Thanks, Andy. Applied to trunk in r21060.
On Mon, 3 Sep 2007, James Keenan via RT wrote:
> Andy (plus everyone else),
>
> Could you please copy these new versions of
> t/configure/107-inter_progs.0?.t to t/configure/ in your sandbox for
> trunk and try them out?
They appear to pass without complaint.
--
Andy Dougherty
Andy (plus everyone else),
Could you please copy these new versions of
t/configure/107-inter_progs.0?.t to t/configure/ in your sandbox for
trunk and try them out?
Thank you very much.
kid51
107-inter_progs.02.t
Description: Binary data
107-inter_progs.01.t
Description: Binary data
On Sep 3, 2007, at 9:30 AM, Andy Dougherty via RT wrote:
On Mon, 3 Sep 2007, Andy Dougherty wrote:
Fixing up the @INC paths, I get only four issues: Failures (due to
callbacks) in 107-inter_progs.0[12],
... which is proving to be the most baffling testing problem I've
ever faced (but wil
On Mon, 3 Sep 2007, Andy Dougherty wrote:
> On Fri, 31 Aug 2007, James Keenan via RT wrote:
>
> > On Tue Aug 28 10:00:38 2007, doughera wrote:
> > > On Solaris, I'm getting the following failure in both 107-
> > > inter_progs.01.t
> > > and .02 .t. I suspect it has to do with the use of callback
On Sep 3, 2007, at 7:48 AM, Andy Dougherty via RT wrote:
On Fri, 31 Aug 2007, James Keenan via RT wrote:
Andy: If you get a chance, could you do a checkout of the
reconfigure
branch (https://svn.perl.org/parrot/branches/reconfigure) and
run: perl
Configure.pl --test --configure_trace ?
On 03/09/07, Andy Dougherty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> One other question: Why does the test suite probe over and over again
> for svn, svk, and git? Why can't Configure just look once?
Historical reasons mostly. This same thought has also struck me
recently and I think it would be a good idea
On Fri, 31 Aug 2007, James Keenan via RT wrote:
> On Tue Aug 28 10:00:38 2007, doughera wrote:
> > On Solaris, I'm getting the following failure in both 107-
> > inter_progs.01.t
> > and .02 .t. I suspect it has to do with the use of callbacks in the
> > Solaris hints file.
>
> Andy: If you g
On Tue Aug 28 10:00:38 2007, doughera wrote:
> On Solaris, I'm getting the following failure in both 107-
> inter_progs.01.t
> and .02 .t. I suspect it has to do with the use of callbacks in the
> Solaris hints file.
Andy: If you get a chance, could you do a checkout of the reconfigure
branch
On Wed Aug 29 06:42:28 2007, doughera wrote:
> On Tue, 28 Aug 2007, James Keenan via RT wrote:
>
> > On Tue Aug 28 10:00:38 2007, doughera wrote:
> > > On Solaris, I'm getting the following failure in both 107-
> > > inter_progs.01.t
> > > and .02 .t. I suspect it has to do with the use of callba
Andy Dougherty wrote:
This problem is not really Solaris-specific at all. It's simply that
the emulation is missing a bunch of methods. From perldoc -f tie:
A class implementing a file handle should have the following methods:
TIEHANDLE classname, LIST
READ this, scalar, l
On Tue, 28 Aug 2007, James Keenan via RT wrote:
> On Tue Aug 28 10:00:38 2007, doughera wrote:
> > On Solaris, I'm getting the following failure in both 107-
> > inter_progs.01.t
> > and .02 .t. I suspect it has to do with the use of callbacks in the
> > Solaris hints file. I don't know offhand
On Tue Aug 28 10:00:38 2007, doughera wrote:
> On Solaris, I'm getting the following failure in both 107-
> inter_progs.01.t
> and .02 .t. I suspect it has to do with the use of callbacks in the
> Solaris hints file. I don't know offhand what's trying to OPEN what,
> but
> the TIEHANDLE emulation
# New Ticket Created by Andy Dougherty
# Please include the string: [perl #45025]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=45025 >
On Solaris, I'm getting the following failure in both 107-inter_progs.01.t
and .02 .t
14 matches
Mail list logo
