooK) said:
Hi,
As the main organizer of the next Perl QA Hackathon in Lyon (the venue is
here: http://goo.gl/maps/mXo15), I would like to collect some feedback on
the hackathon that we just came back from, in Lancaster.
Great! ^^
I would like to collect your impressions
Hi,
As the main organizer of the next Perl QA Hackathon in Lyon (the venue
is here: http://goo.gl/maps/mXo15), I would like to collect some feedback
on the hackathon that we just came back from, in Lancaster.
I would like to collect your impressions about what worked and what
didn't, what was mis
