Hi Folks,
This is the first time I have tried to compile parrot and perl6.
I have tried various combinations of perl6 and parrot snapshots
but all perl6 builds fail (at different places). Can anyone help
me get a clean build?
For example getting the latest parrot from svn truck and perl6
from
Hi,
neil.mowb...@calgacus.com wrote:
Hi Folks,
This is the first time I have tried to compile parrot and perl6.
I have tried various combinations of perl6 and parrot snapshots
but all perl6 builds fail (at different places). Can anyone help
me get a clean build?
For example getting the
Yes I tried the --gen-parrot and it had a similar problem.
For the below, I did a clean svn checkout of parrot and
git clone. For parrot I did
$ perl Configure.pl
$ make
$ make fulltest
$ make install
$ make install-dev
However that didn't copy cygparrot.dll to /usr/local/bin
and the
Austin ():
I've been doing a bunch of NQP and PIR coding, where Pmichaud++ has been
trying to support some kind of POD syntax. With the release of the S26
draft, he has tightened the parsing to follow more of the rules laid out in
the spec, and after a few months, I've noticed that the trend
Personally, I've always thought that Perl has a very natural feel to
it, and deserves a doc markup format that's also natural: [Markdown]
(and [Pandoc]'s Markdown has just the right additions, IMO).
[Markdown]: http://daringfireball.net/projects/markdown/
[Pandoc]:
* John Gabriele (jmg3...@gmail.com) [100209 14:31]:
[Markdown]: http://daringfireball.net/projects/markdown/
[Pandoc]: http://johnmacfarlane.net/pandoc/
[reST]: http://docutils.sourceforge.net/rst.html
Or, more Perl like:
[OODoc] http://perl.overmeer.net/oodoc/
Using a clean git clone I went back and tried
perl Configure.pl --gen-parrot which failed in a new way:
/work/solon/neilmowbray/tool/foo/rakudo/parrot_install/src/2.0.0-devel/pmc/s
ub.dump
/work/solon/neilmowbray/tool/foo/rakudo/parrot_install/src/2.0.0-devel/pmc/u
Hi Neil,
there exists already packages in cygwin for rakudo and parrot. Reini
Urban put them in. I don't not know about the current version number.
But rakudo and parrot should build out of the box under Windows.
You don't need cygwin.
The last time I build Rakudo under Windows I installed:
On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 8:50 AM, Mark Overmeer m...@overmeer.net wrote:
* John Gabriele (jmg3...@gmail.com) [100209 14:31]:
[Markdown]: http://daringfireball.net/projects/markdown/
[Pandoc]: http://johnmacfarlane.net/pandoc/
[reST]: http://docutils.sourceforge.net/rst.html
Or, more Perl
On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 9:31 AM, John Gabriele jmg3...@gmail.com wrote:
Personally, I've always thought that Perl has a very natural feel to
{snip}
Gah. Sorry for the quasi-double-post. I posted on google groups, it
didn't show up, then I jumped the gun and posted a similar message to
the ML.
On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 11:00 AM, neil.mowb...@calgacus.com wrote:
Alas I need a cygwin build.
The cygwin parrot package is quite old at 0.8.1.
I'm surprised to have such difficulty building under cygwin.
It seems that parrot $ make install-dev isn't installing the
Please note that
No, to scrapped all the old versions off (several times ...).
-Original Message-
From: Will Coleda [mailto:w...@coleda.com]
Sent: 11 February 2010 00:15
To: neil.mowb...@calgacus.com
Cc: Gerd Pokorra; perl6-compi...@perl.org
Subject: Re: New user trying to compiler perl6 without success
Author: lwall
Date: 2010-02-10 18:10:26 +0100 (Wed, 10 Feb 2010)
New Revision: 29675
Modified:
docs/Perl6/Spec/S03-operators.pod
docs/Perl6/Spec/S09-data.pod
docs/Perl6/Spec/S32-setting-library/Containers.pod
Log:
[Spec] squash [;] fossils noticed by eternaleye++
Modified:
John Gabriele wrote:
Personally, I've always thought that Perl has a very natural feel to
it, and deserves a doc markup format that's also natural: [Markdown]
(and [Pandoc]'s Markdown has just the right additions, IMO).
[Markdown]: http://daringfireball.net/projects/markdown/
[Pandoc]:
Carl observed:
Partly that is because documentation isn't at the forefront of things
that need to be implemented for Perl 6 to be useful, so it's kind of
lagging behind the rest.
Partly it's because Damian is the owner of that synopsis, and he
practices a kind of drive-by-updating to it. As
On Fri, Feb 05, 2010 at 03:43:04PM -0500, Austin Hastings wrote:
Second, POD is not XML, and it definitely isn't DOCBOOK. Why do I
need magic reserved words like TOC and APPENDIX? I'm not writing a
book, I'm writing code. And if I was writing a book, I wouldn't be
dumb enough to write it in
16 matches
Mail list logo
