On Thu Aug 25 03:17:17 2011, bbkr wrote:
> [12:14] nom: say so "abc" ~~ /a ~ (c) (b)/; say $0 # this is
> weird. in rakudo it captured incorectly ( #77616 ) in nom it does not
> capture at all.
> [12:14] nom b0da69: OUTPUT«Bool::TrueAny()»
Current nom behavior:
> say so "abc" ~~ /a ~ (c) (b)/
On Mon Oct 10 16:25:45 2011, coke wrote:
> On Thu Sep 02 20:55:52 2010, masak wrote:
> > rakudo: my @a = 1, 2, 3; @a X*= 5; say @a.perl; @a = @a X* 5;
> > say @a.perl;
> > rakudo 33e94e: OUTPUT«[1, 2, 3][5, 10, 15]»
> > Should X*= have worked? If not, how to best scale a vector
> > without rep
On Mon Oct 10 00:20:14 2011, masak wrote:
> On Fri Oct 07 12:02:32 2011, coke wrote:
> > On Tue Aug 03 04:53:23 2010, masak wrote:
> > > rakudo: $_ .= ()
> > > rakudo 0a8ef0: OUTPUT«./src/pmc/object.pmc:185: failed
> > > assertion 'name'Backtrace - [...]
> > > * masak submits rakudobug
> > > ra
# New Ticket Created by "Carl Mäsak"
# Please include the string: [perl #115400]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# https://rt.perl.org:443/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=115400 >
r: sub foo(X of X) { }
rakudo e765c9: OUTPUT«===SORRY!===Method 'parameterize'
# New Ticket Created by "Carl Mäsak"
# Please include the string: [perl #115398]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# https://rt.perl.org:443/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=115398 >
r: X[X]
rakudo e765c9: OUTPUT«===SORRY!===Method 'parameterize' not
found for
# New Ticket Created by "Carl Mäsak"
# Please include the string: [perl #115396]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# https://rt.perl.org:443/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=115396 >
r: say "@a[]"
rakudo e765c9: OUTPUT«Null PMC access in
find_method('postcircumf
On Sat Oct 20 18:17:19 2012, coke wrote:
> On Tue Jun 15 02:16:28 2010, masak wrote:
> > How does case insensitive matching work in perl 6?
> > e.g. "ß" ~~ m:i/SS/
> > sorear: that's the syntax, so I assume you're asking about
the
> > semantics.
> > oh wait, that example is tricky :)
> > I wo
coke (>):
> Is this sufficient to close the ticket?
I would say so; the Null PMC access is gone. Resolving ticket.
