Brent 'Dax' Royal-Gordon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
See attached patch, which changes the test to use output_like instead of
output_is. I really wish qr// worked with heredocs...
Thanks, applied. BTW same problem as with b3.py, which compares
compares
leo
Nicholas Clark [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Log:
C ne Perl - add in the missing return to a non-void function.
Great, thanks. I'm currently permanently switching between C, Perl, and
Python. That hurts sometimes.
leo
Hello,
I have a wish for Perl 6. I would like if the open-funktion
opens only a file if it doesn't exist.
Of course, I can first test if the file exist.
if (-e $filename)
{ print file already exists!; }
else
{ open (FH, $filename) }
My suggestion is to have a character for the
On Fri, Jul 09, 2004 at 05:02:48PM +0100, Jonathan Worthington wrote:
Are there plans in Perl 6 for string modifiers?
Not exactly. But method calls can be interpolated into strings, so most
As they are in bash eg.:
${var%glob_or_regexp}
${var%%glob_or_regexp}
my
Hello,
I am missing, in Perl5, some shortcut for matching not whole word,
e.g.:
/^--v(?:e(?:r(?:s(?:i(?:on?)?)?)?)?)?$/
Would there be something in Perl6?
For Perl5 I suggest somenthing like this /--v(?-ersion)$/
Best regards
Hello,
I noticed recently a discusion about *printf*() function.
I wish to be able to specify formating of groups of parameters.
Eg.
printf(Date: %11{%d.%d. %4d}, City: %s\n, $day, $mounth, $year);
Variables $day and $mounth could be one or two digits. There should not
be
my $newfile = $str.subst(rx|\.\w+$|, '')\.bin;
But what about the value of $str after interpolation?
In shall it stays it's original value! I would often need,
to use a little modified value of $str for a particular expression.
I like the way shell does it, to be able to write
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hello,
I have a wish for Perl 6. I would like if the open-funktion
opens only a file if it doesn't exist.
Of course, I can first test if the file exist.
if (-e $filename)
{ print file already exists!; }
else
{ open (FH, $filename) }
My
Luke Palmer writes:
Hans Ginzel writes:
Hello,
I am missing, in Perl5, some shortcut for matching not whole word,
e.g.:
/^--v(?:e(?:r(?:s(?:i(?:on?)?)?)?)?)?$/
Would there be something in Perl6?
Well, I don't think there's an *exact* substitute for that maximally
I apologize in advance for posting yet another suggestion without having
full knowledge of all apocalypses, and I fear (for a very positive
meaning of fear) that the answer will be: but that is already
available.
Well, the point is that I wonder wether Perl6 will support cartesian
products
On Tue, 13 Jul 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a wish for Perl 6. I would like if the open-funktion
opens only a file if it doesn't exist.
Of course, I can first test if the file exist.
I rather have a much bigger wish for an open-like operator that to be
fair I would like to see
On Tue, 13 Jul 2004, Michele Dondi wrote:
I rather have a much bigger wish for an open-like operator that to be
Of course that should be function.
I'm thinking of an operator that returns a magical FH working like the
On Tue, Jul 13, 2004 at 03:41:54PM +0200, Michele Dondi wrote:
On Tue, 13 Jul 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a wish for Perl 6. I would like if the open-funktion
opens only a file if it doesn't exist.
Of course, I can first test if the file exist.
I rather have a much bigger
--- Michele Dondi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I apologize in advance for posting yet another suggestion without
having full knowledge of all apocalypses, and I fear (for a very
positive meaning of fear) that the answer will be: but that is
already available.
Using google(+perl6 +cartesian
On Tue, Jul 13, 2004 at 03:31:57PM +0200, Michele Dondi wrote:
Put more clearly, it is now common to see things like:
for my $x (1..10) {
for my $y (5..20) {
for my $text (qw/foo bar baz/) {
do_stgh_with $x, $y, $text;
}
}
}
and it would be
On Tue, 13 Jul 2004, Jonathan Scott Duff wrote:
I rather have a much bigger wish for an open-like operator that to be
fair I would like to see *also* in Perl5: nothing that one can do in well
more than one way in any case (also including creating a module that will
^
On Tue, 13 Jul 2004, Austin Hastings wrote:
Using google(+perl6 +cartesian product) would have led you to the
conclusion that this is already included. I hope this is horribly
wrong, since the syntax is a little bewildering.
[...]
See Luke Palmer's Outer product considered useful post:
Jonathan Scott Duff writes:
On Tue, Jul 13, 2004 at 03:31:57PM +0200, Michele Dondi wrote:
Put more clearly, it is now common to see things like:
for my $x (1..10) {
for my $y (5..20) {
for my $text (qw/foo bar baz/) {
do_stgh_with $x, $y, $text;
}
--- Michele Dondi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 13 Jul 2004, Austin Hastings wrote:
Using google(+perl6 +cartesian product) would have led you to the
conclusion that this is already included. I hope this is horribly
wrong, since the syntax is a little bewildering.
[...]
See Luke
--- Larry Wall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
While that probably works, I think better style would be to use a
comma:
my $fh = open $filename, :excl;
That explicitly passes :excl to open as a term in a list rather
than relying on the magical properties of :foo to find the preceding
On Tue, Jul 13, 2004 at 10:41:32AM -0700, Austin Hastings wrote:
: --- Larry Wall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
: While that probably works, I think better style would be to use a
: comma:
:
: my $fh = open $filename, :excl;
:
: That explicitly passes :excl to open as a term in a list
Luke Palmer skribis 2004-07-13 7:24 (-0600):
But in Perl 6, you don't have to specify things like that through the
mode string: you can specify them through named parameters:
my $fh = open $filename :excl;
I was hoping we could finally get rid of mode characters, and especially
combined
On Tue, Jul 13, 2004 at 08:04:01PM +0200, Jerome Quelin wrote:
On Monday 12 July 2004 22:40, Nicholas Clark wrote:
osname= darwin
osvers= 7.0
arch= darwin-thread-multi-2level
cc= cc
---
Flags:
[...]
---
Summary of my parrot 0.1.0 configuration:
[...]
---
Environment:
Luke Palmer skribis 2004-07-13 10:28 (-0600):
for outer(1..3, 4..6) - $x, $y {
say $x,$y;
}
1,4
1,5
1,6
2,4
2,5
2,6
3,4
3,5
3,6
So outer is somewhat like {} in shell globs?
perl -le'print for glob {1,2,3},{4,5,6}'
Juerd
On Tue, Jul 13, 2004 at 09:25:52PM +0200, Juerd wrote:
: Luke Palmer skribis 2004-07-13 7:24 (-0600):
: But in Perl 6, you don't have to specify things like that through the
: mode string: you can specify them through named parameters:
: my $fh = open $filename :excl;
:
: I was hoping we
# New Ticket Created by TOGoS
# Please include the string: [perl #30694]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# URL: http://rt.perl.org:80/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=30694
Just a quick little addition to the compiler_faq like
so:
=head2 How am I supposed to
hi!
I did some research on GMP and LGPL, the results are attached. I don't know if
this is a go/nogo for GMP, but it is pretty clear now.
Further the FSF asks for perl6/parrot to use Artistic 2.0, what is the discussion
state on that? (RFC 346)
If somebody else wants to talk to FSF please use
Larry Wall skribis 2004-07-13 14:04 (-0700):
The combined form is definitely problematic in various ways, and we haven't
really redesigned open yet, since we haven't got to A29 yet. :-)
Well, open being much like IO::All::io would really make me happy.
That is:
my $fh = open 'foo.txt';
On Tue, 13 Jul 2004, Larry Wall wrote:
On Tue, Jul 13, 2004 at 07:24:55AM -0600, Luke Palmer wrote:
: But in Perl 6, you don't have to specify things like that through the
: mode string: you can specify them through named parameters:
:
: my $fh = open $filename :excl;
While that
On 7/12/04, Austin Hastings wrote:
--- Larry Wall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The hard part being to pick a random number in [0,Inf) uniformly. :-)
Half of all numbers in [0, Inf) are in the range [Inf/2, Inf). Which
collapses to the range [Inf, Inf). Returning Inf seems to satisfy the
uniform
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Larry Wall) wrote:
On Tue, Jun 29, 2004 at 10:52:34AM -0500, Jonathan Scott Duff wrote:
: :u0 # use bytes (. is byte)
: :u1 # level 1 support (. is codepoint)
: :u2 # level 1 support (. is
David Green writes:
On 7/12/04, Austin Hastings wrote:
--- Larry Wall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The hard part being to pick a random number in [0,Inf) uniformly. :-)
Half of all numbers in [0, Inf) are in the range [Inf/2, Inf). Which
collapses to the range [Inf, Inf). Returning Inf seems
--- Larry Wall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The hard part being to pick a random number in [0,Inf) uniformly. :-)
Half of all numbers in [0, Inf) are in the range [Inf/2, Inf). Which
collapses to the range [Inf, Inf). Returning Inf seems to satisfy the
uniform distribution requirement: if you
33 matches
Mail list logo
