Re: new PMCs

2004-07-06 Thread Leopold Toetsch
Dan Sugalski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ..., it seems worth making: new Px a synonym for new Px, Undef Makes sense, yes. leo

Re: Python bytecode notes, part one

2004-07-06 Thread Leopold Toetsch
Dan Sugalski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The translation for a number of the python ops depends on whether we're going with runtime stack action or compile-time stack-register translations. My experiments[1] show that the latter should be doable, the more because ... BINARY_op: restore

Perl Passport?

2004-07-06 Thread Kelvin Wu
dunno whether this is the right place to post, but i am looking for a solution(for both win32 and linux), something like microsoft passport, one login account can be used cross over domain names. thanks.

[perl #30604] [BUG] Re: cvs commit: parrot/t/pmc complex.t

2004-07-06 Thread via RT
# New Ticket Created by Dennis Rieks # Please include the string: [perl #30604] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # URL: http://rt.perl.org:80/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=30604 Hi, make test fails again, now in t\pmc\complex:

Time to change the (perl 6) guard!

2004-07-06 Thread Dan Sugalski
Or at least lay on more. Here's the scoop--we need a Perl 6 pumpking, someone to take on the responsibility of making the Perl 6 compiler happen. When we started this whole process these many years ago, we though having one person handle the software end of things was sufficient, but making perl 6

Re: Time to change the (perl 6) guard!

2004-07-06 Thread Austin Hastings
--- Dan Sugalski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: we need a Perl 6 pumpking, Luke Palmer.

Re: Time to change the (perl 6) guard!

2004-07-06 Thread Dan Sugalski
At 6:21 AM -0700 7/6/04, Austin Hastings wrote: --- Dan Sugalski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: we need a Perl 6 pumpking, Luke Palmer. No fair volunteering other people, though I'd be happy to forward *your* volunteering on to Allison... :-P -- Dan --it's like

Re: Time to change the (perl 6) guard!

2004-07-06 Thread Austin Hastings
--- Dan Sugalski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: At 6:21 AM -0700 7/6/04, Austin Hastings wrote: --- Dan Sugalski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: we need a Perl 6 pumpking, Luke Palmer. No fair volunteering other people, Don't think of it as volunteering other people so much as popular acclaim.

Re: Pie-thon ping

2004-07-06 Thread Dan Sugalski
At 9:56 PM +0200 7/5/04, Leopold Toetsch wrote: Where is Python::Bytecode and where is Dan? I mailed you a copy, but I'll resend and put it up for http fetch in a little bit. I'm back, finally, after weeks of dead hardware doing the repair shuffle and a few days of vacation. (My wife takes the

Re: our own decimal math lib

2004-07-06 Thread Dan Sugalski
At 8:46 AM +0200 7/1/04, Leopold Toetsch wrote: Dan Sugalski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Nope. Nor, if the freeze/thaw system is representation-neutral, as a plugin option for parrot itself. There are just some license issues (or I'm reading it wrong, which is an issue itself :) that make shipping

Re: Python bytecode notes, part one

2004-07-06 Thread brian wheeler
On Mon, 2004-07-05 at 19:27, Dan Sugalski wrote: UNARY_NEGATIVE: restore $Px; new $Py, Undef; $Py = $Px * -1; save $Py | $Px = -1 * $Px Wouldn't something this do what is desired? I'm just guessing, though. Brian

Re: Some tasks for the interested

2004-07-06 Thread Dan Sugalski
At 8:42 AM +0200 7/1/04, Leopold Toetsch wrote: Dan Sugalski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: And I'm now thinking that we want to do mmd for assignment. Dammit. :( Don't think so. We need, ehem, probably, set_complex, get_complex and so on vtables. Complex is a basic type like integer, number, or

Re: Some tasks for the interested

2004-07-06 Thread Leopold Toetsch
Dan Sugalski wrote: At 8:42 AM +0200 7/1/04, Leopold Toetsch wrote: Probably. More a set_imaginary than set_compex, though. I don't think that's needed as such for the benchmark, though. (And should it take a BIGNUM or a NUMVAL?) NUMVAL. But for now, I'm using strings, which works fine. Too

Single Sign-on Re: Perl Passport?

2004-07-06 Thread Oliver Schnarchendorf
On Tue, 6 Jul 2004 13:12:16 +0800, Kelvin Wu wrote: dunno whether this is the right place to post, but i am looking for a solution(for both win32 and linux), something like microsoft passport, one login account can be used cross over domain names. What you are looking for is Single Sign-on.

Re: Single Sign-on Re: Perl Passport?

2004-07-06 Thread Jim Brandt
Agreed that there is no easy answer. Some info on a higher-ed based initiative is here: http://middleware.internet2.edu/webiso/ On Jul 6, 2004, at 12:58 PM, Oliver Schnarchendorf wrote: On Tue, 6 Jul 2004 13:12:16 +0800, Kelvin Wu wrote: dunno whether this is the right place to post, but i am

Re: cvs commit: parrot/ops debug.ops

2004-07-06 Thread Leopold Toetsch
Dan Sugalski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: cvsuser 04/07/06 09:57:07 Modified:ops debug.ops Log: add in a die() op to just flat-out die. Right now. Calls the _exit function, and it doesn't get a whole lot more fatal than that. Couldn't that be wrapped into the Cdie_hard

Re: cvs commit: parrot/ops debug.ops

2004-07-06 Thread Dan Sugalski
At 8:21 PM +0200 7/6/04, Leopold Toetsch wrote: Dan Sugalski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: cvsuser 04/07/06 09:57:07 Modified:ops debug.ops Log: add in a die() op to just flat-out die. Right now. Calls the _exit function, and it doesn't get a whole lot more fatal than that.

fast question

2004-07-06 Thread Matija Papec
Would there be a way to still use simple unquoted hash keys like in old days ($hash{MYKEY})? imho %hashMYKEY at first sight resembles alien ship from Independence day. :)

Re: fast question

2004-07-06 Thread Dan Sugalski
At 8:57 PM +0200 7/6/04, Matija Papec wrote: Would there be a way to still use simple unquoted hash keys like in old days ($hash{MYKEY})? imho %hashMYKEY at first sight resembles alien ship from Independence day. :) You'll need to ask that over on perl6-language. For us, well, it's syntax, and

Re: Single Sign-on Re: Perl Passport?

2004-07-06 Thread Gabor Szabo
On Tue, 6 Jul 2004, Oliver Schnarchendorf wrote: On Tue, 6 Jul 2004 13:12:16 +0800, Kelvin Wu wrote: dunno whether this is the right place to post, but i am looking for a solution(for both win32 and linux), something like microsoft passport, one login account can be used cross over domain

[OT] Re: Single Sign-on Re: Perl Passport?

2004-07-06 Thread Oliver Schnarchendorf
On Tue, 6 Jul 2004 23:44:42 -0200 (GMT+2), Gabor Szabo wrote: If you are looking for a web based solution then I think this is what http://auth.perl.org/ will solve. I am not sure if the code will be available or just the service. As I figured it out neither... Reason: auth.perl.org is part

Re: [OT] Re: Single Sign-on Re: Perl Passport?

2004-07-06 Thread darren chamberlain
* Oliver Schnarchendorf neuroball at usa.net [2004/07/06 14:43]: On Tue, 6 Jul 2004 23:44:42 -0200 (GMT+2), Gabor Szabo wrote: If you are looking for a web based solution then I think this is what http://auth.perl.org/ will solve. I am not sure if the code will be available or just the

[perl #30613] [PATCH] Parrot m4 0.0.7

2004-07-06 Thread via RT
# New Ticket Created by Bernhard Schmalhofer # Please include the string: [perl #30613] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # URL: http://rt.perl.org:80/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=30613 Hi, this is just a minor update of Parrot m4. There are no new

Re: [OT] Re: Single Sign-on Re: Perl Passport?

2004-07-06 Thread Oliver Schnarchendorf
On Tue, 6 Jul 2004 18:04:36 -0400, darren chamberlain wrote: Is that not http://svn.develooper.com/combust/auth/trunk/ ? You need a perl.org account to access it. Thanks darren, this seems to be what Kelvin Wu looked for even though it's not something you just can't through on your

Re: fast question

2004-07-06 Thread Luke Palmer
Matija Papec writes: Would there be a way to still use simple unquoted hash keys like in old days ($hash{MYKEY})? imho %hashMYKEY at first sight resembles alien ship from Independence day. :) Of course there's a way to do it. This is one of those decisions that I was against for the

Predeclaration of subs

2004-07-06 Thread Luke Palmer
Considering that: $obj.meth foo; No longer needs parentheses, and that argument processing is done on the callee rather than the caller side (well, most of the time), do I still have to predeclare Cfoo if I want to say: foo bar, baz; ? Also, how does: method evil($x is rw) Work