Hallo Jarkko,
Am Dienstag, 5. August 2003 um 23:12 schriebst du:
This is resolved, there is still a problem with cygwin-1.5.1, when you
link an executable with -lc you get other symbols than linking without
-lc on the link line. Fortunately Jason (the Python maintainer)
figured this
Perl5 Bug Summary
http://rt.perl.org/rt2/NoAuth/perl5/Overview.html
Generated at Mon Aug 11 13:00:02 2003 GMT
---
* Total Issues
* New Issues
* Overview of Open Issues
* Ticket Status By Version
* Requestors
On Fri, Aug 08, 2003 at 09:42:59AM +0200, Johan Vromans wrote:
Do ExtUtils::MakeMaker generated Makefiles have a target that lists
all files that would be installed without installing them?
As a slightly paranoid user, I'd like to see what gets installed
before doing so...
AFAIK, no. You
http://www.iki.fi/jhi/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.iki.fi/jhi/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(or rsync -avz --delete ftp.linux.activestate.com::perl-5.8.x perl-5.8.x)
Nothing major, mainly polishing the corners on various platforms.
I'd like to know how 20537 worked on Cygwin 1.5 (or how this
Keep creating new perl interpreter and freeing it always causes me leaking.
The way I used is that creating perl interpreter once, save it and use it
next time.
-Original Message-
From: Radu Greab [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 3:26 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
yOn Mon, 11 Aug 2003, Rafael Garcia-Suarez wrote:
This Week on perl5-porters (4-10 August 2003)
The bulk of the discussion, this week, was about platform-specific
adjustments for the upcoming 5.8.1, and other testing feedback. However,
don't miss the other interesting topics : v-strings
Automated smoke report for 5.8.1 patch 20617 on solaris - 2.9 (sun4/1 cpu)
(fubar) using /opt/SUNWspro/bin/cc version workshop
Report by Test::Smoke v1.18.02 (perl 5.6.1) [19 hours 19 minutes]
O = OK F = Failure(s), extended report at the bottom
X = test(s) failed under TEST but not under
* SADAHIRO Tomoyuki ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [13 Aug 2003 00:36]:
[...]
May same as ... phrases with \ dDwWsS be removed?
I.e. something like following simply:
\d A digit
\D A nondigit
\w A word character
\W A non-word character
\s A whitespace character
Michael G Schwern wrote:
Doesn't work here.
Perhaps because I patched against bleadperl instead of RC4?
My newbie bad.
I'll concoct a bleadperl patch when I have a mo.
For now, RC4 please.
Either way, any reason autobox can't set up SCALAR, HASH,
et al for the user so the former DWIMs?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The impact looks pretty minimal: the patch needs to do a little bit of
extra work in the optree cleanup/optimisation phase, and on method
lookup all the real magic occurs wrapped in a test:
if ((PL_op-op_flags OPf_SPECIAL) ...)
.. which test will succeed only if the
chocolate boy wrote:
(PS. Could autobox.pm be implemented without a core
patch ? by using optimizer.pm and B::Generate for
example.)
Not using optimize.pm alone. Its peep() hook occurs
too late i.e. outside the scope in which $^H and %^H
are meaningful.
On the big TODO list is making
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ask Bjoern Hansen) writes:
On Mon, 11 Aug 2003, Rafael Garcia-Suarez wrote:
This Week on perl5-porters (4-10 August 2003)
[...]
Er, I should obviously not try moderating mail at 7am. Sorry about
that.
--
ask bjoern hansen, http://www.askbjoernhansen.com/ !try; do();
I'm pleased to announce that the blamelog feature of
the perl repository browser now includes hyperlinks
to the actual patches where lines were first introduced.
Nick Ing-Simmons wrote:
Stas Bekman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Here is a question that is not documented in the perlio pods.
I need to take STDOUT and STDIN filehandles and replace the worker PerlIO
layer (the one that does the actual read/write) with my own layer. I suppose I
could store away
At 16:21 +0100 8/14/03, Robin Houston wrote:
Sorry to bother you all with this, but I can't think who else to ask.
I've had a report that one of my modules (Want-0.06) doesn't build
on Windows XP. The problem appears to be that the linker doesn't know
about the Perl_pop_return function.
Here's the
No, not necessarily, the README file is meant to tell you something
about the module/distribution, so you can decide if you want to
look further. (Where does it call itself a man-page?)
A little example of how to use the module is included in the
synopsis section of the man page, which can be
Nicholas Clark wrote:
Feature, IIRC. Although I can't find the message on p5p about it. IIRC
someone observed that they couldn't name identifiers in Ethiopian, because
there was an Ethiopian character similar in function to _ which wasn't in \w
IIRC this was on the perl-unicode list, and the
On Wed, Aug 6, Steve Grazzini wrote:
On Tue, Aug 05, 2003 at 08:27:13PM -0700, Robert Spier wrote:
The answer for How do I keep my own module/library directory?
seems to be out-of-date:
When you build modules, use the PREFIX option when generating
Makefiles:
So I've
On Tuesday, August 12, 2003, at 01:46PM, John Peacock [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Since there have been reports of 100% clean, I thought it important to highlight
some possible marginal cases.
Good point.
How can I display all of the OpenVMS versions, so
I know what may need patching? I
19 matches
Mail list logo
