On Saturday 12 July 2008 21:52:52 Christoph Otto via RT wrote:
> The test now passes, although I'll leave this ticket open until someone
> can confirm that it still does the right thing.
>
> The new version of t/codingstd/c_macro_args.t as of r29372 has several
> special cases: stringification, co
On Fri Jul 11 09:41:21 2008, julianalbo wrote:
>
> There is a problem with the autogenerated name: in several cases there
> are other things with that name. For example, for the float.pmc we
> have the Parrot_Float type defined in include/parrot/config.h
>
> Given that the name will be mainly use
From: Bob Rogers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 9 Jul 2008 01:27:29 -0400
Oops; r28763 seems to be the source of one of my problems, a "lexical
not found" error. With this change, Parrot gets confused when multiple
calls to the :outer sub have been made, such as when it is recursiv
On Sat, Jul 12, 2008 at 11:00:29AM -0700, James Keenan via RT wrote:
> On Sat Jul 12 09:33:35 2008, coke wrote:
> >
> > Another solution here would be to not run them by default. The purpose
> > of 'make test'
> > should be to verify that the parrot functionality works on the target
> > system.
>
On Sunday 13 July 2008 15:27:10 Bob Rogers wrote:
> I'm open to suggestions.
>
>(I'm not sure it needs to be a separate file.)
>
> At the time, I was thinking that having a separate file for longer cases
> was a good idea. But "prove t/op/lexicals.t" takes only 4s on my
> machine, so I guess
From: Bob Rogers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, 13 Jul 2008 18:34:32 -0400
I must have messed up; for some reason, I thought this was on
chromatic's hit list. Fixed in revision 29408.
Er, I mean 29409.
-- Bob
From: chromatic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, 13 Jul 2008 00:39:38 -0700
On Saturday 12 July 2008 14:01:17 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Added:
>trunk/t/op/lexicals-2.t (contents, props changed)
> Modified:
>trunk/MANIFEST
>
> Log:
> * t/op/lexicals-2.t (adde
Two of the three directories were left over from earlier development of
testing of configuration steps, so I was familiar with them. The third
had apparently last been used > 20K revisions ago, in the long distant
past of 2005.
3 directories removed. Ticket marked resolved.
kid51
# New Ticket Created by Moritz Lenz
# Please include the string: [perl #56900]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=56900 >
I read ROADMAP again the other day, and thought about topics that we
could offer new hack
Hi,
I'm reviewing the tests in S09, and the file
t/spec/S02-builtin_data_types/multi_dimensional_array.t uses the [0][0]
indexing format interchangeably with [0;0].
These two formats mean two different things, correct? The [0][0] form isn't
mentioned much in the spec, nor is [0;0] or if they
Will Coleda (via RT) schrieb:
# New Ticket Created by Will Coleda
# Please include the string: [perl #56894]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=56894 >
The P::C author recommends we ditch the syntax 'use 5.008
This problem is fixed by other similar problem whose ticket was not
linked to this. r29358 unskip the test.
Closing ticket.
# New Ticket Created by Will Coleda
# Please include the string: [perl #56896]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=56896 >
The following directories are empty in the svn repo. We should remove
them and verify tha
On Sun, Jul 13, 2008 at 12:56 PM, chromatic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sunday 13 July 2008 09:33:31 Will Coleda wrote:
>
>> Working on this, I see that we have a ^L before the coda in quite a
>> few files in, e.g.: tools/build/; This isn't Tidy.
>>
>> ISTR this was done purposefully. Anyone r
# New Ticket Created by Will Coleda
# Please include the string: [perl #56894]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=56894 >
If you upgrade to Perl::Critic 1.088, you'll start seeing the
following warnings on this
So you're suggesting that
A op* n
should map to
[op] A xx n
?
--
Jonathan "Dataweaver" Lang
On Sunday 13 July 2008 09:33:31 Will Coleda wrote:
> Working on this, I see that we have a ^L before the coda in quite a
> few files in, e.g.: tools/build/; This isn't Tidy.
>
> ISTR this was done purposefully. Anyone remember why?
Emacs needs its read-only marking in the final logical page of t
# New Ticket Created by Will Coleda
# Please include the string: [perl #56892]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=56892 >
Working on this, I see that we have a ^L before the coda in quite a
few files in, e.g.:
On Thu Feb 21 13:52:31 2008, coke wrote:
> On Fri Nov 02 07:56:44 2007, particle wrote:
> > as per PDD07 (r22655,) c macro args *must* be wrapped in parens inside
> > macro bodies, to allow expressions passed as macro parameters.
> >
> > for example, i expect:
> > #define CLASS_has_alien_parents_
2008/7/12 Bob Rogers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> 9 days and no complaints; done.
>
When the coda is added by the generator, that's fine.
But MANIFEST is generated (with MANIFEST.SKIP)
and MANIFEST.generated is not a generated file (but the file that contains
all the generated/built files that could
On Mie. Mar. 14 11:46:38 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I keep getting a test failure on t/op/stringu.t with test 25 on
> ppc-darwin(and likely all big endian systems with icu installed).
> Parrot outputs "\x00A\x00B" when the test expects "A\x00B\x00" to be
> printed.
Is this still a proble
HaloO,
I know that the hot phase of the operator discussions are over.
But here's a little orthogonalizing idea from my side. The observation
is that * can be regarded as repeated addition: 5 * 3 == 5 + 5 + 5
and ** as repeated multiplication. Now imagine having a meta_postfix:<*>
that gives +* as
On Saturday 12 July 2008 14:01:17 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Added:
>trunk/t/op/lexicals-2.t (contents, props changed)
> Modified:
>trunk/MANIFEST
>
> Log:
> * t/op/lexicals-2.t (added), MANIFEST:
>+ Add three more lexical tests, pursuant to RT#56398. The second is
> "todo", wi
23 matches
Mail list logo
