On Mon, Mar 02, 2009 at 08:33:16AM -0800, Carl Mäsak wrote:
> rakudo: rule w { . }; 'a' ~~ m//; for %($/).kv {}
> rakudo 50279c: RESULT«Method 'HOW' not found for invocant of
> class 'Iterator' [...]
While I agree that the error message is likely incorrect -- I'm not
sure what the intent of the
Patrick R. Michaud wrote:
This is also related to RT #62948, where null values appear in arrays and other
aggregates. Instead of adding a bunch of "is this value null" checks
throughout the code, I'd prefer to look for a way to automatically promote nulls into
undefs at the appropriate points
Patrick R. Michaud wrote:
Is it feasible to catch all "Null PMC access" exceptions at the
top-level, promote PMCNULL to Undef (or Failure) and resume from
exception?
Good thinking... but there's not anything to "promote" -- i.e., from an
exception handler we wouldn't have the ability to change
# New Ticket Created by "Carl Mäsak"
# Please include the string: [perl #63606]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=63606 >
rakudo: rule w { . }; 'a' ~~ m//; for %($/).kv {}
rakudo 50279c: RESULT«Method 'HOW' n
On Tue, Mar 03, 2009 at 11:01:22AM +1100, Vasily Chekalkin wrote:
> Patrick R. Michaud wrote:
>>> Is it feasible to catch all "Null PMC access" exceptions at the
>>> top-level, promote PMCNULL to Undef (or Failure) and resume from
>>> exception?
>>
>> Good thinking... but there's not anything to "p
On Tue, Mar 03, 2009 at 10:21:33AM +1100, Vasily Chekalkin wrote:
> Patrick R. Michaud wrote:
>> This is also related to RT #62948, where null values appear in arrays and
>> other aggregates. Instead of adding a bunch of "is this value null" checks
>> throughout the code, I'd prefer to look for
On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 02:21:59AM -0800, Vasily Chekalkin via RT wrote:
> On Wed Feb 25 00:49:42 2009, ml...@physik.uni-wuerzburg.de wrote:
> > 09:45 <@moritz_> rakudo: sub m (&f) { say "a" ~~ m// }; regex outer {
> > a };
> > m(&a)
> > 09:45 < p6eval> rakudo 7f8ba6: OUTPUT«Null P
On Sat, Feb 28, 2009 at 04:56:55PM -0600, Chris Dolan wrote:
> On Feb 28, 2009, at 11:07 AM, Patrick R. Michaud wrote:
>> On Sat, Feb 28, 2009 at 10:46:10AM -0600, Andy Lester wrote:
>>> On Feb 28, 2009, at 10:29 AM, Patrick R. Michaud wrote:
So, for the time being Rakudo's official policy wil
On Sun, Mar 01, 2009 at 11:06:53AM -0600, Andy Lester wrote:
> So how about this for the workflow, Patrick:
>
> 1) Developer creates a branch to work on a feature or cleanup or
> whatever
> 2) Developer commits to dev/rakudo work branch however much she wants.
> 3) Developer merges back to dev/ra
On Sun, Mar 01, 2009 at 03:32:46PM -0600, Chris Dolan wrote:
> On Feb 26, 2009, at 3:06 PM, Moritz Lenz wrote:
>
>> But after that please do a 'make clean; perl Configure.pl' to make
>> sure
>> that the fallout of the previous build don't affect the new one.
>
> Time to update tools/rebase-rakudo
On Sun, Mar 01, 2009 at 10:38:01AM -0800, Patrick R. Michaud via RT wrote:
> Patch applied in 023bb60, thanks!
I should also note that Test::Harness 3 actually uses TAP::Harness,
and that Test::Harness becomes a somewhat backwards-compatible interface
for TAP::Harness.
Pm
S04 mentions that statement modifiers behave as for perl5 (excpet that
you can have both an conditional modifier and a looping modifier on a
single statement.
Both then it gives this example, with be modifiers being operators
within an expression, not as modifiers of a statement.
line 260:
2009/3/2 Moritz Lenz :
> Thomas Chust wrote:
>> [...]
>> Therefore I think that it would be a nice addition for Perl 6 if the
>> X...X, <<...>> and similar operators could be applied to anonymous
>> subroutines in addition to other operators. If such a syntactic change
>> wasn't possible it would p
On 2009 Mar 2, at 6:19, Timothy S. Nelson wrote:
On Mon, 2 Mar 2009, Chris Dolan wrote:
On Mar 2, 2009, at 12:04 AM, Timothy S. Nelson wrote:
Hi. I note that we have $?OS, $?VM, and $?DISTRO (and their $*
counterparts). I'd like to recommend that we eliminate $?OS, and
replace it with $?K
# New Ticket Created by Moritz Lenz
# Please include the string: [perl #63594]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=63594 >
It seems that even the simplest programs leak memory:
$ perl6 -e 'while 1 { }'
Watching
Hi,
Thomas Chust wrote:
> Hello,
>
> looking into Perl 6 syntax I noticed that there are meta- and
> hyperoperators to perform among others the classical functional map
> and fold operations. However, if I understood this correctly, you can
> only use these constructs to lift scalar *operators* t
On Mon, 2 Mar 2009, Daniel Ruoso wrote:
Em Seg, 2009-03-02 às 23:47 +1100, Timothy S. Nelson escreveu:
On Mon, 2 Mar 2009, Daniel Ruoso wrote:
So, I think the proper name to the variables would be
$?ARCH and $*ARCH
Where they would stringify to the arch triplet, while providing
convenience me
Hi,
I've pushed the branch match_perl to github which implements Match.perl.
What it emits is valid Perl 6 (I hope), but since Match.new() doesn't
seem to work with named parameters yet, the result can not be evaluated
back to match object.
The output is extremely useful for debugging, IMHO:
$ .
# New Ticket Created by Moritz Lenz
# Please include the string: [perl #63590]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=63590 >
Rakudo 08b789048:
./perl6 -e 'class A { submethod BUILD(*...@a) { say @a.perl } }; A.new
Hello Hinrik,
I will be the organization admin for TPF in GSoC 2009, please read
more about it here:
http://leto.net/dukeleto.pl/2009/03/applying-to-google-summer-of-c.html
If you are a Perl-related project that wants to mentor a student in
GSoC, please contact me directly.
Cheers,
# New Ticket Created by Moritz Lenz
# Please include the string: [perl #63596]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=63596 >
# file next-bug.pl
use v6;
sub s($i is copy) {
my @array;
for 1..3 {
@arr
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
The bug seems to be due to two different Perl versions installed on the
mac (one in /usr/bin, the other one in /opt/local/bin).
After changing the PATH so that the version in /usr/bin was used
exclusively, the build process terminated without any erro
# New Ticket Created by Moritz Lenz
# Please include the string: [perl #63592]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=63592 >
Rakudo 08b789048:
$ time perl6 -e 'while 1 { 0.substr(-10) }'
Segmentation fault
real
# New Ticket Created by Moritz Lenz
# Please include the string: [perl #63588]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=63588 >
Rakudo 08b789048:
./perl6 -e 'our $x; class Foo { $x = 3 }; say $x'
Null PMC access in g
Hi,
Hinrik Örn Sigurðsson wrote:
> Google has announced this year's Summer of Code[1]. The Perl
> Foundation accepted one project (mentored by Moritz) related to Perl 6
> last year[2]. I was wondering if there are any developers interested
> in mentoring students on Perl 6-related projects this ye
# New Ticket Created by Christian Kirsch
# Please include the string: [perl #63584]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=63584 >
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
I'm trying to build rakudo/parro
Parrot Bug Summary
http://rt.perl.org/rt3/NoAuth/parrot/Overview.html
Generated at Mon Mar 2 14:00:03 2009 GMT
---
* Numbers
* New Issues
* Overview of Open Issues
* Ticket Status By Version
* Requestors with mo
Em Seg, 2009-03-02 às 10:39 -0300, Daniel Ruoso escreveu:
> Em Seg, 2009-03-02 às 23:47 +1100, Timothy S. Nelson escreveu:
> > Are we talking about $?VM vs. $?XVM here?
> Well, yes... that adresses $?HOST_PERL and $?TARGET_PERL... but still
> leaves $?HOST_ARCH and $?TARGET_ARCH, assuming not a
Em Seg, 2009-03-02 às 23:47 +1100, Timothy S. Nelson escreveu:
> On Mon, 2 Mar 2009, Daniel Ruoso wrote:
> > So, I think the proper name to the variables would be
> > $?ARCH and $*ARCH
> > Where they would stringify to the arch triplet, while providing
> > convenience methods for .cpu, .platform a
On Mon, 2 Mar 2009, Daniel Ruoso wrote:
Em Seg, 2009-03-02 às 17:04 +1100, Timothy S. Nelson escreveu:
Hi. I note that we have $?OS, $?VM, and $?DISTRO (and their $*
counterparts). I'd like to recommend that we eliminate $?OS, and replace it
with $?KERNEL (ie. Linux) and maybe $?ARCH
Em Seg, 2009-03-02 às 17:04 +1100, Timothy S. Nelson escreveu:
> Hi. I note that we have $?OS, $?VM, and $?DISTRO (and their $*
> counterparts). I'd like to recommend that we eliminate $?OS, and replace it
> with $?KERNEL (ie. Linux) and maybe $?ARCH (ie. i386). Thoughts?
The usual way
On Mon, 2 Mar 2009, Chris Dolan wrote:
On Mar 2, 2009, at 12:04 AM, Timothy S. Nelson wrote:
Hi. I note that we have $?OS, $?VM, and $?DISTRO (and their $*
counterparts). I'd like to recommend that we eliminate $?OS, and replace
it with $?KERNEL (ie. Linux) and maybe $?ARCH (ie. i386). Th
Author: leto
Date: 2009-03-02 11:09:04 +0100 (Mon, 02 Mar 2009)
New Revision: 25654
Modified:
docs/Perl6/Spec/S32-setting-library/Numeric.pod
Log:
Fix typo in Numeric
Modified: docs/Perl6/Spec/S32-setting-library/Numeric.pod
===
-
Hej Lars,
Lars (>):
> I do not know Perl at all, but I'm very interested in perl6.
> My problem is I do not find a good tutorial how to do real perl6
> development, all I find seems to assume you know perl5 and the perl
> community. And I do not.
That's an interesting question! I guess most of th
On Mar 2, 2009, at 12:04 AM, Timothy S. Nelson wrote:
Hi. I note that we have $?OS, $?VM, and $?DISTRO (and their $*
counterparts). I'd like to recommend that we eliminate $?OS, and
replace it with $?KERNEL (ie. Linux) and maybe $?ARCH (ie. i386).
Thoughts?
I disagree.
User-space cod
Hi,
I do not know Perl at all, but I'm very interested in perl6.
My problem is I do not find a good tutorial how to do real perl6
development, all I find seems to assume you know perl5 and the perl
community. And I do not.
As an example I like to build a routine that connects to SAP and fetch dat
Hello,
looking into Perl 6 syntax I noticed that there are meta- and
hyperoperators to perform among others the classical functional map
and fold operations. However, if I understood this correctly, you can
only use these constructs to lift scalar *operators* to the domain of
arrays.
Coming from
Also .signature on multis:
rakudo: sub f($z) {}; &f.signature.perl.say
rakudo af4b73: OUTPUT«:(Any $z)»
rakudo: multi sub f($z) {}; &f.signature.perl.say
rakudo af4b73: OUTPUT«Null PMC access in find_method() [...]
# New Ticket Created by "Carl Mäsak"
# Please include the string: [perl #63570]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=63570 >
rakudo: sub f($z) {}; &f.signature.params
rakudo af4b73: RESULT«Null PMC access in fin
# New Ticket Created by "Carl Mäsak"
# Please include the string: [perl #63568]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=63568 >
oh and is arity defined on multi subs ?
rakudo: sub f($z) {}; &f.arity.say
rakudo af4
40 matches
Mail list logo
