On Sat, 27 Nov 2004 10:28:28 -0800, Larry Wall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Nov 26, 2004 at 02:10:06PM -0800, Larry Wall wrote:
: I know everone has their reflexes tuned to type qw currently, but
: how many of you Gentle Readers would feel blighted if we turned it
: into q:w instead?
Of
Thomas Seiler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dan Sugalski wrote:
At 10:34 AM +0100 11/27/04, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
See also subject Too many opcodes.
[...]
Could you undo this please? Now is not the time to be trimming ops out.
When is the time? After another 1000 opcodes are in, which all
Sam Ruby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I can't seem to combine it with non_prototyped.
.sub foo @ANON, non_prototyped
- Sam Ruby
leo
Luke Palmer wrote:
On a semi-related note, can I get a classoffset without doing a hash
lookup? That is, can I store the class number I get assigned somewhere
for quick fetching?
It *could* be something like the example below. But that doesn't work
yet. Currently subroutines denoted with
Leopold Toetsch [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Piers Cawley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Leopold Toetsch [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
We don't have a problem WRT register preservation, the problem arises
due to register re-using.
Ah! [a light goes on over Piers's head].
Or am I missing something
Leopold Toetsch wrote:
I've checked in intial support for anonymous subroutines.
.sub foo @ANON
creates an anonymous subroutine.
On a semi-related note, can I get a classoffset without doing a hash
lookup? That is, can I store the class number I get assigned somewhere
for quick fetching?
On Sat, 27 Nov 2004 21:49:49 -0500, Michael G Schwern [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Nov 27, 2004 at 09:58:44PM +, Herbert Snorrason wrote:
It should. EcmaScript is also a relatively small language, which would
work strongly in its advantage...
A 188 page language spec is small? ;)
On Sun, Nov 28, 2004 at 01:33:08AM -0500, William Coleda wrote:
3) cd compilers/pge make fails:
c++ -dynamiclib -L/usr/local/lib -flat_namespace -o pge.dylib pge_parse.o
pge_gen.o pge_opt.o pge_parsep5.o pge_parseglob.o
ld: multiple definitions of symbol _pge_cmeta
pge_parse.o
On Sunday 28 November 2004, Jens Rieks wrote:
added new TODO test:
new Px, Ix: argcP is wrong in __init method
minesweeper does not run because of this.
not ok 52 - __init argcP # TODO new Px, Ix: argcP is wrong in __init method
# Failed (TODO) test (t/pmc/objects.t at line 1712)
#
James Mastros wrote:
Larry Wall wrote:
On Fri, Nov 26, 2004 at 07:32:58AM +0300, Alexey Trofimenko wrote:
: ah, I forget, how could I do qx'echo $VAR' in Perl6? something like
: qx:noparse 'echo $VAR' ?
I think we need two more adverbs that add the special features of qx
and qw,
so that you
On Sat, Nov 27, 2004 at 08:21:06PM +0100, Juerd wrote:
James Mastros skribis 2004-11-27 11:36 (+0100):
Much more clear, saves ` for other things
I like the idea. But as a earlier thread showed, people find backticks
ugly. Strangely enough, only when used for something other than
readpipe.
Dan Sugalski wrote:
Absolutely. Compilers do *not* have to be integrated in with parrot --
my current work project uses Parrot as its back end, but the compiler's
written in perl as a standalone program. Works just fine. (Though a
Javascript compiler written in Javascript could bootstrap itself
On Sun, Nov 28, 2004 at 12:24:08PM -0500, John Macdonald wrote:
On Sat, Nov 27, 2004 at 08:21:06PM +0100, Juerd wrote:
James Mastros skribis 2004-11-27 11:36 (+0100):
Much more clear, saves ` for other things
I like the idea. But as a earlier thread showed, people find backticks
ugly.
Leopold Toetsch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Luke Palmer wrote:
The question is, if the sub should already be run, when the subroutine
is parsed. If yes, the example code would run, if the whole parser/lexer
thingy were reentrant.
I've that example running now. Compiling is basically reentrant
On Sun, 28 Nov 2004 12:37:03 +0100, James Mastros [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dan Sugalski wrote:
Absolutely. Compilers do *not* have to be integrated in with parrot -- my
current work project uses Parrot as its back end, but the compiler's
written in perl as a standalone program. Works
Leopold Toetsch wrote:
[...]
Just if you had 32 N regs used before. It's using only one additional
register.
[...]
I did not touch any PMC ops.
You are of course right, maybe I hadn't had enough coffee this morning.
Sorry for the bother, and keep up the good work.
tom (who is going back into
On Sun, 28 Nov 2004 23:03:32 +0100, liorean [EMAIL PROTECTED]
We'll see how I'll do it eventually. Right now I've just begun working
on a lexer and parser. It would be easy to do if I dropped regular
expressions support, but the regular expressions syntax makes the
lexer dependent upon the
On Sun, Nov 28, 2004 at 01:33:08AM -0500, William Coleda wrote:
A few issues with the recent CVS doings...
1) runtime/parrot/library/runtime/PGE.pir doesn't compile by default. Which
it can't, because:
2) PGE doesn't build by default. Should it? If so, then...
Eventually PGE should build
http://www.pobox.com/~schwern/src/Test-Simple-0.52.tar.gz
or
http://mungus.schwern.org/svn/CPAN/Test-Simple/tags/VERSION=0.52
or
svn://mungus.schwern.org/CPAN/Test-Simple/tags/VERSION=0.52
or
a CPAN near you
This is the one bug release. There's one bug left in the RT queue
(everything else is
On Fri, Nov 26, 2004 at 07:32:58AM +0300, Alexey Trofimenko wrote:
I notice that in Perl6 thoose funny « and » could be much more common
than other paired brackets. And some people likes how they look, but
nobody likes fact that there's no (and won't!) be a consistent way to type
them in
Thomas Seiler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Another change that need more thought:
* (is)?g[t,e] N, P variants are *not* redundant
Ops with PMCs aren't changed at all.
,--[ ABI_CHANGES ]-
| The compare and branch opcodes gt, ge, isgt, and isge for I,
21 matches
Mail list logo
