Re: Why a scoreboard?

2005-04-07 Thread Ricardo SIGNES
* Adam Kennedy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-04-06T23:29:40] > >Finally, the scoreboard does have a purpose. Part of the original idea of > >CPANTS was to provide an automated checklist for a good distribution. > > > >Has a README... check > >Declares a $VERSION... check > >

Re: Why a scoreboard?

2005-04-07 Thread Thomas Klausner
Hi! On Thu, Apr 07, 2005 at 01:29:40PM +1000, Adam Kennedy wrote: I did most of what you asked for on thursday, but in a hurry, so it might be buggy.. > Where's the per-module page on CPANTS that lists these simple check/fail? http://cpants.dev.zsi.at/metrics/ http://cpants.dev.zsi.at/metrics/A

Re: Why a scoreboard?

2005-04-07 Thread Adam Kennedy
Finally, the scoreboard does have a purpose. Part of the original idea of CPANTS was to provide an automated checklist for a good distribution. Has a README... check Declares a $VERSION... check Well behaved tarball... no And as far as I can tell, got sidetracked a

Re: Why a scoreboard?

2005-04-07 Thread Adam Kennedy
Hear hear. I'd rather see better-kwalitee kwalitee tests :) Once the number and value of the kwalitee tests gets higher, it should be expected that people are almost never going to score perfect. Adam K Johan Vromans wrote: Michael G Schwern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Has a README... check B

Re: Why a scoreboard?

2005-04-04 Thread Greg Matheson
Sorry for flattening out the level of the discussion, but ... On Sun, 03 Apr 2005, Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes wrote: > On Sat, Apr 02, 2005 at 10:43:57AM -0500, Ricardo SIGNES wrote: > > * "David A. Golden" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-04-02T05:27:18] > > > Andy Lester wrote: > > > >Why is there a scor

Re: Why a scoreboard?

2005-04-03 Thread Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes
On Sat, Apr 02, 2005 at 10:43:57AM -0500, Ricardo SIGNES wrote: > * "David A. Golden" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-04-02T05:27:18] > > Andy Lester wrote: > > >Why is there a scoreboard? Why do we care about rankings? Why is it > > >necessary to compare one measure to another? What purpose is being

Re: Why a scoreboard?

2005-04-02 Thread Johan Vromans
Michael G Schwern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Has a README... check Bonus points if it differs from the stub, and additional bonus points if it really describes briefly what the product is. Rationale: When browsing READMEs they are often meaningless. > Declares a $VERSION...

Re: Why a scoreboard?

2005-04-02 Thread Michael G Schwern
On Sat, Apr 02, 2005 at 11:29:17AM +, Smylers wrote: > Indeed, and those also have odd effects: rather than being pure measures > of users' abilities/reputations/whatever, their very existence changes > how some users behave, where they do things specifically to increase XP > rather than becaus

Re: Why a scoreboard?

2005-04-02 Thread Ricardo SIGNES
* "David A. Golden" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-04-02T05:27:18] > Andy Lester wrote: > >Why is there a scoreboard? Why do we care about rankings? Why is it > >necessary to compare one measure to another? What purpose is being > >served? > > Why is there XP on perlmonks? Or Karma on Slashdot? Or

Re: Why a scoreboard?

2005-04-02 Thread Smylers
David A. Golden writes: > Andy Lester wrote: > > > Why is there a scoreboard? Why do we care about rankings? Why is > > it necessary to compare one measure to another? What purpose is > > being served? > > Why is there XP on perlmonks? Or Karma on Slashdot? Indeed, and those also have odd e

Re: Why a scoreboard?

2005-04-02 Thread David A. Golden
Andy Lester wrote: Why is there a scoreboard? Why do we care about rankings? Why is it necessary to compare one measure to another? What purpose is being served? Why is there XP on perlmonks? Or Karma on Slashdot? Or for that matter, why do we grade students' exams (particularly, why do we of

Re: Why a scoreboard?

2005-04-02 Thread Michael G Schwern
On Sat, Apr 02, 2005 at 01:43:47AM -0600, Andy Lester wrote: > I'd be far more interested with we can tell about modules on their own > and how they can be improved, rather than make it a competition. Maybe then it should track modules rather than authors. The top AND the bottom along with a qui

Re: Why a scoreboard?

2005-04-01 Thread Andy Lester
Another way to look at it is sometimes its useful to just play with the data, graph it in different ways and see what comes out. Maybe nothing comes out. Maybe something does. Publish the results, see what happens. I understand that, but it seems to have gone past playing data. I'm just not com

Re: Why a scoreboard?

2005-04-01 Thread Michael G Schwern
On Fri, Apr 01, 2005 at 03:30:44PM -0600, Andy Lester wrote: > Why is there a scoreboard? Why do we care about rankings? Why is it > necessary to compare one measure to another? What purpose is being > served? I presume you mean the CPAN scoreboard? Or maybe the Kwalitee scoreboard, it doesn't

Why a scoreboard?

2005-04-01 Thread Andy Lester
Why is there a scoreboard? Why do we care about rankings? Why is it necessary to compare one measure to another? What purpose is being served? xoxo, Andy -- Andy Lester => [EMAIL PROTECTED] => www.petdance.com => AIM:petdance