Re: UNIX commands: chmod

2006-03-26 Thread Jonathan Lang
Mark Overmeer wrote: > * Larry Wall ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060327 01:07]: > > On Sun, Mar 26, 2006 at 02:40:03PM -0800, Larry Wall wrote: > > : On the original question, I see it more as a junctional issue. > > : Assuming we have only chmod($,$), this sould autothread: > > : > > : unless chmod MO

Re: UNIX commands: chmod

2006-03-26 Thread Mark Overmeer
* Larry Wall ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060327 01:07]: > On Sun, Mar 26, 2006 at 02:40:03PM -0800, Larry Wall wrote: > : On the original question, I see it more as a junctional issue. > : Assuming we have only chmod($,$), this sould autothread: > : > : unless chmod MODE, all(@files) -> $oops { > :

Re: libparrot.so.0.4.2

2006-03-26 Thread Nick Glencross
On 26/03/06, Sean Sieger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 3/25/06, Nick Glencross <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Is it possible that a 'make install' has previously been done on this > > computer, so that there is a libparrot in /usr/local/lib? > > Yep; compiling now. Great. The problem is caused

Re: UNIX commands: chmod

2006-03-26 Thread Larry Wall
On Sun, Mar 26, 2006 at 02:40:03PM -0800, Larry Wall wrote: : On the original question, I see it more as a junctional issue. : Assuming we have only chmod($,$), this sould autothread: : : unless chmod MODE, all(@files) -> $oops { : ???; : profit(); : } Except that junctional l

Re: UNIX commands: chmod

2006-03-26 Thread Larry Wall
On Sat, Mar 25, 2006 at 01:22:18PM +0200, Gabor Szabo wrote: : On 3/25/06, Nicholas Clark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: : > On Sat, Mar 25, 2006 at 12:58:30PM +0200, Gabor Szabo wrote: : > > 4) "filename".chmod(MODE) should also work and I guess : > > .chmod(MODE) should also work on those 3 file

Re: UNIX commands: chmod

2006-03-26 Thread Mark Overmeer
* Gabor Szabo ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060326 19:26]: > On 3/26/06, Mark Overmeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > LIST = chmod MODE, LIST > > > > My feeling is that this function design is a bit of a mistake. Usually, > > one perl function maps on one operating-system function, but in this case > > i

Re: UNIX commands: chmod

2006-03-26 Thread Gabor Szabo
On 3/26/06, Mark Overmeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > LIST = chmod MODE, LIST > > My feeling is that this function design is a bit of a mistake. Usually, > one perl function maps on one operating-system function, but in this case > it doesn't: it simulated the common chmod(1) user command. [..

Re: UNIX commands: chmod

2006-03-26 Thread Mark Overmeer
* Gabor Szabo ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060325 09:58]: > So we had chmod in Perl5, I would like to make sure it works in > Perl6 as well with slight modifications. > > LIST = chmod MODE, LIST My feeling is that this function design is a bit of a mistake. Usually, one perl function maps on one operati

Re: [perl #38800] Strange dump output from PGE (x86_64 related?)

2006-03-26 Thread Patrick R. Michaud
On Sun, Mar 26, 2006 at 03:10:31PM +0200, Leopold Toetsch wrote: > > On Mar 25, 2006, at 5:11, Patrick R.Michaud (via RT) wrote: > > >I'm running a fresh checkout of r12014. I wrote a simple test > >program (t.pir attached) that uses "dumper.pir" to dump the > >contents of one of PGE's internal

Re: [perl #38800] Strange dump output from PGE (x86_64 related?)

2006-03-26 Thread Leopold Toetsch
On Mar 25, 2006, at 5:11, Patrick R.Michaud (via RT) wrote: .sub main load_bytecode "PGE.pbc" load_bytecode "dumper.pir" load_bytecode "PGE/Dumper.pir" $P0 = find_global "PGE::P6Rule", "$optable" "_dumper"($P0) .end Another note, I forgot to mention: above code doesn't w

Re: [perl #38800] Strange dump output from PGE (x86_64 related?)

2006-03-26 Thread Leopold Toetsch
On Mar 25, 2006, at 5:11, Patrick R.Michaud (via RT) wrote: I'm running a fresh checkout of r12014. I wrote a simple test program (t.pir attached) that uses "dumper.pir" to dump the contents of one of PGE's internal variables. On my 64-bit environment (SUSE 10 Professional Linux) I get very s