> "DS" == Dave Storrs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
DS> On Sat, 8 Sep 2001, Uri Guttman wrote:
>> > "BW" == Brian Wheeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
BW> =item eqv tx, ty, tz *
>>
BW> Bitwise Equivalence all bits in y with z and store the result in
BW> register x.
>>
>> t
On Sat, 8 Sep 2001, Uri Guttman wrote:
> > "BW" == Brian Wheeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> BW> =item eqv tx, ty, tz *
>
> BW> Bitwise Equivalence all bits in y with z and store the result in
> BW> register x.
>
> that is just !(y xor z). we can provide the op but perl as we know
> "JH" == Jeremy Howard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
JH> Uri Guttman wrote:
>> > "BS" == Benjamin Stuhl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>> >> Can anyone think of things I've forgotten? It's been a while since
>> >> I've done numeric work.
>>
BS> ln, asinh, acosh, atanh2?
>
On Sat, 2001-09-08 at 22:24, Uri Guttman wrote:
> > "BW" == Brian Wheeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>
> BW> =item and tx, ty, tz *
>
> BW> Bitwise And all bits in y with z and store the result in register x.
> BW> (x = y & z)
>
> just a minor thought on parrot assembler argument
> "BS" == Benjamin Stuhl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Can anyone think of things I've forgotten? It's been a while since
>> I've done numeric work.
BS> ln, asinh, acosh, atanh2?
dan mentioned log (base anything) but i don't recall ln. and definitely
the arc hyberbolics are in after
> "BW" == Brian Wheeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
BW> =item and tx, ty, tz *
BW> Bitwise And all bits in y with z and store the result in register x.
BW> (x = y & z)
just a minor thought on parrot assembler argument order. dan seems to
have picked the result register to be first.
On Sat, 2001-09-08 at 21:43, Wizard wrote:
> Questions regarding Bitwise operators:
>
> > =item rol tx, ty, tz *
> ...
> > =item ror tx, ty, tz *
>
> Are these with or without carry?
> If not, is there a need for a RCL/RCR (with carry...and carry where)?
>
I'd think without, since I've not see
--- Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Okay, I'm whipping together the "fancy math" section of
> the interpreter
> assembly language. I've got:
>
> sin, cos, tan : Plain ones
> asin, acos, atan : arc-whatevers
> shinh, cosh, tanh : Hyperbolic whatevers
> log2, log10, log
Questions regarding Bitwise operators:
> =item rol tx, ty, tz *
...
> =item ror tx, ty, tz *
Are these with or without carry?
If not, is there a need for a RCL/RCR (with carry...and carry where)?
And what about a negate operator (neg)?
Grant M.
On Saturday 08 September 2001 09:00 am, Dan Sugalski wrote:
> Okay, I'm whipping together the "fancy math" section of the interpreter
> assembly language. I've got:
>
> sin, cos, tan : Plain ones
> asin, acos, atan : arc-whatevers
> shinh, cosh, tanh : Hyperbolic whatevers
> log2
On Sat, 2001-09-08 at 15:28, Dan Sugalski wrote:
> At 03:14 PM 9/8/2001 -0500, Brian Wheeler wrote:
> >On Sat, 2001-09-08 at 11:00, Dan Sugalski wrote:
> > > Okay, I'm whipping together the "fancy math" section of the interpreter
> > > assembly language. I've got:
> > >
> > > sin, cos, tan
At 03:14 PM 9/8/2001 -0500, Brian Wheeler wrote:
>On Sat, 2001-09-08 at 11:00, Dan Sugalski wrote:
> > Okay, I'm whipping together the "fancy math" section of the interpreter
> > assembly language. I've got:
> >
> > sin, cos, tan : Plain ones
> > asin, acos, atan : arc-whatevers
> > s
On Saturday 08 September 2001 04:14 pm, Brian Wheeler wrote:
> While not math, per se, there are bitops (and, or, not, xor, eqv) and
> shifts (though they can be simulated by "mul tx,ty,(2^bits)" and "div
> tx,ty,(2^bits)")
There will be bitops.
>
> I doubt rolls would be useful :)
Vuja de.
>
On Sat, 2001-09-08 at 11:00, Dan Sugalski wrote:
> Okay, I'm whipping together the "fancy math" section of the interpreter
> assembly language. I've got:
>
> sin, cos, tan : Plain ones
> asin, acos, atan : arc-whatevers
> shinh, cosh, tanh : Hyperbolic whatevers
> log2, log10, l
On Sat, Sep 08, 2001 at 02:55:36PM -0400, Uri Guttman wrote:
> zap is an ibm 360/370/390 assembler op code and i bet they
> trademarked/patented/whatevered its name. :)
>
> Zero and Add Packed.
>
> gawd, i can't believe i remembered that. i don't recall exactly what it
> does but i think it was
> "MGS" == Michael G Schwern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
MGS> On Sat, Sep 08, 2001 at 12:00:24PM -0400, Dan Sugalski wrote:
>> pow: Raise x to the y power
MGS> You forgot biff, zap and womp!
zap is an ibm 360/370/390 assembler op code and i bet they
trademarked
> "DS" == Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> 1/x is often handy, although maybe not enough to justify its own opcode.
>> (It is often used in other calculations, however, so perhaps one opcode
>> would be better than 3.)
>>
>> sqrt has traditionally been provided in langua
At 02:43 PM 9/8/2001 -0400, Sterin, Ilya wrote:
>Sorry, went a little of our the way. Will keep my mouth shut on those thing
>from now on:-)
I don't mind if folks get critical about other programmers. Just not here.
:) I think we've got an advocacy list kicking around somewhere...
On Sat, Sep 08, 2001 at 12:00:24PM -0400, Dan Sugalski wrote:
> pow : Raise x to the y power
You forgot biff, zap and womp!
--
Michael G. Schwern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>http://www.pobox.com/~schwern/
Perl6 Quality Assurance <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Kwalitee Is Job One
Sorry, went a little of our the way. Will keep my mouth shut on those thing
from now on:-)
> -Original Message-
> From: Dan Sugalski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Saturday, September 08, 2001 2:19 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: Links
>
>
> At 02:24 PM 9/8/2001 -0400, Ster
At 02:24 PM 9/8/2001 -0400, Sterin, Ilya wrote:
>Let's see. Illegible syntax in his opinion is mostly presented in regular
>expression syntax. Is he a dumb @$$ or what.
It would probably be best, all things considered, if we could refrain from
criticizing individuals or languages. (With the ex
> -Original Message-
> From: raptor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Saturday, September 08, 2001 8:11 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Links
>
>
> All I found with lycos... but no speed comparison only mumbo-jumbo :
> http://language.perl.com/versus/
> http://www.jvoegele.com/sof
At 01:38 PM 9/8/2001 -0400, Bryan C. Warnock wrote:
>On Saturday 08 September 2001 12:00 pm, Dan Sugalski wrote:
> > Okay, I'm whipping together the "fancy math" section of the interpreter
> > assembly language. I've got:
> >
> > sin, cos, tan : Plain ones
> > asin, acos, atan : arc-w
On Saturday 08 September 2001 12:00 pm, Dan Sugalski wrote:
> Okay, I'm whipping together the "fancy math" section of the interpreter
> assembly language. I've got:
>
> sin, cos, tan : Plain ones
> asin, acos, atan : arc-whatevers
> shinh, cosh, tanh : Hyperbolic whatevers
> log2,
At 12:29 PM 9/8/2001 -0400, Buddha Buck wrote:
>Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Okay, I'm whipping together the "fancy math" section of the interpreter
> > assembly language. I've got:
>
>
>
> > Can anyone think of things I've forgotten? It's been a while since I've
> > done numeric
At 12:12 PM 9/8/2001 -0400, Uri Guttman wrote:
> > "DS" == Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> DS> Can anyone think of things I've forgotten? It's been a while since
> I've
> DS> done numeric work.
>
>i am not being picky, but there is secant, and arc hyperbolics too. you
>can deri
Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Okay, I'm whipping together the "fancy math" section of the interpreter
> assembly language. I've got:
> Can anyone think of things I've forgotten? It's been a while since I've
> done numeric work.
Uri mentioned exp(x) = e^x, but I think if you are
> "DS" == Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
DS> Okay, I'm whipping together the "fancy math" section of the interpreter
DS> assembly language. I've got:
DS> sin, cos, tan : Plain ones
DS> asin, acos, atan : arc-whatevers
DS> shinh, cosh, tanh : Hyperbolic whate
Okay, I'm whipping together the "fancy math" section of the interpreter
assembly language. I've got:
sin, cos, tan : Plain ones
asin, acos, atan: arc-whatevers
shinh, cosh, tanh : Hyperbolic whatevers
log2, log10, log: Base 2, base 10, and explicit base logarithms
All I found with lycos... but no speed comparison only mumbo-jumbo :
http://language.perl.com/versus/
http://www.jvoegele.com/software/langcomp.html
http://www.geocities.com/tablizer/langopts.htm
http://www.cs.usyd.edu.au/~sholden/pythonperl.html
http://www.pixeldate.com/dev/comparison/
=
iVA
"Bryan C. Warnock" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thursday 06 September 2001 08:53 am, Dave Mitchell wrote:
> > But surely %MY:: allows you to access/manipulate variables that are in
> > scope, not just variables are defined in the current scope, ie
> >
> > my $x = 100;
> > {
> > print $MY::{
Robert Spier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
> >>How about something a little more explicit than XXX, like TODO or FIXME?
> > Some syntax-highlighting editors highlight "XXX". Let's use that feature.
>
>
> Which ones? emacs doesn't seem to do it by default.
>
>
> > And how can you get more explici
32 matches
Mail list logo
