On Fri, Oct 18, 2002 at 07:36:40PM +, Andy Dougherty wrote:
> This patch ought to be harmless. I'd appreciate it if someone else could
> give it a try, and, if it works, go ahead and commit it.
Works fine on x86 (Debian GNU/Linux), arm (er Debian GNU/Linux) and
sparc (guess?). I didn't try it
At 1:38 PM +0100 10/18/02, Simon Cozens wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Rhys Weatherley) writes:
int x = ...;
int y = (short)x;
The value of x is truncated to 16 bits, and then sign-extended
to int. I'm looking for something like the "conv.i2" instruction
in IL, or "i2s" in JVM.
One co
On Sun, Oct 13, 2002 at 10:16:04PM +, Simon Glover wrote:
> This patch:
>
> 1) Fixes some minor nits in the assembler documentation (mostly POD
> formatting issues)
>
> 2) Documents the .include macro
>
> 3) Fixes a bug in the code that handles includes: we weren't stripping
> of
On Thu, Oct 17, 2002 at 12:07:57AM -0700, Steve Fink wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 16, 2002 at 09:19:45PM +0100, Nicholas Clark wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 14, 2002 at 12:09:54AM +, Simon Glover wrote:
> > > Here's a brief test for the PMC, PMC, PMC form of the sprintf op;
> > > as an added bonus, it also
# New Ticket Created by Andy Dougherty
# Please include the string: [perl #18008]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt2/Ticket/Display.html?id=18008 >
On a fresh checkout, I'm getting the following test failure. I'm pretty
sure this is
# New Ticket Created by Andy Dougherty
# Please include the string: [perl #18006]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt2/Ticket/Display.html?id=18006 >
The following patch splits the stack-direction-detection test into 3
separate files.
Rhys Weatherley wrote:
Leopold Toetsch wrote:
[ imcc ]
Yes, I saw that. I haven't yet decided whether to generate pasm
or imcc directly from cscc. I did have some problems getting
"test_spilling.imc" to work. Is this a known issue?
Now yes ;-) Last cleanup changes did break the spillin
At 11:07 AM -0700 10/18/02, Brent Dax wrote:
Dan Sugalski:
# =item void init_pmc(INTERP, PMC* self, PMC* initializer)
...
# For example, if a class has the known properties "Size",
# "Dimension" and "Color", they may be assigned the values 100,
# 101, and 102. If the creator if the PMC knows enoug
On Fri, Oct 18, 2002 at 05:54:08PM +0100, Leon Brocard wrote:
> It looks like the DotGNU weekly IRC meeting will be discussing
> Parrot. Could be interesting:
> http://www.dotgnu.org/pipermail/developers/2002-October/008345.html
The author of that mail needs to learn the difference between GMT and
At 5:54 PM +0100 10/18/02, Leon Brocard wrote:
Rhys Weatherley sent the following bits through the ether:
DotGNU is currently reaching out to other projects in the OSS/FS
world to see how we can help you and how you might be able to
help us.
It looks like the DotGNU weekly IRC meeting will
At 10:49 AM +0200 10/18/02, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
In perl.perl6.internals, you wrote:
A "thing" has three parts, a name (which is optional), a container,
and the contents of the container.
[ ... ]
Well, first it means we need to conceptually split "variables" into
three parts, rather th
# New Ticket Created by Clinton Pierce
# Please include the string: [perl #18003]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt2/Ticket/Display.html?id=18003 >
I sync'd up Parrot for the first time in ages today to get rid of a
PerlArray PMC bug
> -Original Message-
> From: Dan Sugalski [mailto:dan@;sidhe.org]
>
> Okay, it's been a while, I've been out of it, it's time to start
> getting going.
Welcome back!
> Today's first topic: PMCs with real initializers. Here's a snip from
> the updated PDD2:
>
> --
>
> =item v
Dan Sugalski:
# =item void init_pmc(INTERP, PMC* self, PMC* initializer)
# For example, if a class has the known properties "Size",
# "Dimension" and "Color", they may be assigned the values 100,
# 101, and 102. If the creator if the PMC knows enough about
# the class to make the translatio
Rhys Weatherley sent the following bits through the ether:
> DotGNU is currently reaching out to other projects in the OSS/FS
> world to see how we can help you and how you might be able to
> help us.
It looks like the DotGNU weekly IRC meeting will be discussing
Parrot. Could be interesting:
htt
Okay, it's been a while, I've been out of it, it's time to start getting going.
Today's first topic: PMCs with real initializers. Here's a snip from
the updated PDD2:
--
=item void init_pmc(INTERP, PMC* self, PMC* initializer)
This form of the init method takes a single initializer
On Thu, 17 Oct 2002, Jonathan Scott Duff wrote:
: > As a productive prefix, it has limits, but there are actually very few
: > operators that make sense to be bitified, and none of them look like a
: > method name.
:
: Could users redefine how the prefixes work and get the productions for
: free?
On 2002-10-17 at 22:52:49, Smylers wrote:
> Larry Wall wrote:
>
> > $a .| $b# bitwise or
> > $a .! $b# bitwise xor
>
> On glancing down your list I initially misread the bar as an exclamation
> mark. I realize that this is a sample size of one, but certainly in
> this ter
On Fri, 18 Oct 2002, Rhys Weatherley wrote:
> Leopold Toetsch wrote:
>
> > > What is the size of the "int" type? Will it always be 32 bit
> > > or is it "whatever is best for the machine"?
> >
> > It's a Configure option.
>
> That may be a bit of a problem, as C# (and Java for that matter)
> i
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Rhys Weatherley) writes:
> int x = ...;
> int y = (short)x;
>
> The value of x is truncated to 16 bits, and then sign-extended
> to int. I'm looking for something like the "conv.i2" instruction
> in IL, or "i2s" in JVM.
One concievable way to do that is basically have
Brent Dax wrote:
> # I'm a bit confused as to how one creates a user-defined class
> # in Parrot, and makes virtual method calls, accesses fields,
> # and what-not. I can't seem to find a good example (Cola does
> # non-virtual methods only at present).
>
> You don't, at least not yet. Eventual
Leopold Toetsch wrote:
> Have a look at imcc, which is our high level assembler. imcc does
> register allocation and (currently little) optimization. perl6 produces
> IMCC code. imcc can also run the code or write PBC files.
Yes, I saw that. I haven't yet decided whether to generate pasm
or imcc
On Wednesday, October 16, 2002, at 04:55 PM, Smylers wrote:
How about keeping caret for xor?
$a ~^ $b # bitwise xor
$a ^^ $b # logical xor
Hm, the "seagull operator"?
David
--
David Wheeler AIM: dwTheory
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, 17 Oct 2002, Adam D. Lopresto wrote:
> > : It's rare enough to need bitwise things in Perl 5 (outside golf). I'm
> > : hoping that it'll be even rarer in Perl 6, as better interfaces are
> > : designed for the things which at present require flipping individual
> > : bits.
> >
> > I almos
Andy Dougherty (via RT) wrote:
# New Ticket Created by Andy Dougherty
# Please include the string: [perl #17990]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt2/Ticket/Display.html?id=17990 >
Currently, when compiling parrot, I see the following
Hi,
I'm Rhys Weatherley, the author of Portable.NET, which is part
of the DotGNU project. (Put down that flame thrower! I come
in peace. :-) )
DotGNU is currently reaching out to other projects in the OSS/FS
world to see how we can help you and how you might be able to
help us. One of the proj
Steve Fink wrote:
I don't know exactly who has the permissions to do these things, but
I'm pretty sure that if you have commit access then you also have RT
futzing access.
I tried to set the status of my patches to resolved after committing and
got something like "forbidden".
Thanks!
le
Rhys Weatherley sent the following bits through the ether:
> The Portable.NET C# compiler, cscc, is very extensive, and is
> capable of generating output for multiple bytecode formats (IL
> and JVM are currently supported, more or less).
Oh, excellent. If you're already targeting both then it sho
In perl.perl6.internals, you wrote:
> A "thing" has three parts, a name (which is optional), a container,
> and the contents of the container.
[ ... ]
> Well, first it means we need to conceptually split "variables" into
> three parts, rather than two as we have been.
Do you have a more verbose
Shapiro, Jonathan:
# Well, let's look at a few possibilities:
#
# 1)if( $vec bit| $mask bit& $mask2 )
#
# 2)if( $vec b| $mask b& $mask2 )
#
# 3)if( $vec |b $mask &b $mask2 )
#
# 4)if( $vec |bit $mask &bit $mask2 )
What's wrong with 'bitand' and 'bitor' (or e
On Thu, 17 Oct 2002, Brent Dax wrote:
: Shapiro, Jonathan:
: # Well, let's look at a few possibilities:
: #
: # 1) if( $vec bit| $mask bit& $mask2 )
: #
: # 2) if( $vec b| $mask b& $mask2 )
: #
: # 3) if( $vec |b $mask &b $mask2 )
: #
: # 4) if( $vec |bit $mask &bit $mask2 )
On Wed, Oct 16, 2002 at 10:29:39PM +0200, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
> Success ;-) reports, especially from non intel - welcome.
Linux Bagpuss.unfortu.net 2.4.18-rmk7 #10 Sun Jun 23 21:43:05 BST 2002 armv4l unknown
Strictly it's not Intel, because the StrongARM was made by DEC.
Oh, hang on, you meant
On Tue, Oct 15, 2002 at 04:07:51PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> [1]: This comes from a recent discussion on perlmonks where i attempted
> to formally iron things out for people, since i have yet to see anywhere
> thus far on the web where it was actually formalized.
> (formalization being mark
On Wed Oct 16 01:24:16 2002, Erik Lechak wrote:
>
> Is there a module or a script out there that will let me write in
> "freestyle pod" (allowing indentation and reasonable blank line
> placement) and translate it to pod?
Try the Simple Document Format,
http://www.cpan.org/modules/by-authors/id
On Thu, 17 Oct 2002, John Williams wrote:
> > > : It's rare enough to need bitwise things in Perl 5 (outside golf).
I'm
> > > : hoping that it'll be even rarer in Perl 6, as better interfaces are
> > > : designed for the things which at present require flipping individual
> > > : bits.
> > >
> >
On Thursday, October 17, 2002, at 11:49 AM, Shapiro, Jonathan wrote:
Well, let's look at a few possibilities:
1) if( $vec bit| $mask bit& $mask2 )
2) if( $vec b| $mask b& $mask2 )
3) if( $vec |b $mask &b $mask2 )
4) if( $vec |bit $mask &bit $mask2 )
I think I would have an easier tim
# New Ticket Created by Matthew Zimmerman
# Please include the string: [perl #17989]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt2/Ticket/Display.html?id=17989 >
This is probably a minor thing, but confusing (to me) nonetheless.
The file 'test'
On Thu, Oct 17, 2002 at 02:57:22PM -0700, Larry Wall wrote:
> I find those difficult to read--too wordy. At the moment I'm leaning towards
>
> $a .| $b # bitwise or
> $a .& $b # bitwise and
> $a .! $b # bitwise xor
> .! $b # bitwise not
> $a ! $b # logical xor
> !
On 16 Oct 2002, Smylers wrote:
: Larry Wall wrote:
:
: > : $x ~& $y # bitwise and
: > : $x ~| $y # bitwise or
: > :
: > : ~!$x # bitwise not
: >
: > I think I like that. Except now we'll get things like:
: >
: > @x ^~|= @y;
: >
: > Hmm...and then there's:
: >
: > $a ~? $
On Thu, 17 Oct 2002, Adam D. Lopresto wrote:
: Then again, it always seemed odd that you combine two flags with | to turn them both
: on). There could probably be a bitwise type that would overload superpositions
: to do bitwise math instead...
:
: my Bitwise $a = 1; #woohoo, $a and $b are no lo
# New Ticket Created by Andy Dougherty
# Please include the string: [perl #17990]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt2/Ticket/Display.html?id=17990 >
Currently, when compiling parrot, I see the following error message:
cc -g -I../incl
Larry Wall wrote:
> $a .| $b # bitwise or
> $a .! $b # bitwise xor
On glancing down your list I initially misread the bar as an exclamation
mark. I realize that this is a sample size of one, but certainly in
this terminal font those only differ by a single pixel and it's possible
that
Rhys Weatherley wrote:
The Portable.NET C# compiler, cscc, is very extensive, and is
capable of generating output for multiple bytecode formats (IL
and JVM are currently supported, more or less).
Have a look at imcc, which is our high level assembler. imcc does
register allocation and (curre
Rhys Weatherley:
# I'm Rhys Weatherley, the author of Portable.NET, which is
# part of the DotGNU project. (Put down that flame thrower! I
# come in peace. :-) )
Hey. Don't worry--we're not worried about DotGNU. On the other hand,
if you said you were on the actual .Net development group, it
On Thu, 17 Oct 2002, David Wheeler wrote:
: On Thursday, October 17, 2002, at 11:49 AM, Shapiro, Jonathan wrote:
:
: > Well, let's look at a few possibilities:
: >
: > 1) if( $vec bit| $mask bit& $mask2 )
: >
: > 2) if( $vec b| $mask b& $mask2 )
: >
: > 3) if( $vec |b $mask &b $mask2 )
> : It's rare enough to need bitwise things in Perl 5 (outside golf). I'm
> : hoping that it'll be even rarer in Perl 6, as better interfaces are
> : designed for the things which at present require flipping individual
> : bits.
>
> I almost wonder if it's wrong to waste ~ on it...
>
> That woul
46 matches
Mail list logo
