James Keenan via RT wrote:
On Sun Jul 08 12:27:06 2007, jkeen at verizon.net wrote:
t/examples/shootout.t is failing even worse today than yesterday.
Here's the weekly update: shootout continues to fail on Darwin ... but
it's continuing to pass on Linux (which I've upgraded to Debian 4.0).
Since my complaint was about 'make', not 'make test' as well, I am
closing the ticket.
Mark Glines wrote:
# New Ticket Created by Mark Glines
# Please include the string: [perl #44809]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=44809 >
[snip]
Are there any drawbacks to this patch? The only thing I
can t
On Tuesday 21 August 2007 05:16:30 François PERRAD wrote:
> NEWS / languages / Lua :
> Lua works now with a PGE/TGE/PAST-pm based compiler, lives in one pbc,
> and the interpreter has same behavior than the original (options, prompt,
> environment variables, ...).
>
> But all is broken since r2075
On Tue, Aug 21, 2007 at 11:42:00AM -0400, Andy Dougherty wrote:
> On Mon, 20 Aug 2007, Patrick R. Michaud wrote:
>
> > In preparation for the upcoming Parrot release,
> > please send or commit any updates to NEWS, PLATFORMS,
> > or other files that describe improvements or other
> > important ch
On Tue, 21 Aug 2007 13:08:05 +0200
Ron Blaschke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The win32 skippage will need to be removed again, once the PMCNULL
> > symbol is exported correctly from libparrot.dll.
>
> Not adding the skip on the other t/src tests will cause them to
> fail. I think it would be b
On Tue, 21 Aug 2007 09:52:01 -0700
chromatic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> return unless -f $filename;
> return retrieve($filename);
>
> My preference is the latter, for clarity and context reasons.
Thanks, you're absolutely right. Here's an updated patch.
Mark
Index: lib/Parrot/Pmc
On Monday 20 August 2007 16:49:53 Mark Glines wrote:
> With this patch, parrot rebuilds for me in 1 minute 41 seconds, plus or
> minus a few seconds. That's almost 80 seconds faster; a 45% improvement
> in build time.
>
> For reference, I also tried YAML::Syck, which built in 1 minute 55
> seconds
Y-- Y Y Y? ?
20070309
-sol8-sparc-ccB--- - - -Y/441 ?
20070427
+sol8-sparc-ccB--- - - - Y/409 ?
20070821
sol10-sparc-cc_5.8 BY-- Y Y YY/9 ?
200
On Mon Aug 20 16:49:53 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> With ccache, HEAD rebuilds for me in a little less than 3 minutes.
> (2:57, on average.)
>
> With this patch, parrot rebuilds for me in 1 minute 41 seconds, plus or
> minus a few seconds. That's almost 80 seconds faster; a 45% improvement
> i
James Keenan wrote:
# New Ticket Created by James Keenan
# Please include the string: [perl #44645]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=44645 >
WHAT DOES THE ATTACHED PATCH DO?
1. It refactors Parrot::Configu
At 20:12 20/08/2007 -0500, Patrick R. Michaud wrote:
In preparation for the upcoming Parrot release,
please send or commit any updates to NEWS, PLATFORMS,
or other files that describe improvements or other
important changes since the 0.4.14 release.
NEWS / languages / Lua :
Lua works now with a
Hi Mark,
Mark Glines wrote:
> On Mon, 20 Aug 2007 18:37:05 -0700
> Mark Glines <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Jerry added a workaround in r20641, declaring a local variable
>> PMCNULL within the test code, to get it to pass. Unfortunately, this
>> workaround causes Darwin to fail with the message
# New Ticket Created by Mark Glines
# Please include the string: [perl #44809]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=44809 >
With ccache, HEAD rebuilds for me in a little less than 3 minutes.
(2:57, on average.)
W
On 21/08/07, Patrick R. Michaud <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 20, 2007 at 05:26:22PM -0400, Andy Dougherty wrote:
> > > I can't think of a clean, portable, efficient way to test that a floating
> > > point variable is zero other than == 0.0;
> >
> > Nor can I. Thus you either use lots o
15 matches
Mail list logo
