Thomas Klausner wrote:
which wasn't
proof-read by any english speaking person yet, so if @you want to:
patches welcome ;-)
s/not longer dreadlocked/no longer dreadlocked/
Hi!
On Wed, Feb 20, 2008 at 11:52:09AM +0100, Aristotle Pagaltzis wrote:
> * Thomas Klausner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-02-19 09:25]:
> > While I was away last week (snowboarding..)
>
> Do you ever do any actual work, Thomas? :-P
Yes, I do!
Here's proof: http://revdev.at (the very fresh (we fin
* Thomas Klausner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-02-19 09:25]:
> While I was away last week (snowboarding..)
Do you ever do any actual work, Thomas? :-P
Regards,
--
Aristotle | “If you can’t laugh at yourself,
you don’t take life seriously enough.”
>
> While I was away last week (snowboarding..) CPANTS seems to have acquired
> yet another bug. As soon as I have some free time (maybe tomorrow, but
> at the latest this weekend during FOSDEM) I'll take a look.
>
> In the meantime: patches welcome :-) (and comit bits are easily
> obtainable too..
Hi!
On Tue, Feb 19, 2008 at 09:23:38AM +0100, Thomas Klausner wrote:
> While I was away last week (snowboarding..) CPANTS seems to have acquired
> yet another bug. As soon as I have some free time (maybe tomorrow, but
> at the latest this weekend during FOSDEM) I'll take a look.
It seems that
Hi!
On Mon, Feb 18, 2008 at 02:34:15PM -0800, Randy J. Ray wrote:
> information. Just a little while ago, I checked the CPANTS site and noticed
> I had a crapload of red marks, almost all of which are wrong (one of the two
> dists doesn't have LICENSE sections in pod, or a "LICENSE" file). But I'
>
> If you have already installed Module::CPANTS::Analyse, then you can
> use the cpants_lint script to locally check the CPANTS metrics of
> your distribution before uploading. This makes the game *much*
> easier ;-)
>
Handy to know :-). In this case, however, I had just browsed the source code
o
Randy J. Ray a écrit :
I've only taken a cursory look at the internals of the
Module::CPANTS::Analyze code, but I noticed that if there is neither
Build.PL or Makefile.PL, you can still trigger an "executable build
file"
flag-- line 101 of Module::CPANTS::Kwalitee::Files.pm uses the same
int
On Feb 18, 2008 5:34 PM, Randy J. Ray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This, combined with the fact that most or all of the other red flags seem to
> be centered around file issues, leads me to suspect that maybe whatever area
> the distros are being un-tarred into is having disk issues?
If you look a
I recently (as in, last night) released very minor revs of two of my CPAN
modules. The releases were mostly just correcting/clarifying licensing
information. Just a little while ago, I checked the CPANTS site and noticed
I had a crapload of red marks, almost all of which are wrong (one of the two
d
10 matches
Mail list logo
