Re: [perl #36812] Compiling Pugs against Parrot

2005-08-12 Thread Adrian Lambeck
> Strange. You could replace the .IGLOBALS_CONFIG_HASH with it's value (6) > (and drop the .include line) and try to track down what's wrong with: > > $ bin/parrot parrot-config.imc prefix I did that - and the same with line 56 concerning iterator.pasm because that also did not work. Afterwards i

Re: [perl #36812] Compiling Pugs against Parrot

2005-08-08 Thread Leopold Toetsch
Adrian Lambeck wrote: r8841 (regarding root.in) was bogus - I dropped too much. Fixed in r8853. agree - the svn version is working now - I updated my patch for root.in but it still does not work :-(. Do I need to patch something else too ? Right now I have patches for config/gen/makefiles/r

Re: [perl #36812] Compiling Pugs against Parrot

2005-08-08 Thread Adrian Lambeck
> r8841 (regarding root.in) was bogus - I dropped too much. Fixed in > r8853. agree - the svn version is working now - I updated my patch for root.in but it still does not work :-(. Do I need to patch something else too ? Right now I have patches for config/gen/makefiles/root.in and parrot-conf

Re: [perl #36812] Compiling Pugs against Parrot

2005-08-07 Thread Leopold Toetsch
On Aug 6, 2005, at 15:21, Adrian Lambeck wrote: 2. I made patches agains r8818 for the files that changed to apply to parrot-0.2.3 but these did not work out the way I though - maybe I am missing something. I patched parrot-config and config/gen/makefiles/root.in r8841 (regarding root.in)

Re: [perl #36812] Compiling Pugs against Parrot

2005-08-06 Thread Adrian Lambeck
> Fixed (r8839 / r8840). > > $ perl Configure.pl --prefix=/home/lt/src/p-0.2.3 > $ make && make install > $ cd ~/src/p-0.2.3 > $ bin/parrot parrot-config.imc prefix > /home/lt/src/p-0.2.3 > > leo Hi Leo, maybe you are right but I can`t test it because: 1. jrieks got a conflict in the current svn

Re: [perl #36812] Compiling Pugs against Parrot

2005-08-06 Thread Leopold Toetsch
Adrian Lambeck wrote: So the question is: is that file installed properly to your --prefix directory structure? Maybe you are querying the wrong parrot too (the config paths and settings gets compiled into the executable of parrot)? It is installed properly and I am not querying but the pugs c

Re: [perl #36812] Compiling Pugs against Parrot

2005-08-05 Thread Adrian Lambeck
> So the question is: is that file installed properly to your --prefix > directory structure? > Maybe you are querying the wrong parrot too (the config paths and > settings gets compiled into the executable of parrot)? It is installed properly and I am not querying but the pugs config is doing it

Re: [perl #36812] Compiling Pugs against Parrot

2005-08-04 Thread Leopold Toetsch
On Aug 4, 2005, at 16:17, Lambeck (via RT) wrote: # New Ticket Created by Lambeck # Please include the string: [perl #36812] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # https://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=36812 > For the last 2 hours I tried to compile

[perl #36812] Compiling Pugs against Parrot

2005-08-04 Thread via RT
# New Ticket Created by Lambeck # Please include the string: [perl #36812] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # https://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=36812 > For the last 2 hours I tried to compile Pugs-2.6.9 against Parrot-0.2.2. It does not work be