On Sun, Jun 06, 2010 at 11:06:07PM +0200, Cosimo Streppone wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Just for fun, I'm trying to write a Digest::MD5 module for Rakudo.
> Right now I'm stuck with something like:
>
> sub test (Str $text) {
> Q:PIR {
> load_bytecode 'Digest/MD5.pbc'
> $P0 = f
Now fixed in 841262f. Assigning to moritz++ for test verification to
close ticket.
Pm
Hi all,
Just for fun, I'm trying to write a Digest::MD5 module for Rakudo.
Right now I'm stuck with something like:
sub test (Str $text) {
Q:PIR {
load_bytecode 'Digest/MD5.pbc'
$P0 = find_lex '$text'
$P1 = _md5sum($P0)
$S0 = _md5_hex($P1)
Now fixed in 06723b4... assigning to moritz++ for test verification and
unfudging.
Pm
On Sat May 01 09:30:15 2010, masak wrote:
> rakudo: class A { has $.a; has $.b };
A.^attributes>>.name.perl.say
> rakudo c4857a: OUTPUT«("\$!a", "\$!b", "\$!a", "\$!b",
> "\$!a", "\$!b")»
> finanalyst: that works.
> "works"
> :)
> have you actually looked at the output?
> it's... interestin
This is an automatically generated mail to inform you that tests are now
available in t/spec/S12-class/basic.t
commit 435e1ba16db479c8904ff5d831cabdeb5a20ab79
Author: radus
Date: Sun Jun 6 12:44:13 2010 +
[t/spec] Added tests for RT 65022 - Nested classes declared inside
different cl
On Sun May 30 05:44:14 2010, masak wrote:
> I've found a case where a line number is one-off. should I
> nopaste it?
> masak: please
> I don't think it's the fault of the new backtraces thing, to
> be honest.
> more like a result of parsing or something.
> Well, the other thing is that we don'
On Sun May 30 10:21:26 2010, lue wrote:
> [10:13:37] rakudo: package Foo;
> [10:13:41] rakudo 749fe9: ( no output )
> [10:13:50] lue: care to submit that one?
> [10:13:59] * lue submits rakudobug
>
> This should instead return a parsefail, according to S10. At this time,
> even STD believes i
On Wed Jun 02 07:57:33 2010, masak wrote:
> rakudo: exit
> rakudo 18d996: OUTPUT« in main program body at line 1»
> * masak submits rakudobug
>
> As far as I understand, &exit, while probably implemented internally
> using some exception mechanism or other, shouldn't print a backtrace.
> Back
On Sat May 09 04:31:06 2009, moritz wrote:
> This works fine:
>
> $ ./perl6 -e 'enum A ; ("abc" but c).uc.say'
> ABC
>
> This doesn't
>
> $ >./perl6 -e '("abc" but Bool::True).uc.say'
> The but operator can only be used with a role or enum value on the right
> hand side
>
You can now write this
On Fri Feb 06 03:07:30 2009, masak wrote:
> the distro-specific 'ps' hack is a *temporary* workaround
> for a missing $*PROG special var.
> mberends: oh. :)
> mberends: did you also create a big fat RT TODO ticket for $*PROG?
> for the umpteenth time, sorry, no.
> * masak does so
I assume this
On Wed Jul 08 19:55:59 2009, s1n wrote:
> (21:42:03) s1n: rakudo: warn
> (21:42:06) p6eval: rakudo 70bfd5: OUTPUT«Warning! Something's wrong.»
> (21:42:10) s1n: hah
> (21:42:25) TimToady: it shouldn't have a newline
> (21:42:39) TimToady: Perl 5 would tell you the line number
>
> This probably s
This is an automatically generated mail to inform you that tests are now
available in at least one of these files:
t/spec/S12-methods/parallel-dispatch.t, t/spec/packages/ContainsUnicode.pm
commit 9b5d136c93293e3dd9e66bc7395f1960ee26b229
Author: moritz
Date: Sun Jun 6 09:27:54 2010 +
13 matches
Mail list logo
