On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 05:59:34PM +0200, Cosimo Streppone wrote:
Now, problem.
I'd like to use port 0 to bring up the daemon, so that the test suite
can be run in parallel without port clashes. With port == 0 the TCP/UDP
bind will happen on a random free port.
When the fork + exec'd
On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 04:07:55PM -0400, Michael G Schwern wrote:
is_passing()
As a side effect of this work, there is finally a way to tell if a test is
currently passing. Test::Builder-is_passing(). Its really have I failed
yet, but if you don't think about it too hard
On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 10:16:15PM +0100, Andreas J. Koenig wrote:
On Wed, 28 Jan 2009 13:50:05 +, Tim Bunce tim.bu...@pobox.com
said:
I'm strugling to find a common denominator in these test results:
http://bbbike.radzeit.de/~slaven/cpantestersmatrix.cgi?dist=Devel-NYTProf
I'm strugling to find a common denominator in these test results:
http://bbbike.radzeit.de/~slaven/cpantestersmatrix.cgi?dist=Devel-NYTProf+2.07_94
It would be wonderful if there was some tool that would analyse the
perl -V output and help identify the combinations of settings associated
with
On Mon, Sep 24, 2007 at 08:54:12AM +0200, Andreas J. Koenig wrote:
On Thu, 20 Sep 2007 03:00:59 -0700, Michael G Schwern [EMAIL
PROTECTED] said:
Most CPAN smoke testers wouldn't have caught it because even though they
often
run alphas they usually don't install them. So the
On Thu, Jul 20, 2006 at 10:24:49PM -0500, Andy Lester wrote:
Is there anything out there that will generate a tree of
dependencies, probably based on META.yml?
I figure I can pass in Mason, Test::WWW::Mechanize and Catalyst and
get back a list of dependencies that those require. It
On Wed, Jul 12, 2006 at 03:03:14AM +0200, Tels wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Moin Tim,
On Tuesday 11 July 2006 18:34, Tim Bunce wrote:
I needed some code to trawl through a directory tree parsing perl
modules and scripts to determine their dependencies
I needed some code to trawl through a directory tree parsing perl
modules and scripts to determine their dependencies.
The closest existing CPAN code was Module::Dependency but it fell short
of what I needed. The original author (P Kent) has passed over
maintenance to me. My latest release is:
On Fri, May 13, 2005 at 10:51:56AM +0200, Paul Johnson wrote:
On Fri, May 13, 2005 at 03:00:39PM +1000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Covering the XS portion of the code with gcov is possible, and Devel::Cover
will create all kinds of nice webpages and statistics
On Tue, Apr 12, 2005 at 02:02:07PM -0400, Sam Tregar wrote:
On Tue, 12 Apr 2005, Paul Johnson wrote:
I would do it in the same way as if this had nothing to do with tests.
That is, abstract away the common code into a module, which can also
live under t/
That would be a lot of work in
On Mon, Dec 06, 2004 at 10:28:45PM -0600, Andy Lester wrote:
I think even better than
ok( $expr, name );
or
ok( $expr, comment );
is
ok( $expr, label );
RJBS points out that comment implies not really worth doing, and I
still don't like name because it implies (to me) a unique
On Sat, Jul 24, 2004 at 06:35:44PM +0200, Thomas Klausner wrote:
Hi!
On Fri, Jul 23, 2004 at 03:29:10AM +0100, Tim Bunce wrote:
The DBI gets 9. The one failure is permissions_ok:
permissions_ok (i.e. all files are read/writable by extracting user)
Why is that a kwalitee issue
On Mon, Jul 19, 2004 at 05:00:05AM -0700, Ask Bjoern Hansen wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Tony Bowden) writes:
[...]
The two best ideas we've had so far are to either run the SQL in the
code against a temporary database, and then compare both SHOW CREATE
TABLE outputs, or to use something
On Thu, Jul 22, 2004 at 04:28:08PM +0200, Thomas Klausner wrote:
Hi!
I ran CPANTS today, you can view results here:
http://cpants.dev.zsi.at/
( or http://test1.dev.zsi.at if DNS isn't updated..)
in /metrics there is a yaml-file for each dist
cpants.db (or cpants.db.gz) is a SQLite
On Wed, Jul 07, 2004 at 05:12:20PM -0700, chromatic wrote:
Add no_plan while you're writing tests, run the tests, then when you're
done, change the plan to reflect the number of tests to run. I have a
brain-dead simple vim mapping to do just that.
Aside: Would be good if someone maintained
On Sat, May 15, 2004 at 11:47:39AM +0100, Tim Bunce wrote:
On Fri, May 14, 2004 at 09:16:00PM -0400, stevan little wrote:
Tim, Andy,
Could you take a look at this problem with threaded perl:
t/10examp.ok 165/252Invalid value for shared scalar at
/usr/local/perl583-i/lib
On Tue, May 11, 2004 at 03:23:40PM -0700, chromatic wrote:
On Tue, 2004-05-11 at 15:19, stevan little wrote:
If 5.6.1 is the official minimum, then maybe this brings back up the -w
vs. warnings issue? Since Ovid pointed out that 5.6 was the minimum for
the warnings pragma, and 5.6.1 is
the regular test file).
I think this makes sense, the zppp* files should not have -T in their
she-bang, since the regular test files they load already do. Would you
agree?
Yes.
Tim.
Steve
On May 11, 2004, at 6:06 PM, Tim Bunce wrote:
On Tue, May 11, 2004 at 01:48:47PM -0500, Andy
On Tue, May 11, 2004 at 01:47:46PM -0500, Andy Lester wrote:
I've committed my t/41 and t/42 changes to subversion. They are not the
same as what I submitted to the list.
Is there any reason to now use skip_all? (Remember, you're wearing
the official Test Expert hat now so you need to
On Tue, May 11, 2004 at 01:48:47PM -0500, Andy Lester wrote:
On Tue, May 11, 2004 at 01:58:51PM -0400, stevan little ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Should we put the -T flag in all the test files? I can do that if so.
I'd like to. I'd like every module to think about taint-safety. DBI
On Tue, May 11, 2004 at 05:13:19PM -0400, stevan little wrote:
On May 11, 2004, at 2:47 PM, Andy Lester wrote:
One concern just popped into my head... I'd like to not have to
depend on very recent versions of Test::More. Can you look into
that and make recommendations about what version of
On Tue, May 11, 2004 at 05:44:39PM -0400, stevan little wrote:
A question for the class:
Is specifying the -w flag in the she-bang line sufficient? Or should we
also include $^W = 1 at the top of every file as well?
It's sufficient. And no, don't remove it and don't change to use warnings:;
On Tue, May 11, 2004 at 01:58:51PM -0400, stevan little wrote:
Tim, Andy,
Should we put the -T flag in all the test files? I can do that if so.
Also, i noticed in the most recently checked in versions, that the
'skip_all' code was not included from the patches Andy sent for
On Mon, May 10, 2004 at 01:51:48PM -0400, stevan little wrote:
On May 10, 2004, at 1:46 PM, H.Merijn Brand wrote:
On Mon 10 May 2004 19:40, stevan little [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I have committed my first set of changes to the DBI svn repository. I
am mostly still working on converting the
On Mon, May 10, 2004 at 01:40:55PM -0400, stevan little wrote:
I have committed my first set of changes to the DBI svn repository.
Thanks!
I got an assortment of warnings from various tests. I suspect you
didn't run a plain make test before the checkin (please do).
I've checked in fixes for
On Mon, May 10, 2004 at 10:29:53PM +0100, Tim Bunce wrote:
On Mon, May 10, 2004 at 01:40:55PM -0400, stevan little wrote:
I have committed my first set of changes to the DBI svn repository.
The changes have turned up a warning that ought to have been produced
before: DBI handle cleared
On Sat, May 08, 2004 at 03:16:45PM -0400, stevan little wrote:
On May 8, 2004, at 2:25 PM, Tim Bunce wrote:
Just some (and thanks for that). But there are still a few with
custom ok() subs and some others using the plain Test module.
Tim.
Make that 2 less tests doing the funky stuff
On Fri, May 07, 2004 at 05:14:39PM -0500, Andy Lester wrote:
On Fri, May 07, 2004 at 10:31:49PM +0100, Tim Bunce ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Here's what I'd like to see done soonish:
1. Convert all exisiting test files to Test::More
2. Parts of t/10examp.t should be broken out
On Thu, May 06, 2004 at 05:09:03PM -0600, Jim Cromie wrote:
stevan little wrote:
I looked on the site (http://qa.perl.org/phalanx/), but there was
nothing said about how to get involved in this project. Are you
looking for help? And if so, how can I help?
sure. Pick a module from
On Fri, May 07, 2004 at 03:03:10PM -0400, stevan little wrote:
On May 7, 2004, at 1:37 PM, Tim Bunce wrote:
But still no hoplite has actually adopted the DBI...
Since I would like to get involved here, and (with the exception of
HTML::Template, which is already taken) the module I know
to incorporate?
No rules that say We can only incorporate tests when everything is
covered. ANY amount of test improvement is still an improvement. I
sent some DBI test patches a month ago, and I thought Tim Bunce was
going to reach through the monitor and give me a big wet kiss.
I don't remember
, I've switched to Net::Jabber for this IPC
problem. Thanks to whoever mentioned it, it rocks!
Okay. Thanks for the update.
Tim.
On Sun, 22 Feb 2004 19:05:02 -0600, Scott Bolte wrote:
On Sun, 22 Feb 2004 16:13:01 +, Tim Bunce wrote:
Now I do agree the HTTP
On Tue, Mar 09, 2004 at 11:35:44AM -0400, Brian Cassidy wrote:
Well, that's the basics anyway!
Thanks Brian.
Like Nick, I've never really got into RSS feeds yet. I've always
wanted to find a way to have changes emails to me. Your post prompted
me to look again and I found a couple of
On Sun, Feb 22, 2004 at 06:36:22AM -0600, Scott Bolte wrote:
On Sun, 22 Feb 2004 01:07:38 -0500, Michael G Schwern wrote:
See above. Yes, ssh is not portable enough.
Where is the gap? I have OpenSSH on every Unix platform I
use and, with cygwin's help, all the windows based
On Sun, Nov 02, 2003 at 12:20:11AM -0600, Andy Lester wrote:
Anything that uses the Ceach operator is a prime candidate for
bugginess. Please keep an eye out for them as you do your testing.
Any function that contains Ceach oughta be heavily checked.
Ditto anything that uses Ckeys or
On Tue, Oct 28, 2003 at 05:33:09PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tim Bunce [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Oct 28, 2003 at 02:37:29PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I ran
On Tue, Oct 28, 2003 at 08:03:58AM -0600, Andy Lester wrote:
On Tue, Oct 28, 2003 at 11:24:51AM +, Tim Bunce ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
I'd be very happy if you could find someone willing to rework,
and ideally then extend, the DBI test suite. Parts of it date back
to before perl 5.0
On Mon, Oct 20, 2003 at 11:05:38PM +0200, Paul Johnson wrote:
On Mon, Oct 20, 2003 at 09:34:38PM +0100, Tony Bowden wrote:
On Mon, Oct 20, 2003 at 10:16:40PM +0200, Paul Johnson wrote:
I wrote database in quotes because currently we are talking about a
flat file, written using
On Tue, Oct 21, 2003 at 12:34:44PM -0500, Dave Rolsky wrote:
Anyway, my taint mode experience has been that random things break in very
weird ways when using it.
I'd guess that many extensions don't handle magic properly.
Extension authors rarely add the extra logic, even if they know
what
On Wed, Oct 15, 2003 at 02:10:46PM +0200, Rafael Garcia-Suarez wrote:
Nick Ing-Simmons [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Could we infer that a distribution that comes with several Makefile.PLs
may have an overcomplicated build process, maybe indicating a low
kwalitee ?
Should I infer that to
On Sat, Oct 04, 2003 at 11:47:31PM +0200, Paul Johnson wrote:
On Sat, Oct 04, 2003 at 11:25:27PM +0200, Gabor Szabo wrote:
That's what I thought and recalled from the presentation of Paul
and I understand the red 50 in branch and the red 33 in cond but
I don't understand the green 33 or
On Mon, Feb 19, 2001 at 09:03:00AM -0600, Jarkko Hietaniemi wrote:
On Mon, Feb 19, 2001 at 04:01:25PM +0100, H.Merijn Brand wrote:
On Mon, 19 Feb 2001 08:49:04 -0600, Jarkko Hietaniemi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Feb 19, 2001 at 03:47:12PM +0100, Johan Vromans wrote:
As an active
42 matches
Mail list logo
