ANNOUNCE Test::More/Simple/Builder 0.82

2008-10-14 Thread Michael G Schwern
http://schwern.org/src/Test-Simple-0.82.tar.gz or coming soon on CPAN. Please report bugs via http://code.google.com/p/test-more/issues/list There are some user visible changes which might cause "fixage" for those who depend too closely on the output of Test::Builder. Here's the new features and

Re: ANNOUNCE Test::More/Simple/Builder 0.82

2008-10-15 Thread Michael G Schwern
Ovid wrote: > It's interesting that every time I run this, the 'note' shows up before the > 'diag': > > use Test::More 'no_plan'; > > ok 1, 'first test'; > diag 'this is a diag'; > note 'this is a note'; > ok 1, 'second test'; > __END__ > note.t .. > ok 1 - first test > # this

Re: ANNOUNCE Test::More/Simple/Builder 0.82

2008-10-16 Thread Steve Peters
On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 1:43 PM, Steve Peters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 10:15 PM, Michael G Schwern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> http://schwern.org/src/Test-Simple-0.82.tar.gz >> or coming soon on CPAN. >> >> Please report bugs via >> http://code.google.com/p/test-more/i

Re: ANNOUNCE Test::More/Simple/Builder 0.82

2008-10-16 Thread Michael G Schwern
Steve Peters wrote: >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] t]$ ./perl harness ../lib/constant.t >> ../lib/constant1/97 >> # Failed test at ../lib/constant.t line 115. >> # got: '1' >> # expected: '0' >> # unexpected warning >> # Argument "12 cats" isn't numeric in addition (+) at >> ../lib/Test/Bu

Re: ANNOUNCE Test::More/Simple/Builder 0.82

2008-10-16 Thread Steve Peters
On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 10:15 PM, Michael G Schwern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > http://schwern.org/src/Test-Simple-0.82.tar.gz > or coming soon on CPAN. > > Please report bugs via > http://code.google.com/p/test-more/issues/list > > There are some user visible changes which might cause "fixage" fo

Re: ANNOUNCE Test::More/Simple/Builder 0.82

2008-10-16 Thread Ovid
Michael, Thanks for the great work. I do have a couple of questions/comments. --- On Wed, 15/10/08, Michael G Schwern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > * new_ok() combines a call to new() with isa_ok(). > * note() is like diag() but only shows up in verbose output It's interesting that every time I