> OK, well we can talk about that now and at least get an idea of what
> kind of future we're proofing ourselves against. What do people
> envisage that we might want / be able to capture about a test run?
1. Access to both STDERR and STDOUT, in proper order ('prove' jumbles them),
capturable i
> > 2. Option to inject a clearcut delimiter between tests
> Distinct from, say, outputting a diagnostic between groups of tests?
By 'tests' I'm thinking 'file' with its subtests, so-to-speak, so yes,
anything that is clearly delineatable (LOL) programmatically where one
'file' output stops and a
2. Option to inject a clearcut delimiter between tests
>>>
>>> Distinct from, say, outputting a diagnostic between groups of tests?
>>
>> By 'tests' I'm thinking 'file' with its subtests, so-to-speak, so
yes,
>> anything that is clearly delineatable (LOL) programmatically where
one
>> 'file' o
What about diag() output.
-Original Message-
From: Andy Armstrong [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 19, 2007 6:15 AM
To: Geoffrey Young
Cc: perl-qa@perl.org
Subject: Re: YAML?
On 19 Mar 2007, at 12:51, Geoffrey Young wrote:
> it's really hard to wade through the flurry of act
