On Thu, 14 Feb 2002, Dan Sugalski wrote:
To allocate memory that is GCable, call Parrot_allocate(interpreter,
size). Then stash the pointer and size in your buffer header, or
it'll go missing later. To resize a chunk of memory, call
mem_realloc(interpreter, from, oldsize, newsize).
Having
See if this has any value, I thought it might.
For a toy compiler I'm working on, I also started a trivial translator that
does three address code - Parrot assembler. While its currently
a very simple script, I'm making it do named lexicals, named globals
and register tracking. Then it'd be nice
On Fri, 15 Feb 2002, Alex Gough wrote:
On Thu, 14 Feb 2002, Dan Sugalski wrote:
To allocate memory that is GCable, call Parrot_allocate(interpreter,
size). Then stash the pointer and size in your buffer header, or
it'll go missing later. To resize a chunk of memory, call
At 2:56 PM + 2/15/02, Alex Gough wrote:
On Thu, 14 Feb 2002, Dan Sugalski wrote:
To allocate memory that is GCable, call Parrot_allocate(interpreter,
size). Then stash the pointer and size in your buffer header, or
it'll go missing later. To resize a chunk of memory, call
At 11:38 AM -0500 2/15/02, Michael Maraist wrote:
On Fri, 15 Feb 2002, Alex Gough wrote:
On Thu, 14 Feb 2002, Dan Sugalski wrote:
To allocate memory that is GCable, call Parrot_allocate(interpreter,
size). Then stash the pointer and size in your buffer header, or
it'll go missing
If people have different opinions on intermediate code generation [...]
I have been working in a compiler for an intermediate language that I call
P-- (obviously inspired in C--) for now. [...]
I find it encouraging and exciting that people are already building
useful middlecode on top of
On Thu, Feb 14, 2002 at 08:22:49PM -0500, Dan Sugalski wrote:
If you choose to accept it, is to dig out the computed goto and
switch runops cores from the archives, dust 'em off and get them up
to snuff with the current sources.
Takers, anone?
I spent about an hour on this last night and
On Fri, Feb 15, 2002 at 12:13:57PM -0800, Steve Fink wrote:
Looks like the commits since last night have re-broken pbc2c.pl, so
it'll be a little while before I can generate a patch.
My mistake, it was just that 'make clean' deleted my .pbc file and
pbc2c.pl wasn't very good about reporting
Original Message
Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: (qmail 14099 invoked from network); 14 Feb 2002 22:51:43 -
Received: from eros.cs.jhu.edu (128.220.223.245)by hilbert.umkc.edu with SMTP; 14 Feb
2002 22:51:43 -
Received: from
I just committed some modifications to make panics produce better
output. I'll paste a sample here (I got it by commenting out a line in
embed.c, thus inducing a panic in pmc_new):
Parrot VM: PANIC: Null vtable used!
C file c:\brent\visual studio projects\perl
Index: exceptions.c
===
RCS file: /home/perlcvs/parrot/exceptions.c,v
retrieving revision 1.2
diff -u -r1.2 exceptions.c
--- exceptions.c15 Feb 2002 23:20:31 - 1.2
+++ exceptions.c16 Feb 2002 03:55:58 -
Thanks, applied.
--
Dan
--it's like this---
Dan Sugalski even samurai
[EMAIL PROTECTED] have teddy bears and even
Oops, my patch introduced some more warnings in other files. Here's a
fixed version.
Index: exceptions.c
===
RCS file: /home/perlcvs/parrot/exceptions.c,v
retrieving revision 1.2
diff -u -r1.2 exceptions.c
--- exceptions.c
At 11:07 PM -0500 2/15/02, Josh Wilmes wrote:
Oops, my patch introduced some more warnings in other files. Here's a
fixed version.
In instead. Thanks.
--
Dan
--it's like this---
Dan Sugalski
At 12:35 PM -0800 2/15/02, Steve Fink wrote:
Anyway, here's a patch to repair pbc2c.pl, combined with removing
typecasts in various places throughout the code. It probably won't
work for Windows yet. The libparrot.a target might need to be modified
to at least prevent it from confusing make on
Fixes some bad returns, some unused variables, and some mismatched formats.
This should be distinct from my other pending patch, which changes the way
function pointers are handled outside of the JIT.
--Josh
Index: embed.c
===
Josh Wilmes:
# --- misc.c15 Feb 2002 02:30:02 - 1.11
# +++ misc.c16 Feb 2002 05:36:46 -
# @@ -277,6 +277,7 @@
# info.phase = PHASE_WIDTH;
# goto AGAIN;
# }
# +break;
#
#
At 22:02 on 02/15/2002 PST, Brent Dax [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
# +++ misc.c 16 Feb 2002 05:36:46 -
It's not indenting the nested switch() statements the same as their
matched break;s.
Hrm. It _should_ be indented OK.. not sure what happened there- can
whoever applies the patch make
array.pmc: (in function Parrot_Array_move_to)
array.pmc:70:18: Stack-allocated storage pmc-data reachable from parameter pmc
A stack reference is pointed to by an external reference when the function
returns. The stack-allocated storage is destroyed after the call, leaving a
dangling
19 matches
Mail list logo
