On Sun, Oct 20, 2002 at 12:32:24PM +0200, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
PDD02 specifies the needed methods
exists_keyed
type_keyed
The vtable PDD refers to type_keyed returning the type of the *PMC*. This
isn't accurate given the question. Should we change the PDD ?
perlhash/array
On Sun, 2002-10-20 at 07:39, Leon Brocard wrote:
Leon Brocard sent the following bits through the ether:
It looks like the DotGNU weekly IRC meeting will be discussing
Parrot. Could be interesting:
It was quite interesting. I managed to make it to the early one and
Dan to the later one.
Erik Lechak:
# And in my tinkering around, I compile a lot. I have also added this
# handy little perl script that helps.
#
# I only know that it works on win32 (XP). I could get it working on
# linux if anyone is interested.
#
# Extensions are in win32 speak. But it uses Config.pm so it
Simon Glover wrote:
-for (i = 0; i 5; i++)
+for (i = 0; i 5; i++) {
I'm wondering, how I could miss this.
Anyway, thank you for the report, fix checked in.
leo
Leon Brocard sent the following bits through the ether:
It looks like the DotGNU weekly IRC meeting will be discussing
Parrot. Could be interesting:
It was quite interesting. I managed to make it to the early one and
Dan to the later one. An annotated and abridged chatlog is available:
Clinton A. Pierce wrote:
While working on ...something... I found the need to be able to tell if
a key exists in a PerlHash. Here's the kicker, I don't know what kind
of data's gonna be there: int, float, PMC, or string.
[ snipp ]
exists Px[key], branch
PDD02 specifies the needed
If memory serves me right, Leon Brocard wrote:
It looks like the DotGNU weekly IRC meeting will be discussing
Parrot. Could be interesting:
http://www.dotgnu.org/pipermail/developers/2002-October/008345.html
A condensed summary of the IRC meetings have been posted as :-
Bryan C. Warnock wrote:
Interesting read. Dan skimmed over this, but what do .NET (and JVM) doe
for floating point numbers?
The CLI has three floating point types, of which 2 are visible
to C# and a third is used by the engine. These are float32,
float64, and native float. The first two
If memory serves me right, Bryan C. Warnock wrote:
It looks like we're going to need 8,16,32,64 bit types...
Interesting read. Dan skimmed over this, but what do .NET (and JVM) doe
for floating point numbers?
IL (Ecma-335)
--
134.1.1 Floating Point
14 The floating
The ops described in PDD 6 and docs/parrot_assembly.pod for
scratchpads appear to be subtly different from the ones actually in
core.ops. In particular, i was led astray by the docs referring to the
newpad op and core.ops implementing new_pad. which is it supposed
to be? =)
I started
While working on ...something... I found the need to be able to tell if a
key exists in a PerlHash. Here's the kicker, I don't know what kind of
data's gonna be there: int, float, PMC, or string.
After hunting around in t/perlhash.t I found a few examples of checking for
keys that don't
Mark J. Reed wrote:
On 2002-10-17 at 22:52:49, Smylers wrote:
... I initially misread the bar as an exclamation mark. I realize
that this is a sample size of one ...
Make that a sample size of two.
Well, not really. (Presumably there are many other people who also read
Larry's mail
Larry Wall wrote:
$a .! $b # bitwise xor
$a ! $b # logical xor
! $b # logical not
I like the notion that binary ! means that the two sides are sharing
one not. That's the definition of XOR in a nutshell.
I like that too. It also means that C!! and C.!! become the
Somebody fairly recently recommended some decent fixed-width
typefaces.
I think it may have been MJD, but I can't find the reference right now
(could be at work).
Michael Schwern recently suggested Monaco,
Neep or, if you can find them, Mishawaka or ProFont.
I investigated and found this link
Me wrote:
Somebody fairly recently recommended some decent fixed-width
typefaces. I think it may have been MJD ...
Michael Schwern recently suggested Monaco, Neep or, if you can find
them, Mishawaka or ProFont.
Ah, yes. That's what I was failing to recollect. (Apologies to both
MJD
What's the plan on having properties, or attributes (depending on how
far we're taking it), on individual characters in a string? I think
it's an essential feature, as Lisp has shown us. If there's an
argument otherwise, I'm all ears.
Luke
16 matches
Mail list logo
