Thanks for the feedback. I added a fudged test to S05-metachars/tilde.t with
the following commit: https://github.com/perl6/roast/commit/f15d9aed26
Current behaviour:
> say so "abc" ~~ /a ~ (c) (b)/; say $0, $1
True
｢b｣
｢c｣
As I understand S05 the ~ operator basically rewrites the above regex to /a (b)
(c)/ and only then matching and capturing happens.
So the question seems to be, whether numbering of subpatterns should be done
before the
On Thu Aug 25 03:17:17 2011, bbkr wrote:
> [12:14] nom: say so "abc" ~~ /a ~ (c) (b)/; say $0 # this is
> weird. in rakudo it captured incorectly ( #77616 ) in nom it does not
> capture at all.
> [12:14] nom b0da69: OUTPUT«Bool::TrueAny()»
Current nom behavior:
> say so "abc" ~~ /a ~ (c) (b)/
# New Ticket Created by Paweł Pabian
# Please include the string: [perl #77616]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=77616 >
[17:29] rakudo: say so "abc" ~~ /a ~ (c) (b)/; say $0
[17:29] rakudo dc9900: OUTPUT«1
