According to PDD15, defining a method called __find_method() in my PASM
or PIR would allow Perl 5 AUTOLOAD-like behavior.
I can override __get_string() -- and it's tested in t/pmc/delegate.t.
Is __find_method() workable yet? If not, how would I go about adding
it?
t/pmc/delegate.t looks like th
I've updated the docs for the ops parsing system.
make html-clean; make html
You'll find it under Perl Modules/Operations and Ops/Tools.
Mike
On Sun, 2004-04-04 at 10:17, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
> .sub __init method
>
> is AFAIK the constructor. It gets called automatically for all parent
> classes and the class itself and is the best place to put attributes for
> objects in place and set these to their default values.
I personally wan
> "C" == Chris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
C> How about some variation on "create"?
just please make sure it has the missing 'e'. :)
uri
--
Uri Guttman -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.stemsystems.com
--Perl Consulting, Stem Development, Systems Architecture, Design and C
How about some variation on "create"?
---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.593 / Virus Database: 376 - Release Date: 20/02/2004
Jens Rieks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
> Chromatic and I are unsure what the best name for a constructor method is.
.sub __init method
is AFAIK the constructor. It gets called automatically for all parent
classes and the class itself and is the best place to put attributes for
objects in pl
Hi,
Chromatic and I are unsure what the best name for a constructor method is.
Leo, is it time-consuming to fix IMCC in order to make it possible to use
"new" as a method name?
Is there something special to consider to avoid problems regarding several
languages? Is BUILD a good name for a non
On Sun, Mar 28, 2004 at 02:11:01AM -0500, Will Coleda wrote:
> use lib qw(../lib ../../lib ../../../lib);
> use Parrot::Config;
> my $path = $INC{"Parrot/Config.pm"};
> $path =~ s:lib/Parrot/Config.pm$::;
>
> to figure out the path to the parrot executable.
>
> Is this too evil, or should I go a
On the Module-Build[1] mailing-list[2] we are currently discussing
plugin architectures which will allow users to modify and extend
Module::Build's functionality. One thing that we would like to have
happen is that when the transition is made to parrot we'd like it to be
possible to script Modu
Object gurus, please have a look at t/pmc/object-meths_17. Is the code
ok? Is it failing because init order is really wrong?
BTW I tried to add this test as a TODO but this seems not to work.
leo
10 matches
Mail list logo
