David Whipp [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Piers Cawley wrote:
Maybe we should just say 'sod it' and implement the entire Smalltalk
Collection hierarchy and have done with it? Sets, bags, hashes
(dictionaries for the Smalltalker), whatever, all have their uses...
I'm not sure if you were being
This came up in a discussion on London.pm about Damian's Perl 6 talk,
which led us to wonder about control exceptions and how they're
handled. At the moment, control exceptions fall into the 'vaguely
handwavy' category, and what follows is my attempt to work out how I
think they should behave...
Damian Conway [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Uri Guttman wrote:
but what simon was saying (and i agree) is the the pair IS a single
item. it becomes the key and its value is 'scalars'.
No. If it's a PAIR, then its key is the key and its value is the value.
hashes can now take objects as keys
Hi Leo,
This should be - from my (imcc) POV - reflected by these IN/OUT
settings:
op set(in PMC, in INT)
op set(in PMC, in STR)
op set(in PMC, in NUM)
op set(out PMC, in PMC) # ok, $1 points to $2 now
# P[i] = x
op set(in PMC, in intkey, in x)
# P[KEY] = x
op set(in
# New Ticket Created by Leopold Toetsch
# Please include the string: [perl #16960]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# URL: http://rt.perl.org/rt2/Ticket/Display.html?id=16960
imcc and assembler did allow duplicate labels.
Fix for imcc is ready and
Perl6 Summary for the week ending 2002-09-01
Well, it's been a week. Damian came to London and made our heads spin;
perl6-language erupted in a flurry of interesting, high signal/noise
threads; Parrot reached its 0.0.8 release; Larry made many of his
wonderfully unexpected but
Hi team.,
thanx in advance
Can you provide me a link or a zip file where i can download perl6 or
perl 5.6 for solaris 7 or solaris 8
Would be appreciated..
cheers
venkat
-Original Message-
From: Piers Cawley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 03, 2002 4:57 PM
Using Mac OS X 10.1.5, on which I've successfully built 0.0.6 and 0.0.7.
[localhost:~/parrot.1/languages/imcc] chris% make
anyop.o definition of _n_symbols in section (__DATA,__common)
make: *** [imcc] Error 1
[localhost:~/parrot.1/languages/imcc] chris%
Then when I try to run a simple
Angel Faus wrote:
Hi Leo,
This should be - from my (imcc) POV - reflected by these IN/OUT
settings:
op set(in PMC, in INT)
op set(in PMC, in STR)
op set(in PMC, in NUM)
op set(out PMC, in PMC) # ok, $1 points to $2 now
# P[i] = x
op set(in PMC, in intkey, in x)
# P[KEY] = x
On Mon, 2 Sep 2002 23:50:18 -0400 (EDT), Trey Harris wrote:
In a message dated 2 Sep 2002, Aaron Sherman writes:
{
my $x = 2;
my $y = The grass is green;
$y =~ /(gr\w+) {let $x = $1}/;
}
Yes. $0{x} would be set to grass. A lexical
# New Ticket Created by Kevin Falcone
# Please include the string: [perl #16962]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# URL: http://rt.perl.org/rt2/Ticket/Display.html?id=16962
Someone asked on IRC this morning about what ICU is. They mentioned
not finding
Leon Brocard sent the following bits through the ether:
I have a weird bug where concatenation is sometimes failing
Well, this bug is still here. I saw some patches fly by but which of
them is the right patch and can it be applied please? ;-)
Leon
--
Leon
On Tue, 3 Sep 2002, Chris Dutton wrote:
Using Mac OS X 10.1.5, on which I've successfully built 0.0.6 and 0.0.7.
[localhost:~/parrot.1/languages/imcc] chris% make
anyop.o definition of _n_symbols in section (__DATA,__common)
make: *** [imcc] Error 1
imcc had hard-wired version
Hmm... I think I'd rather see
my $foo is Bag = array.as('Bag');
The idea being that one could treat hashes and arrays as syntactic
vitamins meaning 'Dictionary' (to use the Smalltalk term) and
'OrderedCollection', but all Collections would implement an Cas
method allowing conversion
Peter Haworth wrote:
Also the different operators used (:= inside the rule, = inside the code)
seems a bit confusing to me; I can't see that they're really doing anything
different:
/ $x := (gr\w+) /vs/ (gr\w+) { let $x = $1 } /
Shouldn't they both use C := ?
Depends on
# New Ticket Created by Andy Dougherty
# Please include the string: [perl #16965]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# URL: http://rt.perl.org/rt2/Ticket/Display.html?id=16965
This patch gathers together different testing dependencies into a new
test_prep
At 8:48 AM -0600 9/3/02, Luke Palmer wrote:
Hmm... I think I'd rather see
my $foo is Bag = @array.as('Bag');
The idea being that one could treat hashes and arrays as syntactic
vitamins meaning 'Dictionary' (to use the Smalltalk term) and
'OrderedCollection', but all Collections
# New Ticket Created by Andy Dougherty
# Please include the string: [perl #16968]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# URL: http://rt.perl.org/rt2/Ticket/Display.html?id=16968
The following patch causes Configure to generate a 'myconfig' file that
On Tue, 2002-09-03 at 11:35, Ken Fox wrote:
Peter Haworth wrote:
Also the different operators used (:= inside the rule, = inside the code)
seems a bit confusing to me; I can't see that they're really doing anything
different:
/ $x := (gr\w+) /vs/ (gr\w+) { let $x = $1 } /
On Monday, September 2, 2002, at 03:44 AM, Damian Conway wrote:
my Date $date .= new('Jun 25, 20002');
H. That's a very interesting idea.
I like it.
Looks pretty groovy to me too. It looks like the .=
operator, no longer being employed as a string appender,
now means use the class I
In a message dated Tue, 3 Sep 2002, Buddha Buck writes:
I suspect that, if it makes sense to say
$foo = $date.method;
then it would also make sense to say
$date .= $foo;
as well.
Interesting, that first line
$foo = $date.method;
I need a bit of a refresher here, as my searches of the
Trey Harris wrote:
In a message dated Tue, 3 Sep 2002, Buddha Buck writes:
I suspect that, if it makes sense to say
$foo = $date.method;
then it would also make sense to say
$date .= $foo;
as well.
Interesting, that first line
$foo = $date.method;
I need a bit of a refresher
At 4:21 PM -0400 9/3/02, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Trey Harris [EMAIL PROTECTED]
no strict 'refs';
my Date $date;
$date .= 'Sep 21, 1963';
There is a method name there--'Date::Sep 21, 1963'.
But that's my point. You wouldn't have to put the method name or the class
On Monday, September 2, 2002, at 03:44 AM, Damian Conway wrote:
my Date $date .= new('Jun 25, 20002');
H. That's a very interesting idea.
I like it.
Looks pretty groovy to me too. It looks like the .=
operator, no longer being employed as a string appender,
now means use
From: Dan Sugalski [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This will potentially get out of hand quickly
I don't think this is a case where out-of-hand-generalization is necessary.
I'm only saying that there could be a handy shorthand for a single very
common case. Nevertheless, I'll simplify the proposal. Oh, and
Damian Conway:
# Though I expect he probably will, since treating classes as
# first class entities in Perl 6 implies that capability
# (amongst many others).
I fear we're treading a little too close to classes being the new
filehandles--relatively limited entities with no sigils that confuse
Sean O'Rourke:
# Would it be possible to rename perl6-internals now to something
# better like parrot-internals?
#
# I think aliases can take care of this, though I'm not the
# sysadmin. Maybe it makes people feel better to send mail to
# parrot-internals instead of perl6-internals, but I
At 6:03 PM -0400 9/3/02, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Dan Sugalski [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This will potentially get out of hand quickly
I don't think this is a case where out-of-hand-generalization is necessary.
I'm only saying that there could be a handy shorthand for a single very
common case.
From: Dan Sugalski [EMAIL PROTECTED]
How about a JPEG object? Might take a string with the image data, an
array with byte data, a filehandle that's got the data to it.
But those situations are all covered by the #= concept: call the new method
passing the right argument. So for a JPEG that
my Date $date .= new('June 25, 2002');
If we're assuming that Cmy Date $date creates an Cundef but isa(Date)
object, then that object should be able to overload its assignment operator.
I don't know what the perl6 syntax will be, but something along the lines of
class Date
{
method
At 7:48 PM -0400 9/3/02, Miko O'Sullivan wrote:
From: Dan Sugalski [EMAIL PROTECTED]
How about a JPEG object? Might take a string with the image data, an
array with byte data, a filehandle that's got the data to it.
But those situations are all covered by the #= concept:
We call that
Damian Conway:
# Neither. You need:
#
# $roundor7 = rx /roundascii+[17]/
#
# That is: the union of the two character classes.
How can you be sure that roundascii is implemented as a character
class, as opposed to (say) an alternation?
--Brent Dax [EMAIL PROTECTED]
@roles=map {Parrot
On Tue, Sep 03, 2002 at 04:59:44PM +, Andy Dougherty wrote:
The following patch causes Configure to generate a 'myconfig' file that
summarizes the current parrot configuration (much like perl5's 'myconfig'
or perl -V output).
This patch also includes makefile targets to generate OK
On Tue, 3 Sep 2002, Brent Dax wrote:
Damian Conway:
# Neither. You need:
#
# $roundor7 = rx /roundascii+[17]/
#
# That is: the union of the two character classes.
How can you be sure that roundascii is implemented as a character
class, as opposed to (say) an alternation?
On Tue, 3 Sep 2002, Luke Palmer wrote:
On Tue, 3 Sep 2002, Brent Dax wrote:
Damian Conway:
# Neither. You need:
#
# $roundor7 = rx /roundascii+[17]/
#
# That is: the union of the two character classes.
How can you be sure that roundascii is implemented as a character
On Tue, Sep 03, 2002 at 09:57:31PM -0600, Luke Palmer wrote:
On Tue, 3 Sep 2002, Brent Dax wrote:
Damian Conway:
# Neither. You need:
#
# $roundor7 = rx /roundascii+[17]/
#
# That is: the union of the two character classes.
How can you be sure that roundascii is
On Tue, 2002-09-03 at 17:03, Sean O'Rourke wrote:
On Tue, 3 Sep 2002, Markus Laire wrote:
Would it be possible to rename perl6-internals now to something
better like parrot-internals?
I think aliases can take care of this, though I'm not the sysadmin.
Maybe it makes people feel better
On Tue, Sep 03, 2002 at 02:55:05PM +, Andy Dougherty wrote:
# New Ticket Created by Andy Dougherty
# Please include the string: [perl #16965]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# URL: http://rt.perl.org/rt2/Ticket/Display.html?id=16965
This
On Wed, 2002-09-04 at 00:01, Sean O'Rourke wrote:
On Tue, 3 Sep 2002, Luke Palmer wrote:
On Tue, 3 Sep 2002, Brent Dax wrote:
Damian Conway:
# $roundor7 = rx /roundascii+[17]/
#
# That is: the union of the two character classes.
How can you be sure that
39 matches
Mail list logo
