Sam Ruby wrote:
Leopold Toetsch wrote:
A foo PMC could represent an entire row in a two dimensional MMD, or
an entire plane in a three dimensional MMD, ... etc.
What does it mean: represent a row...? What about the namespace
pollution? Again: where does this hypothetical MMD PMC come from?
A
Leopold Toetsch wrote:
Sam Ruby wrote:
Leopold Toetsch wrote:
A foo PMC could represent an entire row in a two dimensional MMD, or
an entire plane in a three dimensional MMD, ... etc.
What does it mean: represent a row...? What about the namespace
pollution? Again: where does this hypothetical
Sam Ruby wrote:
First, a direct quote from
http://www.perl.com/pub/a/2004/04/16/a12.html?page=10:
Please let's stay at the basics. Please describe your counter proposal
for a very elementary
add Px, Py, Pz
operation.
There's really no need to procede to Perl6 objects, if we can't even
find a
Leopold Toetsch wrote:
Sam Ruby wrote:
First, a direct quote from
http://www.perl.com/pub/a/2004/04/16/a12.html?page=10:
Please let's stay at the basics. Please describe your counter proposal
for a very elementary
add Px, Py, Pz
operation.
There's really no need to procede to Perl6 objects,
On Fri, 2004-12-17 at 16:40 -0800, chromatic wrote:
# New Ticket Created by chromatic
# Please include the string: [perl #33094]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# URL: http://rt.perl.org:80/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=33094
Here's a patch to clean up
Sam Ruby wrote:
First, a few things to note: the semantics of add vary from language
to language. In particular, add is not guaranteed to be commutative in
Python (think string addition).
Yes, of course.
As my proposal is primarily focused on where the logic is placed in the
system, not how it
On Dec 20, 2004, at 6:44 PM, David Wheeler wrote:
PS Somebody should drag autrijus into this.
I'll try to grab him on IRC in the morning...
I got him this morning. Here's the discussion:
09:50am] Theory: seen autrijus
[09:50am] purl: autrijus was last seen on #p5p 1 hour and 32 minutes
ago,
On Wed, Dec 22, 2004 at 10:26:02AM -0800, David Wheeler wrote:
1. Perl gets smarter about duping file handles, so that the dupes get
the same i/o layer settings as the handles they dupe.
Changing this going forwards doesn't change any of the installed perls out
there in the wild. So whatever
--- Nicholas Clark [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Dec 22, 2004 at 10:26:02AM -0800, David Wheeler wrote:
1. Perl gets smarter about duping file handles, so that the dupes
get
the same i/o layer settings as the handles they dupe.
Changing this going forwards doesn't change any of the
On Wed, Dec 22, 2004 at 11:41:56AM -0800, Ovid wrote:
--- Nicholas Clark [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Dec 22, 2004 at 10:26:02AM -0800, David Wheeler wrote:
1. Perl gets smarter about duping file handles, so that the dupes
get
the same i/o layer settings as the handles they dupe.
OK, everyone send Mr. Cowgilll a polite message letting him know that,
in the future, he needs to not send these messages to mailing lists.
He'll feel really bad about his poor etiquette and we can say only
Cowgills get the blues.
Ooh, that was awful, awful, awful. Never let me near a pun
Mr. Cowgill's computer did not send such a message to the list. (It's
not in the archive.) He sent it to you directly.
-R
At Wed, 22 Dec 2004 12:27:51 -0800 (PST),
Ovid wrote:
OK, everyone send Mr. Cowgilll a polite message letting him know that,
in the future, he needs to not send these
Hi, a lurker here.
Probably you forgot the braces:
+ /* let's ignore the complexities of a distance_func for now... */
+ mmd_flag = 0;
+ addsub = VTABLE_find_method(INTERP, $1, __add, 0, mdd_flag);
+ if (!addsub)
{
+ mmd_flag = 0;
+ addsub =
Luke Palmer writes:
Also, don't use rule parameters, conditionals, or code blocks. Those
things require us to know Perl 6 before we're done defining Perl 6.
Keep it essentially BNF with Perl 6 syntax (it's okay to use groups and
quantifiers though, since those can always be converted to
Robert Spier wrote:
Mr. Cowgill's computer did not send such a message to the list. (It's
not in the archive.) He sent it to you directly.
This is (almost always) Microsoft Exchange BS. I used to monitor some of
the ActiveState mailing lists, try to answer questions and help people.
But every
Randy W. Sims wrote:
This is (almost always) Microsoft Exchange BS.
On one list I manage on Topica, this is a fairly frequent problem. I'm
convinced that part of the problem is that Topica doesn't set a
Precedence: bulk header.
Sometimes the messages go only as a reply to the poster, but
16 matches
Mail list logo
