Hi Sir, thanks for your help and to all those who replied to my queries.
I've already installed Net-SSH-Perl (W32Perl) via the soulcage site and
now I'm using this to access our servers via a workstation.
Again to All, your replies are highly appreciated.
Regards.
Rodel
-Original Message--
I hope I'm not duping any messages here...I just had my list membership
disabled "due to excessive bounces". I don't think i posted anythign
terribly offensive recently ;-)
While it was indeed easy to reenable, I hadn't noticed that my membership
was even disabled b/c the email that had come t
Greetings $Bill,
> 1) Remove all .sigs and other parts of the message that aren't pertinent
> to your reply. (Don't be lazy and force it on the next guy.)
> 2) Respond to each sentence/paragraph immediately below that item and
> keep the quoting intact (the >>> stuff on the left) so people know
Move to TieRegistry, Win32:;Registry is no longer supported.
Cheers,
john
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Jim Hansen
> Sent: Tuesday, April 05, 2005 3:23 AM
> To: Perl-Win32-Users@listserv.ActiveState.com
> Subject: Win32:Registr
Conrad, Bill (ThomasTech) wrote:
> Can some one explain why bottom posting is preferred to top posting?
As far as I'm concerned there is no such thing as bottom posting. It's
really interspersed replies (bottom posting would imply that all of your
reply text would go at the bottom and that's no
Chris Wagner wrote:
Ah Fido-net! Yeah those were the days when "netiquette" evolved. Because
back then we were all on dial up connections, slow ones, and it mattered if
u cut out irrelevant text or not. Now people take bandwidth and drive space
for granted. These damn whipper snappers... ;)
At 02:43 PM 4/4/05 -0500, Charles K. Clarkson wrote:
>Old people, like me, have participated in this particular
>thread for years. I remember discussing top posting on Fido-Net,
>long before the internet was popular. For the most part, younger
>emailers tend to like top posting while older mail
Win32::Registry is deprecated, so TieRegistry is basically all we've got.
It's simple enough to use.
At 12:23 PM 4/4/05 -0700, Jim Hansen wrote:
>Is there a way to travere through a registry key
>without have to move to TieRegistry?
--
REMEMBER THE WORLD TRADE CENTER ---=< WTC 911 >=
-Original Message-
From: Charles K. Clarkson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Mon 4/4/2005 12:55 PM
To: 'perl-win32-users'
Cc:
Subject:RE: [OT] Spam to list
And for the top posters:
Grrr. That should be message, not Madge.
Sorry. That should be edited, not a
Chris Wagner wrote:
At 12:25 PM 4/4/05 -0700, jeff griffiths wrote:
I like the idea of pre-pending a tag to the subject though, and we do
this a lot with other lists ( Komodo-discuss being the one that comes to
mind ). Are there any strong objections to this?
I think that's a bad idea. I'
On Mon, 04 Apr 2005, jeff griffiths wrote:
> I like the idea of pre-pending a tag to the subject though, and we do
> this a lot with other lists ( Komodo-discuss being the one that comes
> to mind ). Are there any strong objections to this?
Yeah, I hate them! :) Especially if the tag is long and
At 12:25 PM 4/4/05 -0700, jeff griffiths wrote:
>I like the idea of pre-pending a tag to the subject though, and we do
>this a lot with other lists ( Komodo-discuss being the one that comes to
>mind ). Are there any strong objections to this?
I think that's a bad idea. I've been on other lists l
Charles K. Clarkson <> wrote:
:
: Then it is convenient for you to go to the previous message
: should this poster have edited the original Madge too much.
Grrr. That should be message, not Madge.
: Bottom posting does not just mean the reply is on the bottom.
: Like my reply here,
And for the top posters:
Grrr. That should be message, not Madge.
Sorry. That should be edited, not audited.
Charles K. Clarkson <> wrote:
: Conrad, Bill (ThomasTech) <> wrote:
:
: : Can some one explain why bottom posting is preferred to top
: : posting?
:
: First, let's define
Conrad, Bill (ThomasTech) <> wrote:
: Can some one explain why bottom posting is preferred to top
: posting?
First, let's define what Bottom Posting and Top Posting are.
Top Posting involves leaving the existing message whole
and intact and posting your reply above that quoted
Chris Wagner wrote:
Neither is "better" as far as I'm concerned. If I'm interleaving my
reply with the old message I go on the bottom. If it's just adding
info/comments I put it on top with just a few lines quoted for
context. If a direct reply to the quoted text, then on the bottom.
I think th
Is there a way to travere through a registry key
without have to move to TieRegistry?
For example:
HKCU\Software\Activestate\General
Has several items to list, mostly DWORD values.
Can I use Win32::Registry to traverse through these
values?
Thanks...
__
Netscape just keeps everything in a flat text file. U can parse it directly
of there might be a package out there to deal with standard mailbox format.
--
REMEMBER THE WORLD TRADE CENTER ---=< WTC 911 >=--
"...ne cede males"
0100
___
P
Neither is "better" as far as I'm concerned. If I'm interleaving my reply
with the old message I go on the bottom. If it's just adding info/comments
I put it on top with just a few lines quoted for context. If a direct reply
to the quoted text, then on the bottom.
--
REMEMBER THE WORLD TRAD
On Mon, 04 Apr 2005, Bharucha, Nikhil wrote:
> I looked at OLE quickly before and I looked at it again -- see you
> worked on it too!
Yeah, I wrote probably 90% of the code in Win32::OLE. :)
> I am trying to access the WS_FTP API. This is done
> by accessing the WsftpApi interfa
Update, the WS_FTP object model doesn't mention the IDispatch interface
but I sent an email to a tech to answer. I guess I could put code
together and see if it works but I would want to hear it from the WS_FTP
folks that they, in fact, currently keep support up to date on this
interface.
-Or
Jan,
I looked at OLE quickly before and I looked at it again -- see you
worked on it too! I am trying to access the WS_FTP API. This is done
by accessing the WsftpApi interface along with 5 other objects in a DLL.
I do see in the notes that there is alpha support for this?
Nick
-Original
$Bill Luebkert wrote:
I appreciate your support, but not your posting etiquette. You
top-posted and didn't remove extraneous text/sig - not to mention
those big header boxes you added.
Can some one explain why bottom posting is preferred to top posting? I
view
my email with a preview box sorted
$Bill Luebkert wrote:
> I appreciate your support, but not your posting etiquette. You
> top-posted and didn't remove extraneous text/sig - not to mention
> those big header boxes you added.
>
Can some one explain why bottom posting is preferred to top posting? I view
my email with a preview bo
On Mon, 04 Apr 2005, Bharucha, Nikhil wrote:
> Does anyone have any other ideas of attacking this problem of
> accessing a COM object in a DLL from Win32 Perl?
It depends on the COM object. If it implements IDispatch then you
could use Win32::OLE to access it.
Cheers,
-Jan
Gerhard Petrowitsch <> wrote:
:
: I'm very sorry, but I have to use Lotus Notes here for my mail,
: which our Corporate IT doesn't seem to be able to configure
: to simply get '>' quoted mail reply to work. So, sorry for my
: posting style. I'd love to have it the way you want it...
:
You, o
Rob,
Thanks for the input but I really need to stay with the Activestate release of
Perl for standardization/stability reasons. The code I am writing is/will be a
Perl module. I will be including this as a "black box" to many future Perl
Win32 programs. Getting this PM to communicate with a
Hi Bill,
I'm very sorry, but I have to use Lotus Notes here for my mail,
which our Corporate IT doesn't seem to be able to configure
to simply get '>' quoted mail reply to work. So, sorry for my
posting style. I'd love to have it the way you want it...
Regarding the OOO replies - I tried it out,
Gerhard Petrowitsch wrote:
> I completely support $Bill's suggestion.
>
> But we could also try to attack the problem at it's root,
> i.e. the lazy oof-replyers. (I say 'lazy' because it must
> be possible to configure an oof reply to whom it responds
> or better, to whom it doesn't).
>
> If we
Hi All!
after my outlook express died unexpectedly
I use Netscape Mail
MY question is:
I used Mail::Transport::Dbx to get outlook express
mail messages/writing mess's to database/
Which perl module i am to use to get
mail messages from Netscape ?
___
Pe
30 matches
Mail list logo
