to make a skeleton charter at
testanything.org:
http://testanything.org/wiki/index.php/IETF_WG_Proposed_Charter
Two small and one big question:
1. Who is/are going to be the chair(s)?
2. Which area of IETF are we under? You can see the list of areas at
http://www.ietf.org/html.charters/wg-dir.html
I'm a bit disappointed that after all of our effort to get the TAP IETF process
started, we have let it languish. I'd like to restart this effort. We
understand what a lot of basic issues are, so let's get some traction on this.
Background links:
Initial proposal discussion:
http
Ovid wrote:
Folks, this really, really needs to go to the IETF list.
What IETF list?
--
Ahh email, my old friend. Do you know that revenge is a dish that is best
served cold? And it is very cold on the Internet!
On 21 Aug 2008, at 23:37, Michael G Schwern wrote:
What IETF list?
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tap
--
Andy Armstrong, Hexten
Ovid wrote:
One issue Salve raised is that the IETF apparently requires *physical*
meetings three times
a year. Short of people individually ponying up the money, this suggests
some form of
sponsorship. Anyone have any thoughts on this?
I roll to disbelieve.
It seems not like the IETF
(Now copying to appropriate lists, hence the response not being trimmed)
--- On Mon, 18/8/08, Michael G Schwern [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ovid wrote:
One issue Salve raised is that the IETF apparently
requires *physical* meetings three times
a year. Short of people individually ponying up
group* needs to attend IETF meetings thrice yearly, but *the
chairman* of the WG does.
We’re talking about one person, the chair, not about the entire
working group.
Regards,
--
Aristotle Pagaltzis // http://plasmasturm.org/
--- On Mon, 18/8/08, Aristotle Pagaltzis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think your initial mail was misleading and Schwern
promptly
misunderstood you. What Salve brought up is not that the
*working group* needs to attend IETF meetings thrice yearly, but
*the chairman* of the WG does.
Ah, yes
brought up is not that the *working group*
needs to attend IETF meetings thrice yearly, but *the chairman* of the
WG does.
We’re talking about one person, the chair, not about the entire
working group.
As I see it, The purpose of the IETF meetings are to give WG members
well-planned and regular
On Aug 18, 2008, at 02:53, Ovid wrote:
Also, pulling in people developing TAP for things other than Perl
would be good (such as David Wheeler's PostgreSQL work. That came
up a few times as uri/line# diagnostic information isn't quite as
applicable there).
Well, it would be handy if I
--- On Mon, 18/8/08, David E. Wheeler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But I don't have file or line numbers in Test.Builder
(JavaScript). I
don't believe it's possible to get that info in JS,
is it?
This is precicely part of the reason we want non-Perl implementations
represented. The core idea
On Aug 18, 2008, at 15:08, Ovid wrote:
--- On Mon, 18/8/08, David E. Wheeler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But I don't have file or line numbers in Test.Builder
(JavaScript). I
don't believe it's possible to get that info in JS,
is it?
This is precicely part of the reason we want non-Perl
* David E. Wheeler [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-08-18 19:25]:
I don't believe it's possible to get that info in JS, is it?
Just seen: http://eriwen.com/javascript/js-stack-trace/
Regards,
--
Aristotle Pagaltzis // http://plasmasturm.org/
13 matches
Mail list logo
