Re: [off-list] Re: LANGUAGES.STATUS also for languages not in the tree?

2003-10-13 Thread Piers Cawley
Dan Sugalski [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Wed, 8 Oct 2003, Luke Palmer wrote: Luke Palmer writes: Hi Jos, Jos Visser writes: Mightn't it be (is this English by the way? :-) a good idea to use LANGUAGES.STATUS also for maintaining track of parrot-generating compilers that are not

[off-list] Re: LANGUAGES.STATUS also for languages not in the tree?

2003-10-08 Thread Luke Palmer
Hi Jos, Jos Visser writes: Mightn't it be (is this English by the way? :-) a good idea to use LANGUAGES.STATUS also for maintaining track of parrot-generating compilers that are not in the main tree? Yeah, that's English. Mightn't is an archaic word which is sometimes fun to use. Saying it

Re: [off-list] Re: LANGUAGES.STATUS also for languages not in the tree?

2003-10-08 Thread Luke Palmer
Luke Palmer writes: Hi Jos, Jos Visser writes: Mightn't it be (is this English by the way? :-) a good idea to use LANGUAGES.STATUS also for maintaining track of parrot-generating compilers that are not in the main tree? Yeah, that's English. Mightn't is an archaic word which is

Re: [off-list] Re: LANGUAGES.STATUS also for languages not in the tree?

2003-10-08 Thread Dan Sugalski
On Wed, 8 Oct 2003, Luke Palmer wrote: Luke Palmer writes: Hi Jos, Jos Visser writes: Mightn't it be (is this English by the way? :-) a good idea to use LANGUAGES.STATUS also for maintaining track of parrot-generating compilers that are not in the main tree? Yeah, that's

Re: [off-list] Re: LANGUAGES.STATUS also for languages not in the tree?

2003-10-08 Thread Andrew Wilson
On Wed, Oct 08, 2003 at 10:17:32AM -0400, Dan Sugalski wrote: On Wed, 8 Oct 2003, Luke Palmer wrote: There it goes again! That was *supposed* to be off-list! Well, now the entirety of the internals list can learn about English grammar. Hoo-ray. You mean American Grammar. I'm pretty