Re: CPANDB - was: Module::Dependency 1.84

In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Adam Kennedy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Nobody would care about dependencies if they never failed (except for > the issue of installation time). I have a couple of clients that are very skittish about outside dependencies in general. They have to get thrid-part

Re: CPANDB - was: Module::Dependency 1.84

In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Tels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> I am not sure what "stupid" consists, but my system wouldn't have problems > handling 512 MB of memory. I'd prefer that you not decide that my system needs 512Mb to use this, even if you can handle that on your side.

Re: CPANDB - was: Module::Dependency 1.84

In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Tels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > My real-grand-plan was always to have a CPANDB module that does exactly the > following: I think the latest version of my cpan(1) script does everything you show, although it doesn't use a local database. It would be nice to have

Re: CPANDB - was: Module::Dependency 1.84

A. Pagaltzis wrote: * Tels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-07-14 02:40]: announced to early - now everybody tells me how I have to implement it and why my way wont work You were saying Adam’s way is inferior to your way. I disagreed. That’s about the size of it. I agree my way is inferior, especia

Re: CPANDB - was: Module::Dependency 1.84

Plus, I planned to use YAML because it creates a _much_ less heavy overhead and dependency chain. Using SQLite or similiar is what really creates the problems with CPANTS - you cant just access the raw database without the front-end. Erm, I'm not sure I get you here. The main problem with all th

Re: CPANDB - was: Module::Dependency 1.84

* Tels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-07-14 02:40]: > announced to early - now everybody tells me how I have to > implement it and why my way wont work You were saying Adam’s way is inferior to your way. I disagreed. That’s about the size of it. Regards, -- Aristotle Pagaltzis //

Re: CPANDB - was: Module::Dependency 1.84

On 7/14/06, Tels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: afte seeing the recent discussion about CPANDB and CPAN::Index, I don't think I want to work on that project anymore for two reasons: Hey Tels, Please ignore the other people in the thread. Instead spend a little bit of time to do something simple t

Re: CPANDB - was: Module::Dependency 1.84

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Heya Tim, afte seeing the recent discussion about CPANDB and CPAN::Index, I don't think I want to work on that project anymore for two reasons: * announced to early - now everybody tells me how I have to implement it and why my way wont work * ano

Re: CPANDB - was: Module::Dependency 1.84

* Tels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-07-13 21:50]: > On Thursday 13 July 2006 19:40, A. Pagaltzis wrote: > > * Tels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-07-12 19:00]: > > > Using SQLite or similiar is what really creates the > > > problems with CPANTS - you cant just access the raw > > > database without the fron

Re: CPANDB - was: Module::Dependency 1.84

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Moin, On Thursday 13 July 2006 19:40, A. Pagaltzis wrote: > * Tels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-07-12 19:00]: > > Using SQLite or similiar is what really creates the problems > > with CPANTS - you cant just access the raw database without the > > front-e

Re: CPANDB - was: Module::Dependency 1.84

* Michael Peters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-07-13 19:50]: > And if you use DBD::SQLite you don't even need that. I has > everything you'd need. Actually that’s more of a hassle. If you install DBI::Shell you get close, but having to specify a DSN is still a hassle. With the SQLite binary you just s

Re: CPANDB - was: Module::Dependency 1.84

A. Pagaltzis wrote: > * Tels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-07-12 19:00]: >> Using SQLite or similiar is what really creates the problems >> with CPANTS - you cant just access the raw database without the >> front-end. > > All you need is one binary from www.sqlite.org – I don’t follow > why this is

Re: CPANDB - was: Module::Dependency 1.84

* Tels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-07-12 19:00]: > Using SQLite or similiar is what really creates the problems > with CPANTS - you cant just access the raw database without the > front-end. All you need is one binary from www.sqlite.org – I don’t follow why this is a problem. And I certainly prefe

Re: CPANDB - was: Module::Dependency 1.84

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Moin, On Thursday 13 July 2006 08:26, Adam Kennedy wrote: > Tels wrote: > > The DB backend shouldn't matter at all, it should be transparent and be > > switchable without any noticable change at the front. > > Yep, right with you. Hence DBIx::Class.

Re: CPANDB - was: Module::Dependency 1.84

Tels wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Moin, On Wednesday 12 July 2006 03:13, David Golden wrote: Tels wrote: My idea was to build _only_ the database, and do it right, simple and easy to use and then get everyone else to just use the DB instead of fiddling with their own.

Re: CPANDB - was: Module::Dependency 1.84

On Wed, Jul 12, 2006 at 03:03:14AM +0200, Tels wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Moin Tim, > > On Tuesday 11 July 2006 18:34, Tim Bunce wrote: > > I needed some code to trawl through a directory tree parsing perl > > modules and scripts to determine their dependencies.

Re: CPANDB - was: Module::Dependency 1.84

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Moin, On Wednesday 12 July 2006 03:13, David Golden wrote: > Tels wrote: > > My idea was to build _only_ the database, and do it right, simple and > > easy to use and then get everyone else to just use the DB instead of > > fiddling with their own. (s

Re: CPANDB - was: Module::Dependency 1.84

Tels wrote: My idea was to build _only_ the database, and do it right, simple and easy to use and then get everyone else to just use the DB instead of fiddling with their own. (simple by having the database being superior to every other hack thats in existance now :-) I even got so far as to

CPANDB - was: Module::Dependency 1.84

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Moin Tim, On Tuesday 11 July 2006 18:34, Tim Bunce wrote: > I needed some code to trawl through a directory tree parsing perl > modules and scripts to determine their dependencies. > > The closest existing CPAN code was Module::Dependency but it fell